• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急诊科住院时间长主要是由急诊科以外的组织因素造成的:根本原因分析。

Long length of stay at the emergency department is mostly caused by organisational factors outside the influence of the emergency department: A root cause analysis.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

VU University school of medical sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2018 Sep 14;13(9):e0202751. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202751. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0202751
PMID:30216348
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6138369/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Emergency department (ED) crowding is common and associated with increased costs and negative patient outcomes. The aim of this study was to conduct an in-depth analysis to identify the root causes of an ED length of stay (ED-LOS) of more than six hours.

METHODS

An observational retrospective record review study was conducted to analyse the causes for ED-LOS of more than six hours during a one-week period in an academic hospital in the Netherlands. Basic administrative data were collected for all visiting patients. A root cause analysis was conducted using the PRISMA-method for patients with an ED-LOS > 6 hours, excluding children and critical care room presentations.

RESULTS

568 patients visited the ED during the selected week (January 2017). Eighty-four patients (15%) had an ED-LOS > 6 hours and a PRISMA-analysis was performed in 74 (88%) of these patients. 269 root causes were identified, 216 (76%) of which were organisational and 53 (22%) patient or disease related. 207 (94%) of the organisational factors were outside the influence of the ED. Descriptive statistics showed a mean number of 2,5 consultations, 59% hospital admissions or transfers and a mean age of 57 years in the ED-LOS > 6 hours group. For the total group, there was a mean number of 1,9 consultations, 29% hospital admissions or transfers and a mean age of 43 years.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that the root causes for an increased ED-LOS were mostly organisational and beyond the control of the ED. These results confirm that interventions addressing the complete acute care chain are needed in order to reduce ED-LOS and crowding in ED's.

摘要

背景

急诊科(ED)拥堵很常见,并且与增加的成本和负面的患者预后相关。本研究的目的是进行深入分析,以确定 ED 停留时间(ED-LOS)超过六小时的根本原因。

方法

在荷兰的一家学术医院,进行了为期一周的观察性回顾性记录回顾研究,以分析 ED-LOS 超过六小时的原因。为所有就诊患者收集了基本的行政数据。对于 ED-LOS>6 小时的患者,使用 PRISMA 方法进行根本原因分析,排除儿童和重症监护室患者。

结果

在选定的一周内,有 568 名患者到 ED 就诊(2017 年 1 月)。84 名患者(15%)的 ED-LOS>6 小时,对其中 74 名患者(88%)进行了 PRISMA 分析。确定了 269 个根本原因,其中 216 个(76%)与组织相关,53 个(22%)与患者或疾病相关。207 个(94%)组织因素不在 ED 的影响范围内。描述性统计显示,ED-LOS>6 小时组的平均就诊次数为 2.5 次,59%的患者住院或转院,平均年龄为 57 岁。对于总人群,平均就诊次数为 1.9 次,29%的患者住院或转院,平均年龄为 43 岁。

结论

本研究表明,导致 ED-LOS 增加的根本原因主要是组织方面的,超出了 ED 的控制范围。这些结果证实,需要干预整个急性护理链,以减少 ED 中的 ED-LOS 和拥堵。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2c43/6138369/d50e90852326/pone.0202751.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2c43/6138369/8dc388426715/pone.0202751.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2c43/6138369/d50e90852326/pone.0202751.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2c43/6138369/8dc388426715/pone.0202751.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2c43/6138369/d50e90852326/pone.0202751.g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Long length of stay at the emergency department is mostly caused by organisational factors outside the influence of the emergency department: A root cause analysis.急诊科住院时间长主要是由急诊科以外的组织因素造成的:根本原因分析。
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 14;13(9):e0202751. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202751. eCollection 2018.
2
Organisational Factors Induce Prolonged Emergency Department Length of Stay in Elderly Patients--A Retrospective Cohort Study.组织因素导致老年患者急诊科住院时间延长——一项回顾性队列研究。
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 12;10(8):e0135066. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135066. eCollection 2015.
3
Comparison of methods for measuring crowding and its effects on length of stay in the emergency department.比较测量拥挤程度及其对急诊科住院时间影响的方法。
Acad Emerg Med. 2011 Dec;18(12):1269-77. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01232.x.
4
Emergency Department Length of Stay for Critical Care Admissions. A Population-based Study.重症监护病房收治患者的急诊科住院时间。一项基于人群的研究。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016 Aug;13(8):1324-32. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201511-773OC.
5
Using Lean Management to Reduce Emergency Department Length of Stay for Medicine Admissions.运用精益管理缩短内科住院患者在急诊科的停留时间。
Qual Manag Health Care. 2017 Apr/Jun;26(2):91-96. doi: 10.1097/QMH.0000000000000132.
6
Impact of a well-developed primary care system on the length of stay in emergency departments in the Netherlands: a multicenter study.完善的初级医疗保健系统对荷兰急诊科住院时间的影响:一项多中心研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Apr 26;16:149. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1400-z.
7
The association between length of emergency department boarding and mortality.急诊科滞留时间与死亡率之间的关联。
Acad Emerg Med. 2011 Dec;18(12):1324-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01236.x.
8
Emergency department patient flow: the influence of hospital census variables on emergency department length of stay.急诊科患者流量:医院普查变量对急诊科住院时间的影响。
Acad Emerg Med. 2009 Jul;16(7):597-602. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00397.x.
9
Effect of an independent-capacity protocol on overcrowding in an urban emergency department.独立容量协议对城市急诊科拥挤状况的影响。
Acad Emerg Med. 2009 Dec;16(12):1277-1283. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00526.x. Epub 2009 Nov 12.
10
Predicting Length of Stay among Patients Discharged from the Emergency Department-Using an Accelerated Failure Time Model.使用加速失效时间模型预测急诊科出院患者的住院时间
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 20;12(1):e0165756. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165756. eCollection 2017.

