Suppr超能文献

与美国泌尿外科学会(AUA)风险分层相比,欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(EORTC)风险表更适用于中国非肌层浸润性膀胱癌患者。

EORTC risk tables are more suitable for Chinese patients with nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer than AUA risk stratification.

作者信息

Wang Hui, Ding Weihong, Jiang Guangliang, Gou Yuancheng, Sun Chuanyu, Chen Zhongqing, Xu Ke, Xia Guowei

机构信息

Department of Urology Department of Pathology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Sep;97(36):e12006. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000012006.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) need accurate estimations of the risk of recurrence and progression. Physicians can offer individualized therapy after identifying high-risk tumors. In our study, we compared the applicability of European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) risk tables and American Urological Association (AUA) risk stratification in Chinese patients with NMIBC.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied 301 patients with NMIBC who underwent transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) between October 2000 and July 2009 at Huashan Hospital of Fudan University and analyzed their parameters. The recurrence and progression rates at 1 and 5 years postoperatively were calculated along with 95% confidence intervals. We compared them with results obtained from the EORTC risk tables and AUA risk stratification. P values <.05 were considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

The median patient age was 67 years (21-92 years) and the median follow-up duration was 46 months (2-151 months). We used EORTC risk tables to classify patients into 3 groups, depending on whether they suffered recurrence or progression after TURBT. Kaplan-Meier curves showed significant differences among the 3 recurrence-free survival (RFS) levels (P < .0001, log-rank test) and among the 3 progression-free survival (PFS) levels (P < .0001, log-rank test). AUA risk stratification showed the same results. Both classifications were suitable to predict recurrence and progression in Chinese patients. However, for high-risk patients in both series, Kaplan-Meier curves showed significant differences between RFS levels (P < .0001, log-rank test) and between PFS levels (P < .0001, log-rank test). EORTC risk tables were stricter and AUA was more sensitive in assigning patients to a high-risk group.

CONCLUSION

EORTC risk tables are better than AUA risk stratification for predicting recurrence and progression in Chinese patients with NMIBC, especially among high-risk patients.

摘要

背景

非肌层浸润性膀胱癌(NMIBC)患者需要准确评估复发和进展风险。医生在识别高危肿瘤后可提供个体化治疗。在我们的研究中,我们比较了欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(EORTC)风险表和美国泌尿外科学会(AUA)风险分层在中国NMIBC患者中的适用性。

方法

我们回顾性研究了2000年10月至2009年7月在复旦大学附属华山医院接受经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术(TURBT)的301例NMIBC患者,并分析了他们的参数。计算术后1年和5年的复发率和进展率以及95%置信区间。我们将它们与从EORTC风险表和AUA风险分层获得的结果进行比较。P值<.05被认为具有统计学意义。

结果

患者中位年龄为67岁(21 - 92岁),中位随访时间为46个月(2 - 151个月)。我们使用EORTC风险表根据患者在TURBT后是否复发或进展将其分为3组。Kaplan-Meier曲线显示3个无复发生存(RFS)水平之间存在显著差异(P <.0001,对数秩检验),3个无进展生存(PFS)水平之间也存在显著差异(P <.0001,对数秩检验)。AUA风险分层显示了相同的结果。两种分类都适合预测中国患者的复发和进展。然而,对于两个系列中的高危患者,Kaplan-Meier曲线显示RFS水平之间存在显著差异(P <.0001,对数秩检验),PFS水平之间也存在显著差异(P <.0001,对数秩检验)。EORTC风险表在将患者分配到高危组方面更严格,而AUA更敏感。

结论

对于预测中国NMIBC患者的复发和进展,尤其是高危患者,EORTC风险表优于AUA风险分层。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d920/6133586/b167c129246a/medi-97-e12006-g005.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验