• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

布地奈德与美沙拉嗪或安慰剂在淋巴细胞性结肠炎诱导治疗中的疗效和安全性。

Efficacy and Safety of Budesonide, vs Mesalazine or Placebo, as Induction Therapy for Lymphocytic Colitis.

机构信息

Center for Digestive Diseases, Internal Medicine Center Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Institute for Pathology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Germany.

出版信息

Gastroenterology. 2018 Dec;155(6):1795-1804.e3. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.08.042. Epub 2018 Sep 7.

DOI:10.1053/j.gastro.2018.08.042
PMID:30195447
Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Lymphocytic colitis is a common cause of chronic, nonbloody diarrhea. However, the effects of treatment are unclear and randomized placebo-controlled trials were requested in a Cochrane review. We performed a randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter study to evaluate budesonide and mesalazine as induction therapy for lymphocytic colitis.

METHODS

Patients with active lymphocytic colitis were randomly assigned to groups given budesonide 9 mg once daily (Budenofalk granules), mesalazine 3 g once daily (Salofalk granules), or placebo for 8 weeks in a double-blind, double-dummy design. The primary endpoint was clinical remission, defined as ≤21 stools (including ≤6 watery stools), in the 7 days before week 8.

RESULTS

The final analysis included 57 patients (19 per group). Most patients were female (72%) and the mean age was 59 years. The proportion of patients in clinical remission at week 8 was significantly higher in the budesonide group than in the placebo group (intention-to-treat analysis, 79% vs 42%; P = .01). The difference in proportions of patients in clinical remission at week 8 between the mesalazine (63%) and placebo groups was not significant (P = .09). The proportion of patients with histologic remission at week 8 was significantly higher in the budesonide group (68%) vs the mesalazine (26%; P = .02) or placebo (21%; P = .008) groups. The incidence of adverse events was 47.4% in the budesonide group, 68.4% in the mesalazine group, and 42.1% in the placebo group.

CONCLUSIONS

In a randomized multicenter study, we found oral budesonide 9 mg once daily to be effective and safe for induction of clinical and histologic remission in patients with lymphocytic colitis, compared with placebo. Oral mesalazine 3 g once daily was not significantly better than placebo. ClinicalTrials.gov no: NCT01209208.

摘要

背景与目的

淋巴细胞性结肠炎是慢性非血性腹泻的常见病因。然而,治疗效果尚不清楚,Cochrane 综述中要求进行随机安慰剂对照试验。我们进行了一项随机、安慰剂对照、多中心研究,以评估布地奈德和美沙拉嗪作为淋巴细胞性结肠炎的诱导治疗。

方法

活动期淋巴细胞性结肠炎患者随机分为三组,分别接受布地奈德 9mg 每日一次(Budenofalk 颗粒)、美沙拉嗪 3g 每日一次(Salofalk 颗粒)或安慰剂治疗 8 周,采用双盲、双模拟设计。主要终点为第 8 周前 7 天内≤21 次粪便(包括≤6 次水样便)的临床缓解。

结果

最终分析包括 57 例患者(每组 19 例)。大多数患者为女性(72%),平均年龄为 59 岁。第 8 周时,布地奈德组临床缓解率明显高于安慰剂组(意向治疗分析,79% vs 42%;P=.01)。美沙拉嗪(63%)组与安慰剂组间第 8 周时临床缓解率的差异无统计学意义(P=.09)。第 8 周时,布地奈德组组织学缓解率明显高于美沙拉嗪(26%;P=.02)或安慰剂(21%;P=.008)组。布地奈德组不良事件发生率为 47.4%,美沙拉嗪组为 68.4%,安慰剂组为 42.1%。

结论

在一项随机多中心研究中,我们发现每日口服布地奈德 9mg 对淋巴细胞性结肠炎患者的临床和组织学缓解有效且安全,优于安慰剂。每日口服美沙拉嗪 3g 并不优于安慰剂。ClinicalTrials.gov 编号:NCT01209208。

