Suppr超能文献

布地奈德与美沙拉嗪或安慰剂在淋巴细胞性结肠炎诱导治疗中的疗效和安全性。

Efficacy and Safety of Budesonide, vs Mesalazine or Placebo, as Induction Therapy for Lymphocytic Colitis.

机构信息

Center for Digestive Diseases, Internal Medicine Center Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Institute for Pathology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Germany.

出版信息

Gastroenterology. 2018 Dec;155(6):1795-1804.e3. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.08.042. Epub 2018 Sep 7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Lymphocytic colitis is a common cause of chronic, nonbloody diarrhea. However, the effects of treatment are unclear and randomized placebo-controlled trials were requested in a Cochrane review. We performed a randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter study to evaluate budesonide and mesalazine as induction therapy for lymphocytic colitis.

METHODS

Patients with active lymphocytic colitis were randomly assigned to groups given budesonide 9 mg once daily (Budenofalk granules), mesalazine 3 g once daily (Salofalk granules), or placebo for 8 weeks in a double-blind, double-dummy design. The primary endpoint was clinical remission, defined as ≤21 stools (including ≤6 watery stools), in the 7 days before week 8.

RESULTS

The final analysis included 57 patients (19 per group). Most patients were female (72%) and the mean age was 59 years. The proportion of patients in clinical remission at week 8 was significantly higher in the budesonide group than in the placebo group (intention-to-treat analysis, 79% vs 42%; P = .01). The difference in proportions of patients in clinical remission at week 8 between the mesalazine (63%) and placebo groups was not significant (P = .09). The proportion of patients with histologic remission at week 8 was significantly higher in the budesonide group (68%) vs the mesalazine (26%; P = .02) or placebo (21%; P = .008) groups. The incidence of adverse events was 47.4% in the budesonide group, 68.4% in the mesalazine group, and 42.1% in the placebo group.

CONCLUSIONS

In a randomized multicenter study, we found oral budesonide 9 mg once daily to be effective and safe for induction of clinical and histologic remission in patients with lymphocytic colitis, compared with placebo. Oral mesalazine 3 g once daily was not significantly better than placebo. ClinicalTrials.gov no: NCT01209208.

摘要

背景与目的

淋巴细胞性结肠炎是慢性非血性腹泻的常见病因。然而,治疗效果尚不清楚,Cochrane 综述中要求进行随机安慰剂对照试验。我们进行了一项随机、安慰剂对照、多中心研究,以评估布地奈德和美沙拉嗪作为淋巴细胞性结肠炎的诱导治疗。

方法

活动期淋巴细胞性结肠炎患者随机分为三组,分别接受布地奈德 9mg 每日一次(Budenofalk 颗粒)、美沙拉嗪 3g 每日一次(Salofalk 颗粒)或安慰剂治疗 8 周,采用双盲、双模拟设计。主要终点为第 8 周前 7 天内≤21 次粪便(包括≤6 次水样便)的临床缓解。

结果

最终分析包括 57 例患者(每组 19 例)。大多数患者为女性(72%),平均年龄为 59 岁。第 8 周时,布地奈德组临床缓解率明显高于安慰剂组(意向治疗分析,79% vs 42%;P=.01)。美沙拉嗪(63%)组与安慰剂组间第 8 周时临床缓解率的差异无统计学意义(P=.09)。第 8 周时,布地奈德组组织学缓解率明显高于美沙拉嗪(26%;P=.02)或安慰剂(21%;P=.008)组。布地奈德组不良事件发生率为 47.4%,美沙拉嗪组为 68.4%,安慰剂组为 42.1%。

结论

在一项随机多中心研究中,我们发现每日口服布地奈德 9mg 对淋巴细胞性结肠炎患者的临床和组织学缓解有效且安全,优于安慰剂。每日口服美沙拉嗪 3g 并不优于安慰剂。ClinicalTrials.gov 编号:NCT01209208。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验