Suppr超能文献

完全健康改善计划(CHIP)生活方式干预效果的性别差异:一项澳大拉西亚地区的研究。

Gender differences in effectiveness of the Complete Health Improvement Program (CHIP) lifestyle intervention: an Australasian study.

作者信息

Kent Lillian M, Morton Darren P, Rankin Paul M, Mitchell Brett G, Chang Esther, Diehl Hans

机构信息

Lifestyle Research Centre, Avondale College of Higher Education, 582 Freemans Drive (PO Box 19), Cooranbong, NSW 2265, Australia.

School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Western Sydney, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith NSW 2751, Australia.

出版信息

Health Promot J Austr. 2014 Dec;25(3):222-9. doi: 10.1071/HE14041.

Abstract

ISSUE ADDRESSED

Complete Health Improvement Program (CHIP) is a lifestyle modification program that promotes healthy diet, physical activity and stress management techniques. Among US CHIP participants, differences in gender responsiveness to improvements in chronic disease risk factors were demonstrated. This study examined gender differences in outcomes to the CHIP intervention in Australasia.

METHODS

Changes in body weight, blood pressure (BP), blood lipid profile and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) were assessed in 925 participants (34.3% men, mean age=56.0±12.5 years; 65.7% women, mean age=54.4±13.5 years) 30 days after program commencement.

RESULTS

Significant reductions (P<0.001) in all biometrics measured were found for men and women but were greater among men for total (TC) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL), triglycerides (TG), FPG, body mass index (BMI) and TC/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL) ratio. Participants with highest baseline classifications of BMI, systolic BP, blood lipids and FPG showed greatest reductions in 30 days.

CONCLUSIONS

CHIP more effectively reduced chronic disease risk factors among men than women. All participants, but particularly men, entering the program with the greatest risk achieved the largest reductions. Possible physiological or behavioural factors include food preferences, making commitments and differential support modes. SO WHAT?: Developers of lifestyle intervention programs should consider gender differences in physiological and behavioural factors when planning interventions. In particular, developers should manage expectations of people entering lifestyle interventions to increase awareness that men tend to respond better than women. In addition, this is a call for further research to identify the underlying mechanisms responsible for the disproportionate responsiveness of males.

摘要

研究的问题

完全健康改善计划(CHIP)是一项生活方式改善计划,旨在推广健康饮食、体育活动和压力管理技巧。在美国的CHIP参与者中,已证实慢性病风险因素改善方面存在性别反应差异。本研究调查了澳大拉西亚地区CHIP干预结果中的性别差异。

方法

在项目开始30天后,对925名参与者(34.3%为男性,平均年龄=56.0±12.5岁;65.7%为女性,平均年龄=54.4±13.5岁)的体重、血压(BP)、血脂谱和空腹血糖(FPG)变化进行了评估。

结果

男性和女性的所有测量生物特征指标均显著降低(P<0.001),但男性在总胆固醇(TC)、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL)、甘油三酯(TG)、FPG、体重指数(BMI)和TC/高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL)比值方面的降低幅度更大。基线时BMI、收缩压、血脂和FPG分类最高的参与者在30天内降低幅度最大。

结论

CHIP在男性中比在女性中更有效地降低了慢性病风险因素。所有参与者,尤其是风险最高的男性参与者,在进入该计划后降低幅度最大。可能的生理或行为因素包括食物偏好、做出承诺和不同的支持模式。那又如何?:生活方式干预计划的开发者在规划干预措施时应考虑生理和行为因素中的性别差异。特别是,开发者应管理参与生活方式干预者的期望,以提高人们对男性往往比女性反应更好的认识。此外,这呼吁进一步研究以确定导致男性反应不成比例的潜在机制。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验