Upper Limb Ischemic Postconditioning as Adjunct Therapy in Acute Stroke Patients: A Randomized Pilot.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to observe the clinical effect of upper limb ischemic postconditioning (LIPostC) as an adjunct to treatment with acute stroke patients, possibly due to increased cerebral perfusion.

METHODS

We perform a randomized blinded placebo controlled trial in nonthrombolysis patients with acute ischemic stroke, within 72hours of ictus, divided into the LIPostC group and control group. The LIPostC group is induced by 4 cycles of intermittent repeated limb ischemia: alternating 5 minutes inflation (20mm Hg above systolic blood pressure) and 5 minutes deflation performed manually using a standard upper arm blood pressure cuff in the nonparetic arm. The control group receives a sham procedure (cuff inflation to 30mm Hg). Patients underwent the intervention from the time of enrollment to Day 14. Comparison of National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score, cerebral infarction volume, relative Perfusion weighted imaging (PWI) parameters (regional relative cerebral blood flow, regional relative mean transit time; preintervention [day 0], day 14, day 90), modified Rankin Scale (mRS; the preintervention score [day 0], the curative ratio at day 90 [we define 0-1 score as close to recovery or full recovery]).

RESULTS

Sixty eligible patients with acute stroke (29 LIPostC and 31 control) are recruited age 65years (SD 12.22), blood pressure 156/74mm Hg (SD 14/10), and NIHSS score 5.98 (SD 3.35), mRS score 2.25 (SD .79). Only 1 in the LIPostC group is intolerant the first cycle to give up. All patients tolerate the sham procedure. Two patients experience recurrent stroke versus none in the LIPostC group. Day 90, compared with the control group, there is a significant decrease the NIHSS score, regional relative mean transit time (P < .05) and increase the curative ratio of mRS, regional relative cerebral blood flow(P < .05) in the LIPostC group, which infarct volume decreased by 31.3% (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

LIPostC after acute stroke is well tolerated and appears safe and feasible. LIPostC may improve neurological outcome, and protective mechanisms may be increased cerebral blood flow to improve cerebral perfusion. A larger trial is warranted.