de Runz Antoine, Colson Thomas, Minetti Christophe, Brix Muriel, Pujo Julien, Gisquet Heloïse, Simon Etienne
Nancy, France From the Department of Maxillofacial, Plastic, Reconstructive, and Cosmetic Surgery, Nancy University Hospital; the University of Lorraine; and the Clinique de la Ligne Bleue, Epinal.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015 Jan;135(1):74e-84e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000845.
Brachioplasty frequently offers functional benefits but results in poor aesthetic scars and a relatively high complication rate. The authors describe the complications and risk factors inherent in liposuction-assisted medial brachioplasty and assess patient satisfaction with the functional and aesthetic benefits.
A 5-year retrospective study was performed that included all patients who underwent liposuction-assisted medial brachioplasty. Complications were reviewed and analyzed by aesthetic and nonaesthetic categories, and patient satisfaction was rated.
Sixty-six patients were included (mean age, 44.4 years). The average body mass index was 30.2 kg/m; mean weight reduction was 50.72 kg. Thirty-seven patients (56.1 percent) developed at least one complication, including six (9.1 percent) with a nonaesthetic complication versus 31 (47.0 percent) with an aesthetic complication. Complications were significantly associated with a longer operative time (p = 0.015), 233 minutes in the complication group versus 164 minutes in the no-complication group. Fifty-three patients answered the questionnaire. Forty-six (86.8 percent) stated that they would undergo this intervention again. Overall satisfaction was reported as excellent for 12 patients (22.6 percent) and pleasing for 24 (45.3 percent). All patients rated the functional outcome superior or equal to the aesthetic outcome. Quality of life was estimated to be better after than before the intervention for 41 patients (77.4 percent).
Liposuction-assisted medial brachioplasty is a safe and efficient technique. It offers a functional benefit with a low nonaesthetic complication rate. Despite the inherent scars, the majority of patients would undergo this intervention again because of an important satisfaction rate and improvement in quality of life.
CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, III.
上臂成形术通常能带来功能上的益处,但会导致难看的瘢痕且并发症发生率相对较高。作者描述了吸脂辅助内侧上臂成形术固有的并发症和风险因素,并评估了患者对其功能和美学益处的满意度。
进行了一项为期5年的回顾性研究,纳入了所有接受吸脂辅助内侧上臂成形术的患者。对并发症按照美学和非美学类别进行回顾和分析,并对患者满意度进行评分。
共纳入66例患者(平均年龄44.4岁)。平均体重指数为30.2kg/m;平均体重减轻50.72kg。37例患者(56.1%)至少发生了一种并发症,其中6例(9.1%)发生非美学并发症,31例(47.0%)发生美学并发症。并发症与手术时间较长显著相关(p = 0.015),并发症组手术时间为233分钟,无并发症组为164分钟。53例患者回答了问卷。46例(86.8%)表示愿意再次接受该手术。总体满意度方面,12例患者(22.6%)报告为极佳,24例(45.3%)报告为满意。所有患者对功能结果的评分高于或等于美学结果。41例患者(77.4%)估计干预后的生活质量比干预前更好。
吸脂辅助内侧上臂成形术是一种安全有效的技术。它能带来功能益处且非美学并发症发生率较低。尽管存在固有的瘢痕,但由于较高的满意度和生活质量的改善,大多数患者愿意再次接受该手术。
临床问题/证据水平:风险,III级