Naguib Sara, Derner Brian, Meyr Andrew J
Resident, Temple University Hospital Podiatric Surgical Residency Program, Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Student, Temple University School of Podiatric Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2018 Nov-Dec;57(6):1140-1142. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2018.05.009. Epub 2018 Sep 7.
LaPorta et al published a description of measurement of the mechanical axis of the first ray in an attempt to introduce center-of-rotation angulation principles into forefoot reconstructive surgery. They found significant differences in the measurement of the first intermetatarsal angle between groups of feet with and without hallux abducto valgus deformity, but they found no difference in the measurement of the M1-M2 mechanical axis angle between groups. The objectives of this study were to further investigate the proposed M1-M2 mechanical axis angle and to examine the effect of hallux abducto valgus corrective surgery on its measurement. We retrospectively evaluated weight-bearing dorsal-plantar projection radiographs taken in the angle and base of gait of 56 consecutive feet before and after first metatarsal-phalangeal joint corrective surgery. On each radiograph, we calculated the first intermetatarsal angle, the hallux abductus angle, the tibial sesamoid position, the M1-M2 mechanical axis angle, and the position of the sesamoids relative to the mechanical axis of the medial column. Statistically significant decreases were observed when comparing pre- versus post-operative measurement of the first intermetatarsal angle (-4.83°; p < .001), hallux abductus angle (-11.46°; p < .001), and tibial sesamoid position (-1.99 positional grade; p < .001). Statistically significant differences were also observed for the M1-M2 mechanical axis angle (-0.47°; p = .007) and the position of the sesamoids relative to the mechanical axis of the medial column (0.38 positional grade; p < .001), but it is unlikely that these results would be considered clinically significant given the differences of less than 1° and less than 1 positional grade, respectfully. The results of this investigation add to the body of knowledge and will hopefully lead to future investigations into the progression, evaluation, and treatment of the hallux abducto valgus deformity.
拉波塔等人发表了一篇关于测量第一跖骨机械轴的描述,试图将旋转中心成角原理引入前足重建手术。他们发现,有和没有拇外翻畸形的足部组之间,第一跖骨间角的测量存在显著差异,但两组之间的M1-M2机械轴角测量没有差异。本研究的目的是进一步研究提出的M1-M2机械轴角,并检查拇外翻矫正手术对其测量的影响。我们回顾性评估了56只连续足部在第一跖趾关节矫正手术前后,在步态角度和基底拍摄的负重背-底位X线片。在每张X线片上,我们计算了第一跖骨间角、拇外展角、胫骨籽骨位置、M1-M2机械轴角,以及籽骨相对于内侧柱机械轴的位置。比较术前和术后第一跖骨间角(-4.83°;p <.001)、拇外展角(-11.46°;p <.001)和胫骨籽骨位置(-1.99位置等级;p <.001)的测量值时,观察到有统计学意义的下降。对于M1-M2机械轴角(-0.47°;p =.007)和籽骨相对于内侧柱机械轴的位置(0.38位置等级;p <.001)也观察到有统计学意义的差异,但考虑到差异分别小于1°和小于1个位置等级,这些结果不太可能被认为具有临床意义。本研究结果增加了知识体系,有望引发对拇外翻畸形进展、评估和治疗的未来研究。