University of Trieste, via dell'Istria 65/1, 34137, Trieste, Italy.
CRO Aviano National Cancer Institute, Aviano, Italy.
Eur J Pediatr. 2018 Dec;177(12):1753-1760. doi: 10.1007/s00431-018-3237-4. Epub 2018 Sep 10.
Children with intellectual disability frequently undergo needle-related procedures for diagnosis or treatment. Nevertheless, only a few studies deal with pain and distress management during the procedure in this population of children. This study aimed to investigate the number of anxiety and pain management techniques performed during needle procedure in children with intellectual disability (cases) compared to a population of children without intellectual disability (controls). This multicenter cohort study was performed from July 2016 to January 2018 in the pediatric ward of four urban hospitals in Italy. Eligible subjects were children with and without intellectual disability, from 4 to 17 years old, who needed venipuncture or intravenous cannulation for diagnosis or treatment. Use of topical anesthesia, distraction techniques, and physical or verbal comfort during procedures were recorded. Pain and anxiety scores were also recorded. Forty-seven cases and 94 controls were recruited. Three pain- and anxiety-relieving techniques were performed during the procedure in 12 (25%) cases and in 10 controls (11%); two techniques were performed in 23 (50%) cases and in 26 (28%) controls; 12 (25%) cases and 52 (55%) controls received only one.Conclusion: In this series, children with intellectual disability received significantly more relieving techniques, but experienced more pain and anxiety when compared to children without intellectual disability. What is Known: • Children with intellectual disability experience more episodes of pain than cognitively healthy ones, and almost 10% of these episodes are due to medical procedures. What is New: • Children with intellectual disability despite receiving more relieving techniques during a needle-related procedure experienced more pain and anxiety when compared to healthy children.
患有智力障碍的儿童经常需要进行与针相关的程序来进行诊断或治疗。然而,仅有少数研究涉及该人群在接受此类程序时的疼痛和不适管理。本研究旨在调查与无智力障碍的儿童(对照组)相比,患有智力障碍的儿童(病例组)在接受针相关程序时实施的焦虑和疼痛管理技术的数量。这是一项多中心队列研究,于 2016 年 7 月至 2018 年 1 月在意大利四个城市医院的儿科病房进行。合格的研究对象为需要进行静脉穿刺或静脉置管以进行诊断或治疗的 4 至 17 岁的有或无智力障碍的儿童。记录了在程序期间使用局部麻醉、分散注意力技术、身体或口头安慰的情况。还记录了疼痛和焦虑评分。共招募了 47 例病例和 94 例对照。在 12 例(25%)病例和 10 例(11%)对照中,在程序期间实施了 3 种缓解疼痛和焦虑的技术;在 23 例(50%)病例和 26 例(28%)对照中实施了 2 种技术;12 例(25%)病例和 52 例(55%)对照仅接受了 1 种技术。结论:在本系列中,智力障碍儿童接受的缓解技术明显更多,但与无智力障碍儿童相比,他们经历的疼痛和焦虑更多。已知情况:•患有智力障碍的儿童经历的疼痛发作比认知健康的儿童多,其中近 10%的疼痛发作是由于医疗程序引起的。新情况:•患有智力障碍的儿童尽管在接受与针相关的程序时接受了更多的缓解技术,但与健康儿童相比,他们经历的疼痛和焦虑更多。