Shang Xiaojuan, Chen Luquan, Litscher Gerhard, Sun Yanxia, Pan Chuxiong, Liu Cun-Zhi, Litscher Daniela, Wang Lu
Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100730, China.
TCM Research Center Graz, Research Unit of Biomedical Engineering in Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, and Research Unit for Complementary and Integrative Laser Medicine, Medical University of Graz, 8036 Graz, Austria.
Medicines (Basel). 2018 Aug 31;5(3):95. doi: 10.3390/medicines5030095.
Lifestyle risks for myopia are well known and the disease has become a major global public health issue worldwide. There is a relation between reading, writing, and computer work and the development of myopia. Within this prospective pilot study in 44 patients aged between 6 and 12 years with myopia we compared possible treatment effects of acupuncture or moxibustion. The diopters of the right and left eye were evaluated before and after the two treatment methods. Myopia was improved in 14 eyes of 13 patients (15.9%) within both complementary methods. Using acupuncture an improvement was observed in seven eyes from six patients out of 22 patients and a similar result (improvement in seven eyes from seven patients out of 22 patients) was noticed in the moxibustion group. The extent of improvement was better in the acupuncture group (p = 0.008 s., comparison before and after treatment); however, group analysis between acupuncture and moxibustion revealed no significant difference. Possible therapeutic aspects with the help of evidence-based complementary methods like acupuncture or moxibustion have not yet been investigated adequately in myopic patients. Our study showed that both acupuncture and moxibustion can improve myopia of young patients. Acupuncture seems to be more effective than moxibustion in treating myopia, however group analysis did not prove this trend. Therefore, further Big data studies are necessary to confirm or refute the preliminary results.
近视的生活方式风险众所周知,该疾病已成为全球主要的公共卫生问题。阅读、写作和电脑工作与近视的发展之间存在关联。在这项针对44名6至12岁近视患者的前瞻性试点研究中,我们比较了针灸或艾灸的可能治疗效果。在两种治疗方法前后评估了右眼和左眼的屈光度。在这两种辅助方法中,13名患者的14只眼睛(15.9%)的近视情况得到改善。在22名患者中,6名患者的7只眼睛通过针灸得到改善,艾灸组也有类似结果(22名患者中7名患者的7只眼睛得到改善)。针灸组的改善程度更好(p = 0.008,治疗前后比较);然而,针灸和艾灸之间的组间分析没有显示出显著差异。在近视患者中,尚未充分研究像针灸或艾灸这样基于证据的辅助方法的可能治疗效果。我们的研究表明,针灸和艾灸都可以改善年轻患者的近视。针灸在治疗近视方面似乎比艾灸更有效,然而组间分析并未证实这一趋势。因此,需要进一步的大数据研究来证实或反驳这些初步结果。