Maimaitiaili Amina, Wu Di, Liu Zhenyu, Liu Haimeng, Muyiduli Xiamusiye, Fan Zhimin
Department of Breast Surgery, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China.
Department of Epidemiology & Health Statistics, School of Public Health, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China.
Cancer Biol Med. 2018 Aug;15(3):282-289. doi: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2018.0023.
Axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) may be unnecessary in 20%-60% of breast cancer patients with sentinel lymph node (NSLN) metastasis. The aim of the present study was to review the medical records of Chinese patients with early-stage breast cancer and positive NSLN metastasis to identify clinicopathological characteristics as risk factors for non-NSLN metastasis.
The medical records of 2008 early-stage breast cancer patients who received intraoperative sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) between 2006 and 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. These patients were clinically and radiologically lymph node-negative and had no prior history of receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy or endocrinotherapy. The clinicopathological characteristics of patients with positive NSLN metastasis who underwent ALND were investigated.
In the present study, 296 patients with positive NSLN metastases underwent ALND. Positive non-NSLN metastases were confirmed in 95 patients (32.1%). On univariate analysis, ≥ 3 positive NSLN metastases ( <0.01), NSLN macrometastases ( = 0.023), and lymphovascular invasion ( = 0.04) were associated with non-NSLN metastasis ( <0.05). In multivariate analysis, the number of positive SLNs was the most significant predictor of non-SLN metastasis. For patients with 0, 1, 2, or 3 associated risk factors, the non-SLN metastatic rates were 11.5%, 22.5%, 35.2%, and 73.1%, respectively.
The number of positive NSLNs, NSLN macrometastases, and lymphovascular invasion were correlated with non-SLN metastasis. The number of positive SLNs was an independent predictor for non-NSLN metastasis. When 2 or 3 risk factors were present in one patient, the probability of non-NSLN was higher than that in the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0011 trial (27.3%); thus, avoiding ALND should be considered carefully.
在20%-60%前哨淋巴结(SLN)转移的乳腺癌患者中,腋窝淋巴结清扫术(ALND)可能并无必要。本研究旨在回顾中国早期乳腺癌且SLN转移阳性患者的病历,以确定作为非前哨淋巴结转移风险因素的临床病理特征。
回顾性分析2008例在2006年至2016年间接受术中前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB)的早期乳腺癌患者的病历。这些患者临床及影像学检查淋巴结均为阴性,且既往无接受新辅助化疗或内分泌治疗史。对接受ALND的SLN转移阳性患者的临床病理特征进行研究。
在本研究中,296例SLN转移阳性患者接受了ALND。95例(32.1%)患者证实有非前哨淋巴结转移阳性。单因素分析显示,≥3枚SLN转移阳性(P<0.01)、SLN大包块转移(P = 0.023)及淋巴管侵犯(P = 0.04)与非前哨淋巴结转移相关(P<0.05)。多因素分析显示,阳性SLN数量是预测非前哨淋巴结转移的最显著因素。对于有0、1、2或3个相关风险因素的患者,非前哨淋巴结转移率分别为11.5%、22.5%、35.2%和73.1%。
阳性SLN数量、SLN大包块转移及淋巴管侵犯与非前哨淋巴结转移相关。阳性SLN数量是预测非前哨淋巴结转移的独立因素。当一名患者存在2个或3个风险因素时,非前哨淋巴结转移的概率高于美国外科医师学会肿瘤学组Z0011试验中的概率(27.3%);因此,应谨慎考虑避免行ALND。