• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

改良保留神经根治性子宫切除术的外科及肿瘤学疗效:两个中心的6年经验

Surgical and oncological outcomes of an improved nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy technique: 6 years of experience at two centres.

作者信息

Yin Sheng, Ma Si-Ning, Zhang Yu-Qin, Shi Ting-Yan, Xiang Li-Bing, Ren Yu-Lan, Zang Rong-Yu

机构信息

Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, China.

Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Fudan University Cancer Hospital, China.

出版信息

Surg Oncol. 2018 Sep;27(3):380-386. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2018.05.015. Epub 2018 May 25.

DOI:10.1016/j.suronc.2018.05.015
PMID:30217291
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

An improved nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy (NSRH), which is based on the paravesico-vaginal space, has been recently introduced in a phase II, prospective clinical trial by our team. This study aims to report the surgical and oncological outcomes of this improved NSRH.

METHODS

One hundred seventy-seven consecutive patients were enrolled in our study and underwent the improved NSRH. The proportion of successful catheter removal and postvoid residual urine volume (PVR) of 50 mL or less at postoperative day 7 or day 4 was used to assess surgical outcomes. The local control rate (LCR), disease free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) were used to assess oncological outcomes.

RESULTS

Postoperative 30-day complications occurred in 27/177 (15.3%) patients. The rate of successful catheter removal and PVR of 50 mL or less were 85.2% (23/27) and 66.7% (18/27) at postoperative day 7, and 73.3% (110/150) and 35.3% (53/150) at postoperative day 4. A total of 13 (7.9%) patients showed recurrence after a median follow-up time of 39.2 months (range 3.2-68.1 months). The estimated 2-year and 5-year DFS rates were 92.2% and 91.1%, respectively. Seven (4.2%) patients presented local recurrence, and five (3.0%) patients were dead at the end of the follow-up period. The estimated 5-year LCR and OS were 95.1% and 96.2%, respectively. In univariate analysis, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage, lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI), and lymph node metastasis were found to be the prognostic risk factors of DFS. Patients with LVSI were associated with a worse DFS according to the multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

The improved NSRH in our study may provide better surgical outcomes without compromising the survival in patients with early cervical cancer.

摘要

目的

基于膀胱阴道旁间隙的改良保留神经根治性子宫切除术(NSRH),最近已由我们团队引入一项II期前瞻性临床试验。本研究旨在报告这种改良NSRH的手术和肿瘤学结果。

方法

177例连续患者纳入本研究并接受改良NSRH。术后第7天或第4天成功拔除导尿管的比例以及残余尿量(PVR)≤50 mL用于评估手术结果。局部控制率(LCR)、无病生存期(DFS)和总生存期(OS)用于评估肿瘤学结果。

结果

27/177(15.3%)例患者发生术后30天并发症。术后第7天成功拔除导尿管的比例和PVR≤50 mL分别为85.2%(23/27)和66.7%(18/27),术后第4天分别为73.3%(110/150)和35.3%(53/150)。中位随访时间39.2个月(范围3.2 - 68.1个月)后,共有13例(7.9%)患者出现复发。估计2年和5年DFS率分别为92.2%和91.1%。7例(4.2%)患者出现局部复发,5例(3.0%)患者在随访期末死亡。估计5年LCR和OS分别为95.1%和96.2%。单因素分析中,国际妇产科联盟(FIGO)分期、淋巴管间隙浸润(LVSI)和淋巴结转移被发现是DFS的预后风险因素。多因素分析显示,LVSI患者的DFS较差。

结论

我们研究中的改良NSRH可能为早期宫颈癌患者提供更好的手术结果,且不影响生存率。

相似文献

1
Surgical and oncological outcomes of an improved nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy technique: 6 years of experience at two centres.改良保留神经根治性子宫切除术的外科及肿瘤学疗效:两个中心的6年经验
Surg Oncol. 2018 Sep;27(3):380-386. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2018.05.015. Epub 2018 May 25.
2
Efficacy and oncologic safety of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a randomized controlled trial.保留神经的宫颈癌根治术的疗效及肿瘤学安全性:一项随机对照试验
J Gynecol Oncol. 2015 Apr;26(2):90-9. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2015.26.2.90.
3
Surgical, Urinary, and Survival Outcomes of Nerve-sparing Versus Traditional Radical Hysterectomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study in China.在中国开展的一项回顾性队列研究中,比较了保留神经与传统根治性子宫切除术的手术、尿控和生存结局。
Am J Clin Oncol. 2019 Oct;42(10):783-788. doi: 10.1097/COC.0000000000000593.
4
The Urodynamics and Survival Outcomes of Different Methods of Dissecting the Inferior Hypogastric Plexus in Laparoscopic Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy of Type C: A Randomized Controlled Study.不同方法解剖腹腔镜下 C 型神经保留根治性子宫切除术时下腹下丛对尿动力学和生存结局的影响:一项随机对照研究。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 May;26(5):1560-1568. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07228-8. Epub 2019 Feb 13.
5
[Feasibility of unilateral or bilateral nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in patients with cervical cancer and evaluation of the post-surgery recovery of the bladder and rectal function].[宫颈癌患者行单侧或双侧保留神经根治性子宫切除术的可行性及术后膀胱和直肠功能恢复情况评估]
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2011 Jan;33(1):53-7.
6
Class III nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy versus standard class III radical hysterectomy: an observational study.III 类神经保留根治性子宫切除术与标准 III 类根治性子宫切除术的比较:一项观察性研究。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 Nov;18(12):3469-78. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-1767-3. Epub 2011 May 10.
7
Favorable factors for preserving bladder function after nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: A protocol-based validation study.保留神经的根治性子宫切除术后膀胱功能保留的有利因素:一项基于方案的验证研究。
J Surg Oncol. 2017 Sep;116(4):492-499. doi: 10.1002/jso.24696. Epub 2017 Jul 10.
8
[Evaluation of postoperative bladder function and prognosis after modified nerve sparing radical hysterectomy].改良保留神经广泛性子宫切除术后膀胱功能及预后评估
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2014 May;49(5):341-7.
9
[A prospective study on nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in patients with cervical cancer].[宫颈癌患者保留神经的根治性子宫切除术的前瞻性研究]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2008 Aug;43(8):606-10.
10
Effectiveness and Long-term Outcomes of Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer.保留神经的宫颈癌根治术的有效性及长期预后
J Nippon Med Sch. 2021 Nov 17;88(5):386-397. doi: 10.1272/jnms.JNMS.2021_88-503. Epub 2020 Aug 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Urological Complications in Radical Surgery for Cervical Cancer: A Comparative Meta-Analysis before and after LACC Trial.宫颈癌根治性手术中的泌尿系统并发症:LACC试验前后的比较Meta分析
J Clin Med. 2023 Aug 31;12(17):5677. doi: 10.3390/jcm12175677.