相似文献

1
Efficacy and Safety of Budesonide, vs Mesalazine or Placebo, as Induction Therapy for Lymphocytic Colitis.布地奈德与美沙拉嗪或安慰剂在淋巴细胞性结肠炎诱导治疗中的疗效和安全性。
Gastroenterology. 2018 Dec;155(6):1795-1804.e3. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.08.042. Epub 2018 Sep 7.
2
Budesonide is more effective than mesalamine or placebo in short-term treatment of collagenous colitis.布地奈德在胶原性结肠炎的短期治疗中比美沙拉嗪或安慰剂更有效。
Gastroenterology. 2014 May;146(5):1222-30.e1-2. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2014.01.019. Epub 2014 Jan 15.
3
Interventions for treating lymphocytic colitis.治疗淋巴细胞性结肠炎的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 13;7(7):CD006096. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006096.pub4.
4
3g mesalazine granules are superior to 9mg budesonide for achieving remission in active ulcerative colitis: a double-blind, double-dummy, randomised trial.3g 美沙拉嗪颗粒在诱导活动期溃疡性结肠炎缓解方面优于 9mg 布地奈德:一项双盲、双模拟、随机试验。
J Crohns Colitis. 2011 Apr;5(2):129-38. doi: 10.1016/j.crohns.2010.11.006. Epub 2010 Dec 14.
5
Interventions for treating lymphocytic colitis.治疗淋巴细胞性结肠炎的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Apr 16(2):CD006096. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006096.pub3.
6
Efficacy and safety of prolonged release budesonide granules in mesalazine-refractory ulcerative colitis: A multi-centre Phase IIa study (TOPICAL-1).在美沙拉嗪抵抗性溃疡性结肠炎中延长释放布地奈德颗粒的疗效和安全性:一项多中心 IIa 期研究(TOPICAL-1)。
United European Gastroenterol J. 2020 Dec;8(10):1186-1195. doi: 10.1177/2050640620962632. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
7
Budesonide is effective in treating lymphocytic colitis: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study.布地奈德治疗淋巴细胞性结肠炎有效:一项随机双盲安慰剂对照研究。
Gastroenterology. 2009 Jun;136(7):2092-100. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.02.078. Epub 2009 Mar 17.
8
Budesonide as induction therapy for incomplete microscopic colitis: A randomised, placebo-controlled multicentre trial.布地奈德治疗不完全型显微镜结肠炎的诱导缓解:一项随机、安慰剂对照、多中心试验。
United European Gastroenterol J. 2021 Sep;9(7):837-847. doi: 10.1002/ueg2.12131. Epub 2021 Aug 20.
9
Once-daily budesonide MMX® extended-release tablets induce remission in patients with mild to moderate ulcerative colitis: results from the CORE I study.每日一次布地奈德 MMX®缓释肠溶片治疗轻中度溃疡性结肠炎的缓解效果:CORE I 研究结果。
Gastroenterology. 2012 Nov;143(5):1218-1226.e2. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.08.003. Epub 2012 Aug 11.
10
Oral 5-aminosalicylic acid for induction of remission in ulcerative colitis.口服5-氨基水杨酸诱导溃疡性结肠炎缓解
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Oct 17;10:CD000543. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000543.pub3.

引用本文的文献

1
Microscopic Colitis: An Underestimated Disease of Growing Importance.显微镜下结肠炎:一种日益重要但被低估的疾病。
J Clin Med. 2024 Sep 24;13(19):5683. doi: 10.3390/jcm13195683.
2
Update on the Epidemiology and Management of Microscopic Colitis.显微镜下结肠炎的流行病学与管理最新进展
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2025 Feb;23(3):490-500. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2024.08.026. Epub 2024 Sep 11.
3
Coeliac Disease and Microscopic Colitis: The Largest Study Assessing Prognosis and Risk of Hospital Admission.乳糜泻和显微镜下结肠炎:评估预后和住院风险的最大研究。
Nutrients. 2024 Jun 29;16(13):2081. doi: 10.3390/nu16132081.
4
Diagnosis and Pharmacological Management of Microscopic Colitis in Geriatric Care.老年医学中小肠结肠炎的诊断和药物治疗管理。
Drugs Aging. 2024 Feb;41(2):113-123. doi: 10.1007/s40266-023-01094-6. Epub 2024 Jan 17.
5
Clinicopathologic Characterization of Lymphocytic Colitis in the Pediatric Population.儿科淋巴细胞性结肠炎的临床病理特征。
Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2024 Mar-Apr;27(2):156-168. doi: 10.1177/10935266231215117. Epub 2023 Dec 31.
6
The natural history of histological changes in microscopic colitis.微观性结肠炎组织学改变的自然病程。
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2023 Apr 27;16:17562848231168237. doi: 10.1177/17562848231168237. eCollection 2023.
7
Efficacy and safety of medical therapies in microscopic colitis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.微观性结肠炎医学疗法的疗效与安全性:一项系统评价与网状Meta分析
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2023 Feb 24;16:17562848231154319. doi: 10.1177/17562848231154319. eCollection 2023.
8
Microscopic colitis: an update.显微镜下结肠炎:最新进展
Med Pharm Rep. 2022 Oct;95(4):370-376. doi: 10.15386/mpr-2389. Epub 2022 Oct 27.
9
Update on Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Enterocolitis.免疫检查点抑制剂相关性肠炎的研究进展
Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2022 Dec;24(12):171-181. doi: 10.1007/s11894-022-00852-7. Epub 2022 Oct 20.
10
Microscopic colitis: Etiopathology, diagnosis, and rational management.显微镜下结肠炎:病因学、诊断和合理治疗。
Elife. 2022 Aug 1;11:e79397. doi: 10.7554/eLife.79397.