Division of Cardiology, Yeungnam University Medical Center, Yeungnam University College of Medicine.
Department of Cardiology, Daegu Catholic University Medical Center.
Circ J. 2018 Oct 25;82(11):2745-2752. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-18-0619. Epub 2018 Sep 7.
There are few data of clinical outcomes after drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty according to neointimal characteristics. This study investigated long-term clinical outcomes according to timing of in-stent restenosis (ISR) and neointimal characteristics in patients with drug-eluting stent (DES) ISR after DCB angioplasty.
In all, 122 patients (122 ISR lesions), treated with DCB under optical coherence tomography (OCT) examination before and after DCB, were categorized as early ISR (<12 months; E-ISR; n=21) and late ISR (≥12 months; L-ISR; n=101). Associations between OCT-based neointima characteristics and period of ISR, as well as clinical outcomes after DCB were evaluated. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were a composite of cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or target lesion revascularization (TLR). Quantitative parameters of the neointima were similar, but qualitative characteristics showed significant differences between the E-ISR and L-ISR groups. The incidence of MACE (33.3% vs. 20.8%; P=0.069) and TLR (33.3% vs. 18.5%; P=0.040) was higher in the E-ISR group. In addition, the incidence of MACE was significantly higher for heterogeneous than non-heterogeneous neointima (43.7% vs. 19.6%; P=0.018), but was not significantly associated with neoatherosclerosis (33.4% vs. 18.4%; P=0.168).
DCB angioplasty is less effective for heterogeneous neointima in DES ISR. OCT-based neointimal evaluation may be helpful in guiding treatment of DES ISR.
根据新生内膜特征,药物涂层球囊(DCB)血管成形术后的临床结果数据较少。本研究根据药物洗脱支架(DES)ISR 后 DCB 血管成形术后的支架内再狭窄(ISR)时间和新生内膜特征,探讨了长期临床结果。
共有 122 名患者(122 个 ISR 病变),在 DCB 前后接受光学相干断层扫描(OCT)检查,分为早期 ISR(<12 个月;E-ISR;n=21)和晚期 ISR(≥12 个月;L-ISR;n=101)。评估了基于 OCT 的新生内膜特征与 ISR 期间以及 DCB 后临床结果之间的相关性。主要不良心脏事件(MACE)是心脏死亡、非致死性心肌梗死或靶病变血运重建(TLR)的综合表现。新生内膜的定量参数相似,但定性特征在 E-ISR 和 L-ISR 组之间存在显著差异。E-ISR 组的 MACE(33.3% vs. 20.8%;P=0.069)和 TLR(33.3% vs. 18.5%;P=0.040)发生率较高。此外,不均匀新生内膜的 MACE 发生率明显高于非均匀新生内膜(43.7% vs. 19.6%;P=0.018),但与新生动脉粥样硬化(33.4% vs. 18.4%;P=0.168)无显著相关性。
DCB 血管成形术对 DES ISR 中的不均匀新生内膜效果较差。基于 OCT 的新生内膜评估可能有助于指导 DES ISR 的治疗。