Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708.
Duke Center for Genomic and Computational Biology, Proteomics and Metabolomics Shared Resource, Durham, NC 27701.
Mol Biol Cell. 2018 Nov 1;29(22):2644-2655. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E18-04-0255. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
In the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, transcription factors (TFs) regulate the periodic expression of many genes during the cell cycle, including gene products required for progression through cell-cycle events. Experimental evidence coupled with quantitative models suggests that a network of interconnected TFs is capable of regulating periodic genes over the cell cycle. Importantly, these dynamical models were built on transcriptomics data and assumed that TF protein levels and activity are directly correlated with mRNA abundance. To ask whether TF transcripts match protein expression levels as cells progress through the cell cycle, we applied a multiplexed targeted mass spectrometry approach (parallel reaction monitoring) to synchronized populations of cells. We found that protein expression of many TFs and cell-cycle regulators closely followed their respective mRNA transcript dynamics in cycling wild-type cells. Discordant mRNA/protein expression dynamics was also observed for a subset of cell-cycle TFs and for proteins targeted for degradation by E3 ubiquitin ligase complexes such as SCF (Skp1/Cul1/F-box) and APC/C (anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome). We further profiled mutant cells lacking B-type cyclin/CDK activity ( clb1-6) where oscillations in ubiquitin ligase activity, cyclin/CDKs, and cell-cycle progression are halted. We found that a number of proteins were no longer periodically degraded in clb1-6 mutants compared with wild type, highlighting the importance of posttranscriptional regulation. Finally, the TF complexes responsible for activating G1/S transcription (SBF and MBF) were more constitutively expressed at the protein level than at periodic mRNA expression levels in both wild-type and mutant cells. This comprehensive investigation of cell-cycle regulators reveals that multiple layers of regulation (transcription, protein stability, and proteasome targeting) affect protein expression dynamics during the cell cycle.
在 budding 酵母酿酒酵母中,转录因子(TFs)调节细胞周期中许多基因的周期性表达,包括细胞周期事件进展所需的基因产物。实验证据加上定量模型表明,相互连接的 TF 网络能够在细胞周期中调节周期性基因。重要的是,这些动态模型是基于转录组学数据构建的,并假设 TF 蛋白水平和活性与 mRNA 丰度直接相关。为了询问 TF 转录物是否与细胞通过细胞周期时的蛋白表达水平相匹配,我们应用了一种多重靶向质谱方法(平行反应监测)对同步化的细胞群体进行了研究。我们发现,许多 TF 和细胞周期调节剂的蛋白表达水平在循环野生型细胞中与各自的 mRNA 转录物动力学密切相关。细胞周期 TF 的一部分和靶蛋白的蛋白表达动力学也存在差异降解由 E3 泛素连接酶复合物(如 SCF(Skp1/Cul1/F-box)和 APC/C(有丝分裂促进复合物/细胞周期))靶向的蛋白质。我们进一步对缺乏 B 型细胞周期蛋白/CDK 活性(clb1-6)的突变细胞进行了分析,其中泛素连接酶活性、细胞周期蛋白/CDK 和细胞周期进展的振荡停止。我们发现,与野生型相比,clb1-6 突变体中许多蛋白质不再周期性降解,这突出了转录后调节的重要性。最后,在野生型和突变细胞中,负责激活 G1/S 转录的 TF 复合物(SBF 和 MBF)在蛋白水平上的表达比在周期性 mRNA 表达水平上更为组成型。对细胞周期调节剂的全面研究表明,多个调节层(转录、蛋白质稳定性和蛋白酶体靶向)会影响细胞周期中蛋白质表达动力学。