Kestle John R W, Lee Amy, Anderson Richard C E, Gociman Barbu, Patel Kamlesh B, Smyth Matthew D, Birgfeld Craig, Pollack Ian F, Goldstein Jesse A, Tamber Mandeep, Imahiyerobo Thomas, Siddiqi Faizi A
1Department of Neurosurgery, Division of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Primary Children's Hospital, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah; Departments of.
2Neurological Surgery and.
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2018 Dec 1;22(6):627-631. doi: 10.3171/2018.7.PEDS18132. Epub 2018 Sep 14.
OBJECTIVEThe authors created a collaborative network, the Synostosis Research Group (SynRG), to facilitate multicenter clinical research on craniosynostosis. To identify common and differing practice patterns within the network, they assessed the SynRG surgeons' management preferences for sagittal synostosis. These results will be incorporated into planning cooperative studies.METHODSThe SynRG consists of 12 surgeons at 5 clinical sites. An email survey was distributed to SynRG surgeons in late 2016, and responses were collected through early 2017. Responses were collated and analyzed descriptively.RESULTSAll of the surgeons-7 plastic/craniofacial surgeons and 5 neurosurgeons-completed the survey. They varied in both experience (1-24 years) and sagittal synostosis case volume in the preceding year (5-45 cases). Three sites routinely perform preoperative CT scans. The preferred surgical technique for children younger than 3 months is strip craniectomy (10/12 surgeons), whereas children older than 6 months are all treated with open cranial vault surgery. Pre-incision cefazolin, preoperative complete blood count panels, and an arterial line were used by most surgeons, but tranexamic acid was used routinely at 3 sites and never at the other 2 sites. Among surgeons performing endoscopic strip craniectomy surgery (SCS), most create a 5-cm-wide craniectomy, whereas 2 surgeons create a 2-cm strip. Four surgeons routinely send endoscopic SCS patients to the intensive care unit after surgery. Two of the 5 sites routinely obtain a CT scan within the 1st year after surgery.CONCLUSIONSThe SynRG surgeons vary substantially in the use of imaging, the choice of surgical procedure and technique, and follow-up. A collaborative network will provide the opportunity to study different practice patterns, reduce variation, and contribute multicenter data on the management of children with craniosynostosis.
目的
作者创建了一个协作网络,即颅缝早闭研究小组(SynRG),以促进颅缝早闭的多中心临床研究。为了确定该网络内常见和不同的实践模式,他们评估了SynRG外科医生对矢状缝早闭的治疗偏好。这些结果将纳入合作研究的规划中。
方法
SynRG由5个临床站点的12名外科医生组成。2016年末向SynRG外科医生发送了电子邮件调查问卷,并在2017年初收集了回复。对回复进行整理并进行描述性分析。
结果
所有外科医生——7名整形/颅面外科医生和5名神经外科医生——都完成了调查。他们的经验(1 - 24年)和上一年矢状缝早闭病例数量(5 - 45例)各不相同。3个站点常规进行术前CT扫描。3个月以下儿童首选的手术技术是颅骨条带切除术(12名外科医生中有10名),而6个月以上儿童均采用开放性颅穹窿手术治疗。大多数外科医生使用切口前头孢唑林、术前全血细胞计数检查和动脉置管,但氨甲环酸在3个站点常规使用,在另外2个站点从未使用。在进行内镜下颅骨条带切除术(SCS)的外科医生中,大多数创建5厘米宽的颅骨切除术,而2名外科医生创建2厘米宽的条带。4名外科医生常规在术后将内镜下SCS患者送入重症监护病房。5个站点中有2个常规在术后第1年内进行CT扫描。
结论
SynRG外科医生在影像学使用、手术程序和技术选择以及随访方面差异很大。一个协作网络将提供机会研究不同的实践模式,减少差异,并提供关于颅缝早闭患儿治疗的多中心数据。