Département de biologie, Université de Moncton, Moncton, New Brunswick E1A 3E9, Canada; Institute of Legal Medicine, University Hospital Frankfurt am Main, Goethe-University, Kennedyallee 104, D-60596 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Institute of Legal Medicine, University Hospital Frankfurt am Main, Goethe-University, Kennedyallee 104, D-60596 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Forensic Sci Int. 2018 Oct;291:124-132. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.08.014. Epub 2018 Aug 23.
Most forensic studies have examined decomposition and insect colonization for estimating the minimum postmortem interval (PMI) using carcasses that are readily accessible to insects but in homicides, cadavers are often concealed to a certain extent. Here, we tested the hypothesis that the type of concealment of a decomposing resource and the permeability of the material used affect to different extents the animals attracted to the resource. To this end, beetle assemblages were documented for 100days on 15 domestic pig carcasses, placed individually in soft shell suitcases, trashcans with a hinged lid, and sealable drums in an untended open field in New Brunswick, Canada. Five pigs were allocated to each treatment. During the study, almost 33,000 beetle occurrences from 50 recognizable taxonomic units were documented around containers that concealed carcasses. Results indicated that trashcans, drums, and suitcases had different effects on the patterns of beetle arrival and departure from the vicinity of concealed carcasses, on beetle assembly, on their breeding strategies, as well as on the interspecific relationships between beetles of forensic importance. Of the 50 recognizable taxonomic units, only six species exhibited a somewhat predictable occurrence and yielded information about the time of placement or the type of container. Results also suggested that some of the abundant Silphidae species opted to breed or feed in suboptimal conditions or at a later period to avoid competing with the dominant silphid Necrodes surinamensis (Fabr.). This suggests the occurrence of preferential colonization and/or asymmetrical competition between beetle species, which would affect the potential of these species for PMI estimations on concealed carcasses.
大多数法医研究都通过检查尸体的分解和昆虫定年来估算死后时间(PMI),这些尸体通常是昆虫容易接触到的。然而,在凶杀案中,尸体往往会被隐藏起来。在这里,我们测试了这样一个假设,即分解资源的隐藏类型和所使用材料的渗透性会在不同程度上影响吸引到资源的动物。为此,我们在加拿大新不伦瑞克省一个未加管理的开阔地中,将 15 具单独放置在软壳手提箱、带铰链盖的垃圾桶和密封桶中的家养猪尸体进行了为期 100 天的甲虫组合研究。每个处理组分配了 5 头猪。在研究过程中,我们在 15 个容器周围记录了近 33000 次来自 50 个可识别分类单元的甲虫出现情况,这些容器隐藏了尸体。结果表明,垃圾桶、桶和手提箱对隐藏尸体附近甲虫的到达和离开模式、甲虫的组装、它们的繁殖策略以及对具有法医学重要性的甲虫的种间关系都有不同的影响。在 50 个可识别的分类单元中,只有 6 个物种的出现具有一定的可预测性,能够提供关于放置时间或容器类型的信息。结果还表明,一些丰富的 Silphidae 物种选择在较差的条件下或在后期繁殖或进食,以避免与占主导地位的 Necrodes surinamensis(Fabr.)Silphid 竞争。这表明甲虫物种之间存在优先定殖和/或不对称竞争,这将影响这些物种在隐藏尸体上进行 PMI 估算的潜力。