Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.
Rehabil Psychol. 2018 Nov;63(4):588-594. doi: 10.1037/rep0000240. Epub 2018 Sep 13.
To compare recovery experienced during inpatient rehabilitation among individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI) based on whether their acute care included the Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment for Alcohol (CIWA) protocol.
Participants included 234 individuals with TBI who completed inpatient rehabilitation at a TBI Model Systems site. Of these, 67 patients were treated using the CIWA protocol (TBI + CIWA); 167 patients were treated for TBI alone (TBI only). Demographic, injury, and treatment variables between the 2 groups were compared. A repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) compared Disability Rating Scale (DRS) scores between the groups at admission and discharge from inpatient rehabilitation.
The 2 groups did not significantly differ on DRS scores at admission to inpatient rehabilitation: TBI + CIWA, = 9.6 (SD = 3.5) vs. TBI only, = 10.1 = 4.2). There was a significant difference in DRS scores at discharge, with the TBI + CIWA group having lower scores: TBI + CIWA, = 6.4 ( = 1.9) vs. TBI only, = 7.0 (SD = 2.2). A repeated-measures ANOVA of DRS scores from admission to discharge revealed a significant between-subjects effect based on patients' Mississippi categorization of posttraumatic amnesia (PTA) duration ( < .001) and age ( = .016) but not based on their CIWA status ( = .068). A post hoc comparison including age as a covariate revealed a significant difference based on CIWA status ( = .013) within the "moderate" injury group at discharge, with the TBI + CIWA group having lower discharge DRS scores.
Given the significant symptom overlap between alcohol withdrawal and PTA, it is likely that these 2 delirium presentations are confounded during the initial recovery from TBI, leading to "overestimation" of injury severity-particularly among individuals with moderate TBI. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).
比较创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者在住院康复期间的恢复情况,依据是他们的急性期治疗是否包括临床戒断评估酒精量表(CIWA)方案。
研究对象包括在 TBI 模型系统站点完成住院康复的 234 名 TBI 患者。其中,67 名患者接受 CIWA 方案治疗(TBI+CIWA);167 名患者接受单纯 TBI 治疗(TBI 仅)。比较两组患者的人口统计学、损伤和治疗变量。采用重复测量方差分析(ANOVA)比较两组患者入院和出院时残疾评定量表(DRS)评分。
两组患者入院时的 DRS 评分无显著差异:TBI+CIWA 组为 9.6(SD=3.5),TBI 仅组为 10.1(SD=4.2)。出院时 DRS 评分有显著差异,TBI+CIWA 组评分较低:TBI+CIWA 组为 6.4(SD=1.9),TBI 仅组为 7.0(SD=2.2)。入院至出院期间 DRS 评分的重复测量方差分析显示,患者创伤后遗忘症(PTA)持续时间的密西西比分类(<0.001)和年龄(=0.016)存在显著的受试者间效应,但 CIWA 状态(=0.068)无显著效应。包括年龄作为协变量的事后比较显示,在出院时的“中度”损伤组中,CIWA 状态存在显著差异(=0.013),TBI+CIWA 组的出院 DRS 评分较低。
鉴于酒精戒断和 PTA 之间存在显著的症状重叠,这两种谵妄表现可能在 TBI 初始恢复期间存在混淆,导致对损伤严重程度的“高估”,尤其是在中度 TBI 患者中。(美国心理协会,2018)