Suppr超能文献

使用粪便免疫化学检测(FIT)的结直肠癌筛查项目:结肠镜检查的质量因医院类型而异。

Colorectal cancer screening program using FIT: quality of colonoscopy varies according to hospital type.

作者信息

Portillo Isabel, Idigoras Isabel, Bilbao Isabel, Arana-Arri Eunate, Fernández-Landa María José, Hurtado Jose Luis, Sarasaqueta Cristina, Bujanda Luis

机构信息

Colorectal Cancer Screening Programme Coordination Center, Bilbao, Spain.

BioCruces Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, Spain.

出版信息

Endosc Int Open. 2018 Sep;6(9):E1149-E1156. doi: 10.1055/a-0655-1987. Epub 2018 Sep 11.

Abstract

To compare the quality of colonoscopy in a population-based coordinated program of colorectal cancer screening according to type of hospital (academic or non-academic).  Consecutive patients undergoing colonoscopy after positive FIT (≥ 20 ug Hb/g feces) between January 2009 and September 2016 were prospectively included at five academic and seven non-academic public hospitals. Screening colonoscopy quality indicators considered were adenoma detection rate, cecal intubation rate, complications and bowel preparation quality. A total of 48,759 patients underwent colonoscopy, 34,616 (80 %) in academic hospitals and 14,143 in non-academic hospitals. Among these cases, 19,942 (37.1 %) advanced adenomas and 2,607 (5.3 %) colorectal cancers (CRCs) were detected, representing a total of 22,549 (46.2 %) cases of advanced neoplasia. The adenoma detection rate was 64 %, 63.1 % in academic hospitals and 66.4 % in non-academic hospitals (  < 0.001). Rates of advanced adenoma detection, cecal intubation and adequate colonic preparation were 45.8 %, 96.2 % and 88.3 %, respectively, and in all cases were lower (implying worse quality care) in academic hospitals (45.3 % vs 48.7 %; odds ratio [OR] 0.87, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.84 - 0.91; 95.9 % vs 97 %; OR 0.48, 95 % CI 0.38 - 0.69; and 86.4 % vs 93 %; OR 0.48, 95 % CI 0.45 - 0.5; respectively;  < 0.001 in all cases). In 13 patients, all in the academic hospital group, CRC was diagnosed after colonoscopy (0.26 cases × 1000 colonoscopies). Rates of CRC treated by endoscopy were similar in both types of hospital (30 %). The rate of severe complication was 1.2 % (602 patients), with no significant differences by hospital type: bleeding occurred in 1/147 colonoscopies and perforation in 1/329. One patient died within 30 days after screening colonoscopy. The quality of colonoscopy was better in non-academic hospitals. The rate of detection of advanced neoplasia was higher in non-academic hospitals and correlated with the rate of post-colonoscopy CRC.

摘要

比较在基于人群的结直肠癌筛查协调项目中,不同类型医院(学术型或非学术型)结肠镜检查的质量。2009年1月至2016年9月期间,连续5家学术型公立医院和7家非学术型公立医院对粪便免疫化学试验(FIT)阳性(≥20μg血红蛋白/克粪便)后接受结肠镜检查的患者进行前瞻性纳入。所考虑的筛查结肠镜检查质量指标包括腺瘤检出率、盲肠插管率、并发症和肠道准备质量。共有48759例患者接受了结肠镜检查,其中学术型医院34616例(80%),非学术型医院14143例。在这些病例中,检测到19942例(37.1%)高级别腺瘤和2607例(5.3%)结直肠癌(CRC),共计22549例(46.2%)高级别瘤变病例。腺瘤检出率为64%,学术型医院为63.1%,非学术型医院为66.4%(P<0.001)。高级别腺瘤检出率、盲肠插管率和充分结肠准备率分别为45.8%、96.2%和88.3%,在所有情况下,学术型医院的这些指标均较低(意味着医疗质量较差)(45.3%对48.7%;优势比[OR]0.87,95%置信区间[CI]0.84-0.91;95.9%对97%;OR 0.48,95%CI 0.38-0.69;86.4%对93%;OR 0.48,95%CI 0.45-0.5;所有情况下P<0.001)。13例患者(均在学术型医院组)在结肠镜检查后被诊断为CRC(0.26例/1000例结肠镜检查)。两种类型医院的内镜治疗CRC率相似(30%)。严重并发症发生率为1.2%(602例患者),不同医院类型之间无显著差异:每147例结肠镜检查中有1例发生出血,每329例中有1例发生穿孔。1例患者在筛查结肠镜检查后30天内死亡。非学术型医院的结肠镜检查质量更好。非学术型医院高级别瘤变的检出率更高,且与结肠镜检查后CRC的发生率相关。

相似文献

4

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验