Suppr超能文献

优化生活方式医学干预的强度:半数疗程可取得相似结果。

Optimizing the Intensity of Lifestyle Medicine Interventions: Similar Outcomes for Half the Sessions.

作者信息

Morton Darren P, Kent Lillian, Rankin Paul, Mitchell Brett, Parker Karina, Gobble John, Diehl Hans

机构信息

Lifestyle Research Centre, Avondale College of Higher Education, Cooranbong, New South Wales, Australia (DPM, LK, PR, BM, KP).

Medical Nutrition Therapy Northwest, Clackamas, Oregon (JG).

出版信息

Am J Lifestyle Med. 2015 Oct 23;11(3):274-279. doi: 10.1177/1559827615612420. eCollection 2017 May-Jun.

Abstract

Lifestyle medicine interventions are typically intensive by design. This study explored the optimal "dosage" of a well-known lifestyle medicine intervention-the Complete Health Improvement Program (CHIP). A total of 2383 individuals (mean age = 61.0 ± 9.2 years; 34% males) participated in either an 8-session (N = 448) or 16-session (N = 1935) version of the CHIP intervention conducted over 4 weeks in community settings throughout North America. Both the 8- and 16-session groups experienced significant improvements in all the chronic disease risk factors measured. There was no difference between the changes experienced by the 8- and 16-session groups in lipid profile, fasting plasma glucose, or systolic blood pressure. The 8-session group experienced a significantly greater reduction in body mass (0.3 percentage points or 0.8 lbs, P < .01), but the 16-session group recorded a significantly greater reduction in diastolic blood pressure (2.8 percentage points or 2.2 mm Hg, P < .01). There was no clear difference between the outcomes achieved in 4 weeks by the 8- and 16-session versions of the CHIP lifestyle medicine intervention. This study suggests that the short-term outcomes achieved by a 16-session CHIP intervention can be achieved in half the number of sessions, which has implications from a resourcing and cost-effectiveness perspective.

摘要

生活方式医学干预在设计上通常是高强度的。本研究探索了一种著名的生活方式医学干预——完全健康改善计划(CHIP)的最佳“剂量”。共有2383名个体(平均年龄 = 61.0 ± 9.2岁;34%为男性)参与了在北美各地社区环境中为期4周开展的8节课程(N = 448)或16节课程(N = 1935)的CHIP干预。8节课程组和16节课程组在所有测量的慢性病风险因素方面均有显著改善。8节课程组和16节课程组在血脂谱、空腹血糖或收缩压方面的变化没有差异。8节课程组的体重显著下降更多(0.3个百分点或0.8磅,P < .01),但16节课程组的舒张压显著下降更多(2.8个百分点或2.2毫米汞柱,P < .01)。CHIP生活方式医学干预的8节课程版和16节课程版在4周内取得的结果没有明显差异。本研究表明,16节课程的CHIP干预所取得的短期结果可以在课程数量减半的情况下实现,这从资源和成本效益的角度来看具有重要意义。

本文引用的文献

1
The Complete Health Improvement Program (CHIP): History, Evaluation, and Outcomes.
Am J Lifestyle Med. 2014 Apr 22;10(1):64-73. doi: 10.1177/1559827614531391. eCollection 2016 Jan-Feb.
2
4
Gender differences in effectiveness of the Complete Health Improvement Program (CHIP).
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2015 Jan-Feb;47(1):44-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2014.08.016. Epub 2014 Oct 11.
5
A way to reverse CAD?
J Fam Pract. 2014 Jul;63(7):356-364b.
8
The theory of planned behaviour: reactions and reflections.
Psychol Health. 2011 Sep;26(9):1113-27. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2011.613995.
9
Raising the priority of preventing chronic diseases: a political process.
Lancet. 2010 Nov 13;376(9753):1689-98. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61414-6.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验