Neural Engineering and Therapeutics Team, Toronto Rehabilitation Research Institute-University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Neural Engineering and Therapeutics Team, Toronto Rehabilitation Research Institute-University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Kinesiology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
J Clin Densitom. 2018 Oct-Dec;21(4):563-582. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2018.07.003. Epub 2018 Jul 29.
In 2015, the International Society for Clinical Densitometry (ISCD) position statement regarding peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) did not recommend routine use of pQCT, in clinical settings until consistency in image acquisition and analysis protocols are reached, normative studies conducted, and treatment thresholds identified. To date, the lack of consensus-derived recommendations regarding pQCT implementation remains a barrier to implementation of pQCT technology. Thus, based on description of available evidence and literature synthesis, this review recommends the most appropriate pQCT acquisition and analysis protocols for clinical care and research purposes, and recommends specific measures for diagnosis of osteoporosis, assigning fracture risk, and monitoring osteoporosis treatment effectiveness, among patients with neurological impairment. A systematic literature search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and PubMed for available pQCT studies assessing bone health was carried out from inception to August 8th, 2017. The search was limited to individuals with neurological impairment (spinal cord injury, stroke, and multiple sclerosis) as these groups have rapid and severe regional declines in bone mass. Of 923 references, we identified 69 that met review inclusion criteria. The majority of studies (n = 60) used the Stratec XCT 2000/3000 pQCT scanners as reflected in our evaluation of acquisition and analysis protocols. Overall congruence with the ISCD Official Positions was poor. Only 11% (n = 6) studies met quality reporting criteria for image acquisition and 32% (n = 19) reported their data analysis in a format suitable for reproduction. Therefore, based on current literature synthesis, ISCD position statement standards and the authors' expertise, we propose acquisition and analysis protocols at the radius, tibia, and femur sites using Stratec XCT 2000/3000 pQCT scanners among patients with neurological impairment for clinical and research purposes in order to drive practice change, develop normative datasets and complete future meta-analysis to inform fracture risk and treatment efficacy evaluation.
2015 年,国际临床骨密度学会(ISCD)关于外周定量计算机断层扫描(pQCT)的立场声明指出,在达成图像获取和分析协议的一致性、开展规范研究以及确定治疗阈值之前,pQCT 不建议在临床环境中常规使用。迄今为止,缺乏关于 pQCT 实施的共识推荐仍然是实施 pQCT 技术的障碍。因此,基于对现有证据和文献综述的描述,本综述为临床和研究目的推荐了最合适的 pQCT 采集和分析协议,并推荐了用于诊断骨质疏松症、评估骨折风险以及监测骨质疏松症治疗效果的具体措施,适用于患有神经功能障碍的患者。对 MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL 和 PubMed 进行了系统的文献检索,以评估评估骨骼健康的可用 pQCT 研究,检索时间从建库到 2017 年 8 月 8 日。搜索范围仅限于患有神经功能障碍的个体(脊髓损伤、中风和多发性硬化症),因为这些群体的骨量迅速且严重地下降。在 923 篇参考文献中,我们确定了符合审查纳入标准的 69 篇。大多数研究(n=60)使用 Stratec XCT 2000/3000 pQCT 扫描仪,这反映在我们对采集和分析协议的评估中。总体上与 ISCD 官方立场的一致性很差。只有 11%(n=6)的研究符合图像采集的质量报告标准,32%(n=19)的研究以适合复制的格式报告了他们的数据分析结果。因此,基于目前的文献综述、ISCD 立场声明标准和作者的专业知识,我们建议在患有神经功能障碍的患者中使用 Stratec XCT 2000/3000 pQCT 扫描仪,在桡骨、胫骨和股骨部位采集和分析数据,以便进行临床和研究,以推动实践的改变,开发规范数据集并完成未来的荟萃分析,为骨折风险和治疗效果评估提供信息。