Farisco Michele, Salles Arleen, Evers Kathinka
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2018 Oct;27(4):717-727. doi: 10.1017/S0963180118000208.
In this article, we begin by identifying three main neuroethical approaches: neurobioethics, empirical neuroethics, and conceptual neuroethics. Our focus is on conceptual approaches that generally emphasize the need to develop and use a methodological modus operandi for effectively linking scientific (i.e., neuroscience) and philosophical (i.e., ethics) interpretations. We explain and assess the value of conceptual neuroethics approaches and explain and defend one such approach that we propose as being particularly fruitful for addressing the various issues raised by neuroscience: fundamental neuroethics.
在本文中,我们首先确定三种主要的神经伦理学方法:神经生物伦理学、实证神经伦理学和概念神经伦理学。我们关注的是概念性方法,这些方法通常强调需要开发和使用一种方法论操作方式,以有效地将科学(即神经科学)解释与哲学(即伦理学)解释联系起来。我们解释并评估概念神经伦理学方法的价值,并解释和捍卫我们提出的一种特别有助于解决神经科学引发的各种问题的方法:基础神经伦理学。