Institute for Global Food Security, School of Biological Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Medical Biology Centre, Belfast, United Kingdom.
Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, School of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, Harborne Building, Whiteknights, Reading, United Kingdom.
J Med Entomol. 2019 Jan 8;56(1):276-279. doi: 10.1093/jme/tjy155.
Biological control can be an effective tool to combat public health risks associated with mosquito-borne disease. However, target impacts of biological control agents may be reduced by biotic contexts such as the presence of alternative prey. In turn, this can impede our ability to realistically assess biocontrol agent efficacy. Here, we examine the effects of alternative ciliate prey on the predation potential of two cyclopoid copepods, Macrocyclops albidus Jurine (Cyclopoida: Cyclopidae) and Megacyclops viridis Jurine (Cyclopoida: Cyclopidae), toward larvae of the West Nile virus vector mosquito Culex pipiens Linnaeus (Diptera: Culicidae). Using functional responses (FRs; resource use under different resource densities), we demonstrate that both copepods exhibit potentially destabilizing type II FRs toward mosquito prey. However, where the alternative prey was present, we observed species-specific modulations to FR form and magnitude. For M. albidus, FRs remained type II where ciliate prey were present, however, maximum feeding rates on mosquito larvae were reduced. Conversely, for M. viridis, FRs moved toward more stabilizing type III, while maximum feeding rates on mosquito larvae were not significantly reduced. While both species of cyclopoid copepod were able to effectively target and consume larval mosquitoes in the presence of alternative prey, we demonstrate that overall efficacies may be reduced in aquatic habitats which contain multiple prey types. We thus advocate that biotic contexts such as prey selectivity should be integrated into predatory biocontrol agent examinations for mosquitoes which vector pathogens and parasites, to more holistically assess their efficacy.
生物防治可以成为应对与蚊媒疾病相关的公共卫生风险的有效工具。然而,生物防治剂的目标影响可能会因替代猎物的存在等生物环境而降低。反过来,这可能会阻碍我们真实评估生物防治剂功效的能力。在这里,我们研究了替代纤毛虫猎物对两种环足类桡足类Macrocyclops albidus Jurine(Cyclopoida:Cyclopidae)和Megacyclops viridis Jurine(Cyclopoida:Cyclopidae)捕食幼虫的影响西尼罗河病毒载体蚊子库蚊Linnaeus(双翅目:Culicidae)。通过功能反应(FR;在不同资源密度下的资源利用),我们证明两种桡足类都表现出对蚊子猎物潜在的不稳定的 II 型 FR。然而,在存在替代猎物的情况下,我们观察到 FR 形式和幅度的种特异性调制。对于 M. albidus,当存在纤毛虫猎物时,FR 仍然是 II 型,但对蚊子幼虫的最大摄食率降低。相反,对于 M. viridis,FR 向更稳定的 III 型移动,而对蚊子幼虫的最大摄食率没有显著降低。尽管两种环足类桡足类都能够在存在替代猎物的情况下有效地靶向和消耗幼虫蚊子,但我们证明,在含有多种猎物类型的水生栖息地中,整体功效可能会降低。因此,我们主张应将生物环境(如猎物选择性)纳入携带病原体和寄生虫的蚊媒的捕食性生物防治剂的检查中,以更全面地评估它们的功效。