Institut für Anorganische Chemie und Strukturchemie , Heinrich-Heine-Universität , Universitätsstraße 1 , D-40225 Düsseldorf , Germany.
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2018 Oct 3;10(39):33589-33600. doi: 10.1021/acsami.8b12938. Epub 2018 Sep 19.
Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) and inorganic fillers are frequently incorporated into mixed-matrix membranes (MMMs) to overcome the traditional trade-off in permeability ( P) and selectivity for pure organic polymer membranes. Therefore, it is of great interest to examine the influence of porous and nonporous fillers in MMMs with respect to the possible role of the polymer-filler interface, that is, the void volume. In this work, we compare the same MOF filler in a porous and nonporous state, so that artifacts from a different polymer-filler interface are excluded. MMMs with the porous MOF aluminum fumarate (Al-fum) and with a nonporous dimethyl sulfoxide solvent-filled aluminum fumarate (Al-fum(DMSO)), both with Matrimid as polymer, were prepared. Filler contents ranged from 4 to 24 wt %. Gas separation performances of both MMMs were studied by mixed gas measurements using a binary mixture of CO/CH with gas permeation following the theoretical prediction by the Maxwell model for both porous and nonporous dispersed phase (filler). MMMs with the porous Al-fum filler showed increased CO and CH permeability with a moderate rise in selectivity upon increasing filler fraction. The MMMs with the nonporous Al-fum(DMSO) filler displayed a reduction in permeability while maintaining the selectivity of the neat polymer. A linear dependence of log P versus the reciprocal specific free fractional volume (sFFV) rules out a significant contribution from a void volume. The sFFV includes the free volume of the polymer and the MOF, but not the polymer-filler interface volume (so-called void volume). The sFFV for the MMM was calculated between 0.23 cm/g for a 24 wt % Al-fum/Matrimid MMM and 0.12 cm/g for a 24 wt % Al-fum(DMSO)/Matrimid MMM. The negligible effect of an interface volume is supported by a good matching of theoretical and experimental density of the Al-fum and Al-fum/(DMSO) MMMs which gave a specific void volume below 0.02 cm/g, often even below 0.01 cm/g.
金属-有机骨架(MOF)和无机填料经常被纳入混合基质膜(MMM)中,以克服纯有机聚合物膜在渗透性(P)和选择性方面的传统权衡。因此,研究多孔和非孔填料在 MMM 中的影响对于聚合物-填料界面的可能作用(即空隙体积)非常重要。在这项工作中,我们比较了相同的 MOF 填料在多孔和非多孔状态下的情况,从而排除了不同聚合物-填料界面的假象。使用 Matrimid 作为聚合物,制备了具有多孔富马酸铝(Al-fum)和非多孔二甲基亚砜溶剂填充富马酸铝(Al-fum(DMSO))的 MMM。填料含量范围为 4 至 24 重量%。通过使用 CO/CH 二元混合物进行混合气测量,研究了两种 MMM 的气体分离性能,气体渗透遵循多孔和非多孔分散相(填料)的 Maxwell 模型的理论预测。具有多孔 Al-fum 填料的 MMM 显示出 CO 和 CH 渗透性增加,选择性适度提高,随着填料分数的增加。具有非多孔 Al-fum(DMSO)填料的 MMM 显示出渗透性降低,同时保持了纯聚合物的选择性。log P 与倒数比自由分数体积(sFFV)的线性关系排除了空隙体积的显著贡献。sFFV 包括聚合物和 MOF 的自由体积,但不包括聚合物-填料界面体积(所谓的空隙体积)。对于 24 重量%Al-fum/Matrimid MMM,sFFV 为 0.23 cm/g,对于 24 重量%Al-fum(DMSO)/Matrimid MMM,sFFV 为 0.12 cm/g。Al-fum 和 Al-fum/(DMSO)MMM 的理论和实验密度很好地匹配,支持界面体积的影响可以忽略不计,这给出了低于 0.02 cm/g,通常甚至低于 0.01 cm/g 的特定空隙体积。