Tahara Hirokazu, Sakamoto Masanori, Teranishi Toshiharu, Kanemitsu Yoshihiko
Institute for Chemical Research, Kyoto University, Uji, Kyoto, 611-0011, Japan.
Nat Commun. 2018 Sep 12;9(1):3782. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-06285-z.
The original version of this Article contained an error in the seventh sentence of the second paragraph of the 'TA amplitudes for double pump-pulse excitation" section of the Results, which incorrectly read 'The absorption cross-sections of the transitions from the single exciton state to the biexciton and triexciton states are denoted by σ' and σ'', respectively.' The correct version states 'σ''' in place of 'σ'''.The ninth and tenth sentences of the same paragraph originally incorrectly read 'The most important issue of this work is to clarify whether the multiple exciton absorption cross-sections σ' and σ'' are equal to σ or not. The black dotted curves in Fig. 3b, c show the predicted results of the TA amplitudes by assuming identical cross-sections, i.e., σ = σ ' = σ'' = .' The correct version states 'σ' and σ'' are equal" instead of 'σ' and σ'' are equal' and 'σ = σ' = σ''' in place of 'σ = σ ' = σ'' = '.This has been corrected in both the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.
本文的原始版本在结果部分“双泵浦脉冲激发的TA振幅”一节第二段的第七句中存在错误,原句错误地表述为“从单激子态到双激子态和三激子态的跃迁的吸收截面分别用σ'和σ''表示”。正确的表述应为用“σ'''”代替“σ''”。同一段的第九句和第十句原句错误地表述为“这项工作最重要的问题是弄清楚多激子吸收截面σ'和σ''是否等于σ。图3b、c中的黑色虚线曲线显示了假设截面相同,即σ = σ' = σ'' = 时TA振幅的预测结果”。正确的表述应为“σ'和σ''相等”而不是“σ'和σ''相等”,并用“σ = σ' = σ'''”代替“σ = σ' = σ'' = ”。本文的PDF和HTML版本均已对此进行了更正。