Suppr超能文献

北欧维持性治疗计划:整脊维持性治疗与症状引导治疗对复发性和持续性腰痛的疗效:一项实用的随机对照试验。

The Nordic Maintenance Care program: Effectiveness of chiropractic maintenance care versus symptom-guided treatment for recurrent and persistent low back pain-A pragmatic randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Karolinska Institutet, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Unit of Intervention and Implementation Research for Worker Health, Stockholm, Sweden.

Institute for Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2018 Sep 12;13(9):e0203029. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203029. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

For individuals with recurrent or persistent non-specific low back pain (LBP), exercise and exercise combined with education have been shown to be effective in preventing new episodes or in reducing the impact of the condition. Chiropractors have traditionally used Maintenance Care (MC), as secondary and tertiary prevention strategies. The aim of this trial was to investigate the effectiveness of MC on pain trajectories for patients with recurrent or persistent LBP.

METHOD

This pragmatic, investigator-blinded, two arm randomized controlled trial included consecutive patients (18-65 years old) with non-specific LBP, who had an early favorable response to chiropractic care. After an initial course of treatment, eligible subjects were randomized to either MC or control (symptom-guided treatment). The primary outcome was total number of days with bothersome LBP during 52 weeks collected weekly with text-messages (SMS) and estimated by a GEE model.

RESULTS

Three hundred and twenty-eight subjects were randomly allocated to one of the two treatment groups. MC resulted in a reduction in the total number of days per week with bothersome LBP compared with symptom-guided treatment. During the 12 month study period, the MC group (n = 163, 3 dropouts) reported 12.8 (95% CI = 10.1, 15.5; p = <0.001) fewer days in total with bothersome LBP compared to the control group (n = 158, 4 dropouts) and received 1.7 (95% CI = 1.8, 2.1; p = <0.001) more treatments. Numbers presented are means. No serious adverse events were recorded.

CONCLUSION

MC was more effective than symptom-guided treatment in reducing the total number of days over 52 weeks with bothersome non-specific LBP but it resulted in a higher number of treatments. For selected patients with recurrent or persistent non-specific LBP who respond well to an initial course of chiropractic care, MC should be considered an option for tertiary prevention.

摘要

背景

对于反复发作或持续存在的非特异性下腰痛(LBP)患者,运动和运动联合教育已被证明可有效预防新发作或减轻病情影响。整脊医生传统上使用维持治疗(MC)作为二级和三级预防策略。本试验旨在研究 MC 对复发性或持续性 LBP 患者疼痛轨迹的有效性。

方法

这是一项实用、研究者盲法、双臂随机对照试验,纳入了对整脊治疗有早期良好反应的非特异性 LBP 连续患者(18-65 岁)。在初始疗程后,符合条件的受试者被随机分配到 MC 组或对照组(症状指导治疗)。主要结局是通过短信(SMS)每周收集并通过广义估计方程模型估计的 52 周内有困扰的 LBP 的总天数。

结果

328 名受试者被随机分配到两组中的一组。与症状指导治疗相比,MC 组可减少每周有困扰的 LBP 天数。在 12 个月的研究期间,MC 组(n = 163,3 例脱落)报告的总困扰 LBP 天数比对照组(n = 158,4 例脱落)少 12.8 天(95%CI = 10.1,15.5;p <0.001),且接受的治疗次数多 1.7 次(95%CI = 1.8,2.1;p <0.001)。呈现的数字为平均值。未记录到严重不良事件。

结论

与症状指导治疗相比,MC 更有效地减少了 52 周内有困扰的非特异性 LBP 总天数,但导致了更多的治疗次数。对于对初始整脊治疗反应良好的复发性或持续性非特异性 LBP 患者,MC 应被视为三级预防的选择。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验