• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阿奇霉素序贯疗法治疗儿童支原体肺炎的临床疗效

Clinical effect of sequential therapy with azithromycin in children mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia.

作者信息

Wang Jianlong, Yang Cun

机构信息

Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Jining No.1, Pepole's Hospital, Jining, China.

出版信息

Pak J Pharm Sci. 2018 Jul;31(4(Special)):1649-1652.

PMID:30203754
Abstract

In the present study, the clinical effect of Sequential Therapy with Azithromycin in children mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia is observed and analyzed. The 160 children who were diagnosed as mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia were selected as subjects. They were randomly divided into two groups: study group and reference group and each group with 80 cases. Among them, the children in study group were carried out sequential therapy of erythromycin and the sequential therapy of azithromycin in reference group. The overall treatment efficiency, the incidence of adverse reactions, the time of symptom recovery and hospitalization were compared between the two groups. Through comparing the efficiency of overall treatment between two groups, the study group has more significant advantages than reference group: P<0.05; through comparing the time of symptoms recovery and hospitalization, study group is significantly less than reference group: P<0.05; in addition, through comparing the incidence of adverse reactions, the difference between two groups is not obvious: P>0.05. For sequential therapy of azithromycin in children mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia, it can achieve good therapeutic effect and has no serious adverse reactions, which has tremendous applied values.

摘要

本研究对阿奇霉素序贯疗法治疗儿童支原体肺炎的临床效果进行观察与分析。选取160例确诊为支原体肺炎的儿童作为研究对象,随机分为两组:研究组和参照组,每组80例。其中,研究组患儿采用红霉素序贯疗法,参照组患儿采用阿奇霉素序贯疗法。比较两组的总体治疗有效率、不良反应发生率、症状恢复时间及住院时间。通过比较两组的总体治疗有效率,研究组比参照组具有更显著优势:P<0.05;通过比较症状恢复时间及住院时间,研究组明显短于参照组:P<0.05;此外,通过比较不良反应发生率,两组差异不明显:P>0.05。对于儿童支原体肺炎采用阿奇霉素序贯疗法,可取得良好治疗效果且无严重不良反应,具有巨大的应用价值。

相似文献

1
Clinical effect of sequential therapy with azithromycin in children mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia.阿奇霉素序贯疗法治疗儿童支原体肺炎的临床疗效
Pak J Pharm Sci. 2018 Jul;31(4(Special)):1649-1652.
2
Effects of a combination of erythromycin sequential therapy and azithromycin on lung function and inflammatory factors in children with severe mycoplasma pneumonia.红霉素序贯疗法联合阿奇霉素对重症肺炎支原体肺炎患儿肺功能及炎症因子的影响。
Pak J Pharm Sci. 2021 Nov;34(6(Special)):2447-2454.
3
[Clinical effect of Saccharomyces boulardii powder combined with azithromycin sequential therapy in treatment of children with diarrhea secondary to Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia].布拉氏酵母菌散联合阿奇霉素序贯疗法治疗支原体肺炎继发腹泻患儿的临床疗效
Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi. 2018 Feb;20(2):116-120. doi: 10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2018.02.007.
4
Safety and efficacy of azithromycin in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia in children.阿奇霉素治疗儿童社区获得性肺炎的安全性和有效性
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1998 Oct;17(10):865-71. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199810000-00004.
5
Effects of methylprednisolone or immunoglobulin when added to standard treatment with intravenous azithromycin for refractory Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia in children.甲泼尼龙或免疫球蛋白联合静脉用阿奇霉素治疗儿童难治性肺炎支原体肺炎的效果。
World J Pediatr. 2017 Aug;13(4):321-327. doi: 10.1007/s12519-017-0014-9. Epub 2017 Jan 27.
6
Macrolide use shortens fever duration in Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection in children: a 2-year experience.大环内酯类药物的使用可缩短儿童支原体肺炎感染的发热持续时间:一项为期两年的经验。
J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2008 Aug;41(4):307-10.
7
[The clinical characteristics, treatment and outcome of macrolide-resistant Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia in children].[儿童大环内酯类耐药肺炎支原体肺炎的临床特征、治疗及转归]
Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi. 2013 Oct;36(10):756-61.
8
Clinical efficacy enhancement of a Chinese herbal injection in the treatment of mycoplasma pneumonia in children: A protocol of randomized controlled trial.中药注射液治疗儿童肺炎支原体感染临床疗效的增强作用:一项随机对照试验方案。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Mar 26;100(12):e25135. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000025135.
9
Application value of erythromycin combined with azithromycin sequential therapy in the treatment of mycoplasma pneumonia in children.
Minerva Pediatr (Torino). 2022 Apr;74(2):247-249. doi: 10.23736/S2724-5276.21.06518-6. Epub 2021 Jul 15.
10
Azithromycin sequential therapy plus inhaled terbutaline for Mycoplasma Pneumoniae pneumonia in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.阿奇霉素序贯疗法联合特布他林吸入治疗儿童肺炎支原体肺炎的系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Infect Dis. 2024 Jun 28;24(1):653. doi: 10.1186/s12879-024-09564-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical Efficacy of Azithromycin in the Treatment of Pediatric Pneumonia and Its Impact on Platelet Count and D-Dimer Levels.阿奇霉素治疗小儿肺炎的临床疗效及其对血小板计数和D-二聚体水平的影响
Infect Drug Resist. 2024 Nov 25;17:5195-5202. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S477971. eCollection 2024.
2
Safety profiles and adverse reactions of azithromycin in the treatment of pediatric respiratory diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis.阿奇霉素治疗儿科呼吸道疾病的安全性特征和不良反应:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Dec 1;102(48):e36306. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000036306.
3
The value of lung ultrasound in assessing the degree of lesions in children with mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia.
肺部超声在评估支原体肺炎患儿病变程度中的价值。
Am J Transl Res. 2023 Mar 15;15(3):2175-2182. eCollection 2023.
4
Is the safety of azithromycin superior to other antibiotics in the treatment of infectious diseases in children?阿奇霉素在治疗儿童传染病方面的安全性是否优于其他抗生素?
Transl Pediatr. 2022 Apr;11(4):610-611. doi: 10.21037/tp-21-619.
5
Safety of azithromycin in pediatric infectious diseases: a clinical systematic review and meta-analysis.阿奇霉素在儿童传染病中的安全性:一项临床系统评价与荟萃分析。
Transl Pediatr. 2021 Oct;10(10):2594-2601. doi: 10.21037/tp-21-444.
6
Traditional Chinese Medicine Oral Liquids Combined With Azithromycin for Pneumonia in Children: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.中药口服液联合阿奇霉素治疗儿童肺炎:一项贝叶斯网络Meta分析
Front Pharmacol. 2021 May 28;12:652412. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.652412. eCollection 2021.