Department of Medical Physics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, 8200, Denmark.
Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU Munich), Garching bei München, 85748, Germany.
Med Phys. 2018 Nov;45(11):4916-4926. doi: 10.1002/mp.13175. Epub 2018 Oct 8.
To demonstrate a proof-of-concept for fast cone-beam CT (CBCT) intensity correction in projection space by the use of deep learning.
The CBCT scans and corresponding projections were acquired from 30 prostate cancer patients. Reference shading correction was performed using a validated method (CBCT ), which estimates scatter and other low-frequency deviations in the measured CBCT projections on the basis of a prior CT image obtained from warping the planning CT to the CBCT. A convolutional neural network (ScatterNet) was designed, consisting of an attenuation conversion stage followed by a shading correction stage using a UNet-like architecture. The combined network was trained in 2D, utilizing pairs of measured and corrected projections of the reference method, in order to perform shading correction in projection space before reconstruction. The number of patients used for training, testing, and evaluation was 15, 7, and 8, respectively. The reconstructed CBCT was compared to CBCT in terms of mean and absolute errors (ME and MAE) for the eight evaluation patients (not included in the network training). Volumetric modulated arc photon therapy (VMAT) and intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) plans were generated on CBCT . Dose was recalculated on CBCT to evaluate its dosimetric accuracy. Single-field uniform dose proton plans were utilized for proton range comparison of CBCT and CBCT .
The CBCT showed no cupping artifacts and a considerably smaller MAE and ME with respect to CBCT than the uncorrected CBCT (on average 144 Hounsfield units (HU) vs 46 HU for MAE and 138 HU vs -3 HU for ME). The pass-rates using a 2% dose-difference criterion at 50% dose cut-off, were close to 100% for the VMAT plans of all patients when comparing CBCT to CBCT . For IMPT plans pass-rates were clearly lower, ranging from 15% to 81%. Proton range differences of up to 5 mm occurred.
Using a deep convolutional neural network for CBCT intensity correction was shown to be feasible in the pelvic region for the first time. Dose calculation accuracy on CBCT was high for VMAT, but unsatisfactory for IMPT. With respect to the reference technique (CBCT ), the neural network enabled a considerable increase in speed for intensity correction and might eventually allow for on-the-fly shading correction during CBCT acquisition.
通过使用深度学习,在投影空间演示快速锥形束 CT(CBCT)强度校正的概念验证。
从 30 名前列腺癌患者中获取 CBCT 扫描和相应的投影。使用经过验证的方法(CBCT )进行参考阴影校正,该方法基于从规划 CT 变形到 CBCT 的先验 CT 图像,估计测量的 CBCT 投影中的散射和其他低频偏差。设计了一个卷积神经网络(ScatterNet),由衰减转换阶段和使用类似于 UNet 的架构的阴影校正阶段组成。该联合网络在 2D 中进行训练,利用参考方法的测量和校正投影对进行训练,以便在重建前在投影空间中进行阴影校正。用于训练、测试和评估的患者数量分别为 15、7 和 8。在未包含在网络训练中的 8 名评估患者中,比较了重建的 CBCT 与 CBCT 之间的均值和绝对误差(ME 和 MAE)。在 CBCT 上生成容积调制弧形光子治疗(VMAT)和强度调制质子治疗(IMPT)计划。在 CBCT 上重新计算剂量以评估其剂量准确性。利用质子范围比较的单野均匀剂量质子计划,对 CBCT 和 CBCT 的质子范围进行比较。
与未经校正的 CBCT 相比,CBCT 显示无杯状伪影,MAE 和 ME 明显较小(平均 MAE 为 144 亨氏单位(HU),而 CBCT 为 46 HU,ME 为 138 HU,而 CBCT 为-3 HU)。当比较 CBCT 与 CBCT 时,所有患者的 VMAT 计划使用 2%剂量差异标准和 50%剂量截止时,通过率接近 100%。对于 IMPT 计划,通过率明显较低,范围为 15%至 81%。质子范围差异高达 5 毫米。
首次在盆腔区域使用深度卷积神经网络进行 CBCT 强度校正被证明是可行的。对于 VMAT,CBCT 上的剂量计算准确性很高,但 IMPT 不理想。与参考技术(CBCT )相比,神经网络大大提高了强度校正的速度,并且最终可能允许在 CBCT 采集期间实时进行阴影校正。