Department of Pathology, Kunming General Hospital of Chengdu Command, Kunming, PR China; Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, PR China.
Department of Radiation Oncology, First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, PR China.
Clin Chim Acta. 2019 Feb;489:254-260. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2018.08.040. Epub 2018 Sep 6.
RAS oncogene mutations frequently occur in acute myeloid leukaemia (AML), but the prognostic significance of RAS mutations in AML is inconclusive. We searched the databases of PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Cochrane from 1990 to 2018. In this study, 24 eligible studies were included, and the meta-analysis was conducted with the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Version 2 software program. The row hazard ratio (HR) was adjusted and re-evaluated when publication bias existed after detecting all the heterogeneities. A combined analysis showed that RAS mutations were not associated with a poor prognosis in general AML patients (HR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.78-1.19, p = 0.70). To further verify the results, a subgroup analysis was conducted. Interestingly, in the analysis of age bracket, children with RAS mutations had an unfavourable survival (HR: 1.35, 95% CI: 1.05-1.75, p = 0.02) of AML, but the adults did not (HR: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.70-1.09, p = 0.21). Further analysis of the subgroup of children indicated that patients with NRAS mutations had an adverse prognosis (HR: 1.55, 95% CI: 1.13-2.12, p = 0.007), but not those with KRAS mutations (HR: 1.51, 95% CI: 0.34-6.73, p = 0.59). In conclusion, this study revealed that RAS mutations did not influence the over survival for adults with AML. However, NRAS mutations may be a key prognostic marker related with poor survival for children with AML.
RAS 癌基因突变在急性髓系白血病(AML)中经常发生,但 RAS 突变在 AML 中的预后意义尚不确定。我们从 1990 年到 2018 年在 PubMed、Web of Science、EMBASE 和 Cochrane 数据库中进行了检索。在这项研究中,纳入了 24 项符合条件的研究,并使用 Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Version 2 软件程序进行了荟萃分析。当检测到所有异质性后存在发表偏倚时,会调整并重新评估行风险比(HR)。综合分析表明,RAS 突变与一般 AML 患者的不良预后无关(HR:0.96,95%CI:0.78-1.19,p=0.70)。为了进一步验证结果,我们进行了亚组分析。有趣的是,在年龄组分析中,携带 RAS 突变的儿童 AML 患者的生存情况较差(HR:1.35,95%CI:1.05-1.75,p=0.02),而成年人则没有(HR:0.87,95%CI:0.70-1.09,p=0.21)。对儿童亚组的进一步分析表明,NRAS 突变患者的预后不良(HR:1.55,95%CI:1.13-2.12,p=0.007),但 KRAS 突变患者则不然(HR:1.51,95%CI:0.34-6.73,p=0.59)。总之,本研究表明 RAS 突变不会影响 AML 成人的总生存。然而,NRAS 突变可能是与 AML 儿童不良生存相关的关键预后标志物。