UKK Institute for Health Promotion Research, Kaupinpuistonkatu 1, 33500, Tampere, Finland.
Faculty of Social Sciences (Health Sciences), University of Tampere, Kalevantie 4, 33100, Tampere, Finland.
BMC Public Health. 2018 Dec 17;18(1):1376. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-6293-9.
Registered healthcare workers worldwide have a high prevalence of work-related musculoskeletal disorders, particularly of the back. Multidisciplinary interventions among these workers have improved fear avoidance beliefs, but not low back pain (LBP) and related sickness absences, cost-effectiveness studies are scarce. Our purpose was to investigate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of three intervention-arms (combined neuromuscular exercise and back care counselling or either alone) compared with non-treatment.
We randomly assigned female healthcare workers with recurrent non-specific LBP to one of four study-arms: Combined neuromuscular exercise and back care counseling; Exercise; Counseling; and no intervention Control. We assessed the effectiveness of the interventions on intensity of LBP, pain interfering with work and fear avoidance beliefs against the Control, and calculated the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios for sickness absence and QALY.
We conducted three sub-studies in consecutive years of 2011, 2012, and 2013 to reach an adequate sample size. All together 219 women were randomized within each sub-study, of whom 74 and 68% had adequate questionnaire data at 6 and 12 months, respectively. No adverse events occurred. Compliance rates varied between intervention-arms. After 12 months, the Combined-arm showed reduced intensity of LBP (p = 0.006; effect size 0.70, confidence interval 0.23 to 1.17) and pain interfering with work (p = 0.011) compared with the Control-arm. Work-related fear of pain was reduced in both the Combined- (p = 0.003) and Exercise-arm (p = 0.002). Physical activity-related fear was reduced only in the Exercise-arm (p = 0.008). During the study period (0-12 months) mean total costs were lowest in the Combined-arm (€476 vs. €1062-€1992, p < 0.001) as were the mean number of sickness absence days (0.15 vs. 2.29-4.17, p = 0.025). None of the intervention-arms was cost-effective for sickness absence. There was 85% probability of exercise-arm being cost-effective if willing to pay €3550 for QALY gained.
Exercise once a week for 6 months combined with five sessions of back care counseling after working hours in real-life settings effectively reduced the intensity of LBP, work interference due to LBP, and fear of pain, but was not cost-effective.
ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01465698 November 7, 2011 (prospective).
全球注册医护人员的工作相关肌肉骨骼疾病发病率较高,尤其是背部。对这些工作人员进行多学科干预可以改善对恐惧的回避信念,但不能改善腰痛(LBP)和相关缺勤,成本效益研究稀缺。我们的目的是研究三种干预手段(联合神经肌肉锻炼和背部保健咨询或单独使用)与非治疗相比的有效性和成本效益。
我们随机分配患有复发性非特异性 LBP 的女性医护人员到四个研究组之一:联合神经肌肉锻炼和背部保健咨询;锻炼;咨询;和无干预对照组。我们评估了干预措施对 LBP 强度、工作相关疼痛干扰和对恐惧的回避信念的有效性,与对照组相比,并计算了病假和 QALY 的增量成本效益比。
我们在 2011 年、2012 年和 2013 年连续三年进行了三项子研究,以达到足够的样本量。每个子研究中都有 219 名女性随机分组,其中分别有 74%和 68%在 6 个月和 12 个月时具有足够的问卷数据。没有不良事件发生。干预组之间的依从率不同。12 个月后,联合组的 LBP 强度(p=0.006;效应大小 0.70,置信区间 0.23 至 1.17)和工作相关疼痛干扰(p=0.011)低于对照组。联合组(p=0.003)和锻炼组(p=0.002)的工作相关疼痛恐惧均降低。仅在锻炼组中,与身体活动相关的恐惧减少(p=0.008)。在研究期间(0-12 个月),联合组的总成本最低(€476 比€1062-€1992,p<0.001),病假天数也最少(0.15 比 2.29-4.17,p=0.025)。干预组均不能有效降低病假的成本效益。如果愿意为获得的 QALY 支付€3550,则锻炼组有 85%的可能性具有成本效益。
每周锻炼一次,共 6 个月,并在工作时间后进行五次背部保健咨询,在现实环境中可有效降低 LBP 强度、因 LBP 导致的工作干扰和对疼痛的恐惧,但并不具有成本效益。
ClinicalTrials.gov,NCT01465698 年 11 月 7 日(前瞻性)。