Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation and Neuroplasticity Laboratory, Department of Physiotherapy, School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Science, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Department of Rehabilitation, Nutrition and Sport, School of Allied Health, Discipline of Physiotherapy, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.
Brain Res. 2018 Dec 1;1700:190-198. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2018.09.002. Epub 2018 Sep 5.
High degrees of variability reported in Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) assessment of corticospinal excitability (CSE) highlight the need to investigate its reliability as an assessment tool. This study investigated the effect of TMS test intensity on the amplitude, variability and test-retest reliability of motor evoked potentials (MEP). Twenty-five MEPs were recorded at 105%, 120%, 135%, 150% and 165% of resting motor threshold across three sessions in twelve participants. Repeated measures analysis of variance (RM-ANOVA), recruitment curve gradients and standardised z-value SDs were utilized to investigate the effect of TMS test intensity on MEP amplitude and variability. Test-retest reliability of MEP amplitude was assessed using RM-ANOVA and intraclass correlations (ICC). RM-ANOVA reported MEP amplitude significantly increased between 105-120% and 120-135% with non-significant increases thereafter. Recruitment curve gradients reduced as TMS test intensity increased. Standardised z-value SDs reported MEP amplitude variability reduced as TMS test intensity increased with the only significant reduction occurring between 120% and 135%. RM-ANOVA reported no significant effect of time on MEP amplitude, indicating agreement between sessions. ICCs indicated significant intra- and inter-session reliability for all TMS test intensities except for 105%. The only significant reduction in variability and final significant increase in MEP amplitude occurred between the same TMS test intensities. Reduced variability and increased reliability at higher TMS test intensities validate the use of higher TMS test intensities to assess changes in CSE in future research. To increase accuracy in capturing true changes in CSE we recommend assessing changes in CSE across a range of TMS test intensities.
经颅磁刺激(TMS)评估皮质脊髓兴奋性(CSE)的报道存在高度变异性,这突出表明需要研究其作为评估工具的可靠性。本研究调查了 TMS 测试强度对运动诱发电位(MEP)幅度、变异性和测试-重测可靠性的影响。在 12 名参与者的三个会话中,在 105%、120%、135%、150%和 165%的休息运动阈值下记录了 25 个 MEP。使用重复测量方差分析(RM-ANOVA)、募集曲线梯度和标准化 z 值 SD 来研究 TMS 测试强度对 MEP 幅度和变异性的影响。使用 RM-ANOVA 和组内相关系数(ICC)评估 MEP 幅度的测试-重测可靠性。RM-ANOVA 报告说,MEP 幅度在 105-120%和 120-135%之间显著增加,此后增加不显著。募集曲线梯度随着 TMS 测试强度的增加而降低。标准化 z 值 SD 报告 MEP 幅度的变异性随着 TMS 测试强度的增加而降低,仅在 120%和 135%之间发生显著降低。RM-ANOVA 报告说 TMS 测试强度对 MEP 幅度没有显著影响,表明各会话之间存在一致性。ICC 表明除了 105%之外,所有 TMS 测试强度的内和间会话可靠性均具有显著意义。变异性的唯一显著降低和 MEP 幅度的最终显著增加发生在相同的 TMS 测试强度之间。更高 TMS 测试强度下的变异性降低和可靠性增加验证了在未来研究中使用更高 TMS 测试强度来评估 CSE 变化的合理性。为了提高捕获 CSE 真实变化的准确性,我们建议在一系列 TMS 测试强度下评估 CSE 的变化。