Koopman Jason F L, Kuik Onno, Tol Richard S J, Brouwer Roy
1Department of Environmental Economics, Institute for Environmental Studies, VU University Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1087, 1081HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
2Department of Economics, University of Sussex, Sussex, UK.
Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang. 2017;22(2):325-347. doi: 10.1007/s11027-015-9662-z. Epub 2015 Jun 11.
One of the climate change scenarios that have been developed for the Netherlands predicts hotter and drier summers and a substantial drop in river discharge. This might lead to water scarcity with detrimental economic and environmental effects. Among the possible adaptation responses to climate change-induced water scarcity, the re-allocation of water resources among competing uses should also be considered. In this paper, we extend and apply a computable general equilibrium (CGE) model to assess the potential of water markets (water allocation according to its shadow price) to guide the allocation of scarce water across agriculture, manufacturing, and public water supply. We develop four scenarios in which the scope of water markets is increased from industry-specific to economy-wide. The results show that the agricultural sector bears nearly all of the losses from a new water-scarce climate, while the manufacturing sectors are able to mitigate their losses to a large extent by technical measures. Extending the scope of water markets unambiguously increases economic output and results in a re-allocation of water to the manufacturing sector from the agricultural sector and from public water services. If, perhaps for political reasons, public water services are excluded from water trading, water is re-allocated from agriculture to manufacturing. Depending on which sectors are included, the construction of a water market can have negative or positive effects on a sector's output, and although the implementation of water markets may be positive for overall economic output and can hence assist adaptation, the effect on vulnerable or societally sensitive economic sectors, such as public water, should be taken into account when implementing such a market.
为荷兰制定的气候变化情景之一预测,夏季将变得更炎热干燥,河流流量大幅下降。这可能导致水资源短缺,对经济和环境产生不利影响。在应对气候变化导致的水资源短缺的可能适应措施中,还应考虑在相互竞争的用途之间重新分配水资源。在本文中,我们扩展并应用了一个可计算一般均衡(CGE)模型,以评估水市场(根据影子价格分配水)在引导稀缺水资源在农业、制造业和公共供水之间分配的潜力。我们制定了四种情景,其中水市场的范围从特定行业扩大到整个经济。结果表明,农业部门几乎承担了新的缺水气候带来的所有损失,而制造业能够通过技术措施在很大程度上减轻损失。扩大水市场的范围无疑会增加经济产出,并导致水资源从农业部门和公共供水服务重新分配到制造业。如果出于政治原因,公共供水服务被排除在水交易之外,水将从农业重新分配到制造业。根据所包括的部门不同,水市场的构建对一个部门的产出可能产生负面或正面影响,尽管水市场的实施可能对总体经济产出有利,从而有助于适应,但在实施这样一个市场时,应考虑对脆弱或对社会敏感的经济部门,如公共供水的影响。