Folkman Scott J, Soriano-Lopez Joaquin, Galán-Mascarós José Ramón, Finke Richard G
Chemistry Department , Colorado State University , Fort Collins , Colorado 80523 , United States.
Institute of Chemical Research of Catalonia (ICIQ) , The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology (BIST) , Av Països Catalans 16 , E-43007 Tarragona , Spain.
J Am Chem Soc. 2018 Sep 26;140(38):12040-12055. doi: 10.1021/jacs.8b06303. Epub 2018 Sep 11.
A series of six exemplary cobalt-polyoxometalate (Co-POM) precatalysts have been examined to determine if they are molecular water-oxidation catalysts (WOCatalysts) or if, instead, they actually form heterogeneous, electrode-bound CoO as the true WOCatalyst under electrochemically driven water-oxidation catalysis (WOCatalysis) conditions. Specifically, WOCatalysis derived from the following six Co-POMs has been examined at pH 5.8, 8.0, and 9.0: [Co(HO)(PWO)] (CoPW), [Co(HO)(OH)(HPO)(PWO)] (CoPW), [ ββ-Co(HO)(PWO)] (CoPW), [Co(HO)PWO] (CoPW), [α-Co(HO)PWO] (α-CoPW), and [α-Co(HO)PWO] (α-CoPW). The amount of Co(II) in 500 μM solutions of each Co-POM was measured after 3 h of aging as well as from t = 0 for pH = 5.8 and 8.0 by μM sensitive Co(II)-induced P NMR line broadening and at pH = 9.0 by cathodic stripping. The amount of detectable Co(II) after 3 h for the six Co-POMs ranges from ∼0.25 to ∼90% of the total cobalt initially present in the Co-POM. For 12 out of 18 total Co-POM and different pH cases, the amount Co(II) detected after 3 h forms heterogeneous CoO able to account for ≥100% of the observed WOCatalysis activity. However, under 0.1 M NaPi, pH 5.8 conditions for CoPW and α-CoPW where ∼1.5% and 0.25% Co(II) is detectable, the measured Co(II) cannot account for the observed WOCatalysis. The implication is that these two Co-POMs are primarily molecular, Co-POM-based, WOCatalysts under electrochemically driven, pH 5.8, phosphate-buffer conditions. Even for the single most stable Co-POM, α-CoPW, CoO is still an estimated ∼76× faster WOCatalyst at pH = 5.8 and an estimated ∼740× faster WOCatalyst at pH = 8.
研究了一系列六种典型的钴-多金属氧酸盐(Co-POM)预催化剂,以确定它们是否为分子水氧化催化剂(WOCatalysts),或者相反,在电化学驱动的水氧化催化(WOCatalysis)条件下,它们是否实际上形成了非均相的、电极结合的CoO作为真正的WOCatalyst。具体而言,已在pH 5.8、8.0和9.0条件下研究了源自以下六种Co-POM的WOCatalysis:[Co(HO)(PWO)](CoPW)、[Co(HO)(OH)(HPO)(PWO)](CoPW)、[ββ-Co(HO)(PWO)](CoPW)、[Co(HO)PWO](CoPW)、[α-Co(HO)PWO](α-CoPW)和[α-Co(HO)PWO](α-CoPW)。通过μM敏感的Co(II)诱导的P NMR线宽展,在老化3小时后以及在pH = 5.8和8.0时从t = 0开始测量每种Co-POM的500 μM溶液中的Co(II)含量,在pH = 9.0时通过阴极溶出法测量。六种Co-POM在3小时后可检测到的Co(II)量占Co-POM中最初存在的总钴量的约0.25%至约90%。在总共18种Co-POM和不同pH情况中的12种情况下,3小时后检测到的Co(II)量形成了能够解释≥100%观察到的WOCatalysis活性的非均相CoO。然而,在0.1 M NaPi、pH 5.8条件下,对于CoPW和α-CoPW,可检测到约1.5%和0.25%的Co(II),测量到的Co(II)无法解释观察到的WOCatalysis。这意味着在电化学驱动的、pH 5.8、磷酸盐缓冲条件下,这两种Co-POM主要是基于分子Co-POM的WOCatalysts。即使对于最稳定的单一Co-POM,α-CoPW,在pH = 5.8时,CoO仍然是估计快约76倍的WOCatalyst,在pH = 8时是估计快约740倍的WOCatalyst。