Department of Pediatrics, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago.
Department of Pediatrics, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago; Children's Hospitals Neonatal Consortium, Kansas City, MO.
J Pediatr. 2018 Nov;202:38-43.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.07.010. Epub 2018 Sep 5.
To evaluate the association between nutrition delivery practices and energy and protein intake during the transition from parenteral to enteral nutrition in infants of very low birth weight (VLBW).
This was a retrospective analysis of 115 infants who were VLBW from a regional neonatal intensive care unit. Changes in energy and protein intake were estimated during transition phase 1 (0% enteral); phase 2 (>0, ≤33.3% enteral); phase 3 (>33.3, ≤66.7% enteral); phase 4 (>66.7, <100% enteral); and phase 5 (100% enteral). Associations between energy and protein intake were determined for each phase for parenteral nutrition, intravenous lipids, central line, feeding fortification, fluid restriction, and excess non-nutritive fluid intake.
In phases 2 and 3, infants receiving feeding fortification received less protein than infants who were unfortified (-1.1 and -0.3 g/kg/d, respectively; P < .001). However, this negative association was not observed after adjusting for relevant nutrition delivery practices. Despite greater enteral protein intake during phases 2 and 3 (0.3 and 0.8 g/kg/d, respectively; P < .001), infants with early fortification received less parenteral protein than infants who were unfortified (-1.4 and -1.1 g/kg/d, respectively; P < .001). Similar patterns were observed for energy intake. Protein intake declined during phases 3 and 4.
Infants paradoxically received less protein and energy on days with early fortification, suggesting that clinicians may lack easily accessible data to detect the association between nutrition delivery practices and overall nutrition in infants who are VLBW.
评估极低出生体重儿(VLBW)从肠外营养向肠内营养过渡期间营养输送实践与能量和蛋白质摄入的关系。
这是对来自区域性新生儿重症监护病房的 115 名 VLBW 婴儿进行的回顾性分析。在过渡阶段 1(0%肠内);阶段 2(>0,≤33.3%肠内);阶段 3(>33.3,≤66.7%肠内);阶段 4(>66.7,<100%肠内);以及阶段 5(100%肠内)期间,估计能量和蛋白质的摄入变化。对于每个阶段的肠外营养、静脉内脂肪乳剂、中心静脉导管、喂养强化、液体限制和非营养性液体摄入过多,确定能量和蛋白质摄入之间的关联。
在阶段 2 和 3 中,接受喂养强化的婴儿摄入的蛋白质少于未强化的婴儿(分别为-1.1 和-0.3g/kg/d;P<.001)。然而,在调整了相关营养输送实践后,这种负相关关系并不明显。尽管在阶段 2 和 3 期间肠内蛋白质摄入增加(分别为 0.3 和 0.8g/kg/d;P<.001),但早期强化的婴儿接受的肠外蛋白质少于未强化的婴儿(分别为-1.4 和-1.1g/kg/d;P<.001)。能量摄入也出现了类似的模式。蛋白质摄入在阶段 3 和 4 期间下降。
婴儿在早期强化时摄入的蛋白质和能量反而减少,这表明临床医生可能缺乏易于获取的数据来检测营养输送实践与 VLBW 婴儿整体营养之间的关系。