Center for Digestive Diseases, Internal Medicine Center Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Institute for Pathology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Germany.
Gastroenterology. 2018 Dec;155(6):1795-1804.e3. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.08.042. Epub 2018 Sep 7.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Lymphocytic colitis is a common cause of chronic, nonbloody diarrhea. However, the effects of treatment are unclear and randomized placebo-controlled trials were requested in a Cochrane review. We performed a randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter study to evaluate budesonide and mesalazine as induction therapy for lymphocytic colitis.
Patients with active lymphocytic colitis were randomly assigned to groups given budesonide 9 mg once daily (Budenofalk granules), mesalazine 3 g once daily (Salofalk granules), or placebo for 8 weeks in a double-blind, double-dummy design. The primary endpoint was clinical remission, defined as ≤21 stools (including ≤6 watery stools), in the 7 days before week 8.
The final analysis included 57 patients (19 per group). Most patients were female (72%) and the mean age was 59 years. The proportion of patients in clinical remission at week 8 was significantly higher in the budesonide group than in the placebo group (intention-to-treat analysis, 79% vs 42%; P = .01). The difference in proportions of patients in clinical remission at week 8 between the mesalazine (63%) and placebo groups was not significant (P = .09). The proportion of patients with histologic remission at week 8 was significantly higher in the budesonide group (68%) vs the mesalazine (26%; P = .02) or placebo (21%; P = .008) groups. The incidence of adverse events was 47.4% in the budesonide group, 68.4% in the mesalazine group, and 42.1% in the placebo group.
In a randomized multicenter study, we found oral budesonide 9 mg once daily to be effective and safe for induction of clinical and histologic remission in patients with lymphocytic colitis, compared with placebo. Oral mesalazine 3 g once daily was not significantly better than placebo. ClinicalTrials.gov no: NCT01209208.
淋巴细胞性结肠炎是慢性非血性腹泻的常见病因。然而,治疗效果尚不清楚,Cochrane 综述中要求进行随机安慰剂对照试验。我们进行了一项随机、安慰剂对照、多中心研究,以评估布地奈德和美沙拉嗪作为淋巴细胞性结肠炎的诱导治疗。
活动期淋巴细胞性结肠炎患者随机分为三组,分别接受布地奈德 9mg 每日一次(Budenofalk 颗粒)、美沙拉嗪 3g 每日一次(Salofalk 颗粒)或安慰剂治疗 8 周,采用双盲、双模拟设计。主要终点为第 8 周前 7 天内≤21 次粪便(包括≤6 次水样便)的临床缓解。
最终分析包括 57 例患者(每组 19 例)。大多数患者为女性(72%),平均年龄为 59 岁。第 8 周时,布地奈德组临床缓解率明显高于安慰剂组(意向治疗分析,79% vs 42%;P=.01)。美沙拉嗪(63%)组与安慰剂组间第 8 周时临床缓解率的差异无统计学意义(P=.09)。第 8 周时,布地奈德组组织学缓解率明显高于美沙拉嗪(26%;P=.02)或安慰剂(21%;P=.008)组。布地奈德组不良事件发生率为 47.4%,美沙拉嗪组为 68.4%,安慰剂组为 42.1%。
在一项随机多中心研究中,我们发现每日口服布地奈德 9mg 对淋巴细胞性结肠炎患者的临床和组织学缓解有效且安全,优于安慰剂。每日口服美沙拉嗪 3g 并不优于安慰剂。ClinicalTrials.gov 编号:NCT01209208。