Chen Zhe, Shi Qingyang, Peng Yingying, Chen Yongjie, Cao Lujia, Pang Bo, Ji Zhaochen, Liu Chunxiang, Zhang Junhua
Evidence-Based Medicine Center, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China.
Department of Pediatrics, First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China.
Front Pharmacol. 2021 May 28;12:652412. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.652412. eCollection 2021.
pneumonia (MPP) causes flu-like symptoms in children, increasing the burden on the health and education systems. In China, traditional Chinese medicine oral liquids (TCMOLs) combined with azithromycin (TCMOLs + Azithromycin) is commonly used to treat MPP in children. However, TCMOLs with the optimal clinical applicability remain unknown. Here, we evaluated the clinical effectiveness and safety of TCMOLs + Azithromycin in children with MPP. We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Ovid, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Data Knowledge Service Platform, and VIP information resource integration service platform databases for eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published from database inception to October 2020. Two reviewers independently performed data extraction and risk of bias assessment. After Bayesian random effect modeling and surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) scoring, we ranked each intervention. We assessed heterogeneity using multivariate meta-regression for potential modifiers and used the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation to rate pooled evidence's certainty. In the 63 included RCTs with 6,410 children, five different TCMOLs were combined with azithromycin. TCMOLs + Azithromycin had significantly better primary outcomes than did azithromycin alone. Of all TCMOLs, Xiaoer Xiaoji Zhike (XEXJZK)+Azithromycin showed the best effectiveness with respect to the response rate (odds ratio [OR] = 6.5, 95% credible interval [CrI] = 4.3-10; low certainty) and pulmonary rales disappearance time (mean difference [MD] = -2.1, 95% CrI: -2.9 to -1.2; low certainty) with SUCRA 85 and 80%, respectively. Pudilan Xiaoyan + Azithromycin showed the highest effectiveness with respect to cough disappearance time (MD = -2.6, 95% CrI: -3.4 to -1.7; very low certainty) and fever disappearance time (MD = -1.8, 95% CrI: -2.3 to -1.3; very low certainty) with SUCRA 87 and 87%, respectively. The difference in the adverse effects between TCMOLs + Azithromycin and azithromycin alone was nonsignificant. Of the different TCMOLs, XEXJZK may be the best option to combine with azithromycin to treat children with MPP. However, our results should be interpreted with caution due to the low certainty of evidence. In general, TCMOLs' safety remains unclear because of a lack of evidence. More high-quality RCTs are needed to further evaluate efficacy and safety of these TCMOLs.
支原体肺炎(MPP)会导致儿童出现类似流感的症状,加重了卫生和教育系统的负担。在中国,中药口服液(TCMOLs)联合阿奇霉素(TCMOLs + 阿奇霉素)常用于治疗儿童MPP。然而,临床适用性最佳的中药口服液仍不明确。在此,我们评估了TCMOLs + 阿奇霉素治疗儿童MPP的临床有效性和安全性。我们检索了PubMed、Embase、Cochrane图书馆、Ovid、Web of Science、中国知网(CNKI)、万方数据知识服务平台和维普资讯资源整合服务平台数据库,以查找从数据库建立至2020年10月发表的符合条件的随机对照试验(RCTs)。两名评审员独立进行数据提取和偏倚风险评估。经过贝叶斯随机效应建模和累积排序曲线下面积(SUCRA)评分后,我们对每种干预措施进行了排名。我们使用多变量meta回归评估潜在修饰因素的异质性,并使用推荐分级、评估、制定和评价(GRADE)来评定汇总证据的确定性。在纳入的63项RCTs中,有6410名儿童,5种不同的中药口服液与阿奇霉素联合使用。TCMOLs + 阿奇霉素的主要结局显著优于单独使用阿奇霉素。在所有中药口服液中,小儿消积止咳(XEXJZK)+ 阿奇霉素在缓解率(优势比[OR] = 6.5,95%可信区间[CrI] = 4.3 - 10;低确定性)和肺部啰音消失时间(平均差[MD] = -2.1,95% CrI:-2.9至-1.2;低确定性)方面显示出最佳疗效,SUCRA分别为85%和80%。蒲地蓝消炎 + 阿奇霉素在咳嗽消失时间(MD = -2.6,95% CrI:-3.4至-1.7;极低确定性)和发热消失时间(MD = -1.8,95% CrI:-2.3至-1.3;极低确定性)方面显示出最高疗效,SUCRA分别为87%和87%。TCMOLs + 阿奇霉素与单独使用阿奇霉素之间的不良反应差异不显著。在不同的中药口服液中,XEXJZK可能是与阿奇霉素联合治疗儿童MPP的最佳选择。然而,由于证据的确定性较低,我们的结果应谨慎解读。总体而言,由于缺乏证据,中药口服液的安全性仍不明确。需要更多高质量的RCTs来进一步评估这些中药口服液的疗效和安全性。