Di Pietro Verdiana, Colicchia Gianfranco M, Cervelli Valerio, Gentile Pietro
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Rome "La Sapienza", Rome, Italy.
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy.
J Cutan Aesthet Surg. 2018 Apr-Jun;11(2):73-78. doi: 10.4103/JCAS.JCAS_102_17.
Massive weight loss (MWL) brachioplasty is frequently requested for the improvement of the appearance and function of arms. Despite its diffusion, this procedure can be associated with significant complications. Liposuction-assisted brachioplasty (LAB) preserves the vascular, nervous, and lymphatic network and reduces the incidence of postoperative complications. This retrospective cohort study is aimed at analyzing two different modalities of arm contouring after MWL by evaluating the outcomes and complications. Of 31 patients (all females, average age 43.5 years), 20 were managed with standard brachioplasty represented by a swallowtail scar and monobloc resection and 11 with brachioplasty combined with aggressive liposuction. Evaluated parameters included age, body mass index, method of weight loss, and complications rate. No statistical analysis was used. Major postoperative complications (reoperation, bleeding, or thromboembolism) were not reported in both groups. The incidence of minor complications (wound separation, wound infection, and seroma) was globally 42%; the incidence of complications was significantly lower in the LAB group (9% vs. 60%). The incidence of hypertrophic scarring or keloid was higher in the control group (55% vs. 18%). Most patients were satisfied after surgery: in the LAB group, 81.8% of the patients expressed a high degree of satisfaction and 18.2% a good degree of satisfaction after 4 months of follow-up. In our experience, the LAB should be preferred in MWL patients because it has a lower rate of complications and a faster recovery than the standard technique. Proper execution requires considerable technical skill and experience.
巨量体重减轻(MWL)后的手臂整形术常用于改善手臂外观与功能。尽管该手术已广泛开展,但仍可能伴有严重并发症。抽脂辅助手臂整形术(LAB)可保留血管、神经和淋巴网络,降低术后并发症发生率。这项回顾性队列研究旨在通过评估结果和并发症,分析MWL后两种不同的手臂塑形方式。31例患者(均为女性,平均年龄43.5岁)中,20例行标准手臂整形术,采用燕尾状瘢痕和整块切除;11例行手臂整形术联合积极抽脂。评估参数包括年龄、体重指数、减重方法和并发症发生率。未进行统计分析。两组均未报告严重术后并发症(再次手术、出血或血栓栓塞)。轻微并发症(伤口裂开、伤口感染和血清肿)总发生率为42%;LAB组并发症发生率显著更低(9%对60%)。对照组增生性瘢痕或瘢痕疙瘩发生率更高(55%对18%)。大多数患者术后满意:LAB组中,81.8%的患者在随访4个月后表示高度满意,18.2%表示满意程度良好。根据我们的经验,MWL患者应首选LAB,因为其并发症发生率更低,恢复速度比标准技术更快。正确实施需要相当的技术技巧和经验。