Suppr超能文献

论分子进化钟的优点与缺陷

On the virtues and pitfalls of the molecular evolutionary clock.

作者信息

Ayala F J

出版信息

J Hered. 1986 Jul-Aug;77(4):226-35. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a110227.

Abstract

"Informational" macromolecules--i.e., proteins and nucleic acids--have in their sequences a register of evolutionary history. Zuckerkandl and Pauling suggested in 1965 that these molecules might provide a "molecular clock" of evolution. The molecular clock would time evolutionary events and make it possible to reconstruct phylogenetic history--the branching relationships among lineages leading to modern species. Kimura's neutrality theory postulates that rates of molecular evolution are stochastically constant and, hence, that there is a molecular clock. A variety of tests have shown that molecular evolution does not behave like a stochastic clock. The variance in evolutionary rates is much too large and thus inconsistent with the neutrality theory. This, however, does not invalidate the clock, but rather leaves it without a theoretical foundation to anticipate its properties. Sequence comparisons show that molecular evolution is sufficiently regular to serve in many situations as a clock, but uncertainty concerning the properties of the clock (for example, about the circumstances that may yield large oscillations in substitution rates from time to time or from lineage to lineage) demands that it be used with caution. Few DNA or protein sequences are known from organisms that range from closely related, e.g., different mammals, to very remote, e.g., mammals and fungi. One example is cytochrome c, which has an acceptable clockwise behavior over the whole span, in spite of some irregularities. Another example is the copper-zinc superoxide dismutase (SOD), which behaves like a very erratic clock. The SOD average rate of amino acid substitution per 100 residues per 100 million years (MY) is 5.5 when fungi and animals are compared, 9.1 when comparisons are made between insects and mammals, and 27.8 when mammals are compared with each other. The question is which mode is more common over broad evolutionary spans: the regularity of cytochrome c or the capriciousness of SOD? Additional data sets will be required in order to obtain the answer and to develop expectations about the accuracy of the clock in particular instances. Until such data exist, conclusions solely based on the molecular clock are potentially fraught with error.

摘要

“信息性”大分子——即蛋白质和核酸——在其序列中记录着进化历史。祖克坎德尔和鲍林在1965年提出,这些分子可能提供一个进化的“分子钟”。分子钟可以为进化事件计时,并有可能重建系统发育史——导致现代物种的谱系之间的分支关系。木村的中性理论假定分子进化速率是随机恒定的,因此存在分子钟。各种测试表明,分子进化的表现并不像一个随机时钟。进化速率的方差太大,因此与中性理论不一致。然而,这并没有使分子钟失效,而是使其缺乏预测其特性的理论基础。序列比较表明,分子进化足够规律,在许多情况下可以作为时钟使用,但关于时钟特性的不确定性(例如,关于可能导致不同时间或不同谱系间替换率大幅波动的情况)要求谨慎使用它。从亲缘关系密切的生物(如不同的哺乳动物)到亲缘关系非常遥远的生物(如哺乳动物和真菌),很少有DNA或蛋白质序列是已知的。一个例子是细胞色素c,尽管存在一些不规则性,但它在整个范围内具有可接受的时钟样行为。另一个例子是铜锌超氧化物歧化酶(SOD),它的行为就像一个非常不稳定的时钟。当比较真菌和动物时,SOD每1亿年每100个残基的氨基酸替换平均速率为5.5;当比较昆虫和哺乳动物时,为9.1;当哺乳动物相互比较时,为27.8。问题是,在广泛的进化跨度中,哪种模式更常见:细胞色素c的规律性还是SOD的多变性?为了获得答案并对特定情况下时钟的准确性形成预期,还需要更多的数据集。在有这些数据之前,仅基于分子钟得出的结论可能充满错误。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验