引用本文的文献

1
Degree of Compliance of Hospital Emergency Departments With the Recommended Standards and Their Evolution During the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic.医院急诊科对推荐标准的遵守程度及其在新冠疫情期间的演变
J Nurs Manag. 2025 Jun 25;2025:4228788. doi: 10.1155/jonm/4228788. eCollection 2025.
2
Comparing Performance Outcomes of Emergency Medicine-Trained vs. Non-Emergency Medicine-Trained Physicians in Emergency Departments.比较急诊科中接受过急诊医学培训与未接受过急诊医学培训的医生的绩效结果。
J Acute Med. 2025 Jun 1;15(2):58-65. doi: 10.6705/j.jacme.202506_15(2).0003.
3
Streamlining emergency nursing care post-pandemic: A lean approach for reducing wait times and improving patient and staff satisfaction in the hospital.

本文引用的文献

1
Results on patient flow of implementing an Acute Medical Unit.
Acute Med. 2018;17(2):62-67.
2
Relationship of the clinical acuity & complexity to the outcome of an emergency medical admission.急诊入院的临床严重程度及复杂性与结局的关系。
Acute Med. 2018;17(1):18-25.
3
Acute Medical Ward for better care coordination of patients admitted with infection - evidence from a tertiary hospital in Singapore.急性内科病房用于改善感染入院患者的护理协调——来自新加坡一家三级医院的证据。
Acute Med. 2017;16(4):170-176.
疫情后优化急诊护理:一种采用精益方法减少等待时间并提高医院患者及医护人员满意度的策略
BMC Nurs. 2025 Apr 22;24(1):445. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-02759-w.
4
Analysis of factors influencing length of stay in the emergency department in public hospital, Padang, Indonesia.印度尼西亚巴东公立医院急诊科住院时间影响因素分析。
Med J Armed Forces India. 2025 Jan-Feb;81(1):52-57. doi: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2023.11.009. Epub 2024 Jan 13.
5
Optimizing Emergency Department Length of Stay and Quality of Care: A Quality Improvement Project.优化急诊科住院时间和护理质量:一项质量改进项目。
Cureus. 2024 Oct 21;16(10):e71989. doi: 10.7759/cureus.71989. eCollection 2024 Oct.
6
Factors that predict emergency department length of stay in analysis of national data.在国家数据分析中预测急诊科住院时间的因素。
Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2025 Mar;12(1):35-46. doi: 10.15441/ceem.24.309. Epub 2024 Oct 16.
7
The cost effectiveness of early assessment and intervention by a dedicated health and social care professional team for older adults in the emergency department compared to treatment-as-usual: Economic evaluation of the OPTI-MEND trial.由专门的医疗和社会保健专业团队对急诊科的老年人进行早期评估和干预相对于常规治疗的成本效益:OPTI-MEND 试验的经济评估。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 25;19(6):e0298162. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298162. eCollection 2024.
8
From symptom onset to ED departure: understanding the acute care chain for patients with undifferentiated complaints: a prospective observational study.从症状出现到离开急诊科:了解未分化主诉患者的急性护理流程:一项前瞻性观察性研究。
Int J Emerg Med. 2024 Apr 15;17(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12245-024-00629-x.
9
Emergency department crowding: An examination of older adults and vulnerability.急诊科拥挤:对老年人及脆弱性的研究。
Nurs Ethics. 2025 Feb;32(1):99-110. doi: 10.1177/09697330241238333. Epub 2024 Mar 13.
10
Improving the emergency services using quality improvement project and Donabedian model in a quaternary teaching hospital in South India.在印度南部的一所四级教学医院,利用质量改进项目和 Donabedian 模型来改进急诊服务。
BMJ Open Qual. 2024 Feb 23;13(1):e002246. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2022-002246.
4
The impact of medical specialist staffing on emergency department patient flow and satisfaction.医疗专家人员配备对急诊科患者流量和满意度的影响。
Eur J Emerg Med. 2019 Feb;26(1):47-52. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000487.
5
Effects of a hospital-wide intervention on emergency department crowding and quality: A prospective study.全院干预对急诊科拥挤状况及质量的影响:一项前瞻性研究。
Emerg Med Australas. 2017 Aug;29(4):415-420. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.12771. Epub 2017 Apr 5.
6
Applicability of the modified Emergency Department Work Index (mEDWIN) at a Dutch emergency department.改良版急诊科工作指数(mEDWIN)在荷兰一家急诊科的适用性。
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 10;12(3):e0173387. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173387. eCollection 2017.
7
Emergency oncology: development, current position and future direction in the USA and UK.急诊肿瘤学:美国和英国的发展、现状及未来方向
Support Care Cancer. 2017 Jan;25(1):3-7. doi: 10.1007/s00520-016-3470-1. Epub 2016 Nov 4.
8
Exploring the preventable causes of unplanned readmissions using root cause analysis: Coordination of care is the weakest link.运用根本原因分析法探究可预防的非计划性再入院原因:协调护理是最薄弱的一环。
Eur J Intern Med. 2016 May;30:18-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2015.12.021. Epub 2016 Jan 13.
9
ED crowding is associated with inpatient mortality among critically ill patients admitted via the ED: post hoc analysis from a retrospective study.急诊科拥挤与经急诊科收治的危重症患者的住院死亡率相关:一项回顾性研究的事后分析。
Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Dec;33(12):1725-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2015.08.004. Epub 2015 Aug 7.
10
What are we waiting for? Factors influencing completion times in an academic and peripheral emergency department.我们在等什么?影响学术型和周边急诊科完成时间的因素。
Neth J Med. 2015 Aug;73(7):331-40.