• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

保留神经的宫颈癌根治术的有效性及长期预后

Effectiveness and Long-term Outcomes of Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer.

作者信息

Yamamoto Akihito, Kamoi Seiryu, Ikeda Mariko, Yamada Takashi, Yoneyama Koichi, Takeshita Toshiyuki

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nippon Medical School.

出版信息

J Nippon Med Sch. 2021 Nov 17;88(5):386-397. doi: 10.1272/jnms.JNMS.2021_88-503. Epub 2020 Aug 1.

DOI:10.1272/jnms.JNMS.2021_88-503
PMID:32741908
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Radical hysterectomy (RH) is a type of radical surgery for cervical cancer. Urinary dysfunction due to RH worsens postoperative quality of life of patients with cervical cancer. Nerve-sparing RH (NSRH) technique has been used as an effective means to conserve urinary function. However, few reports have examine long-term outcomes after NSRH. This study describes the details and long-term outcomes of our nerve-sparing technique.

METHODS

Sixty-one patients underwent radical hysterectomy in a 5-year period during which nerve-sparing technique was introduced; of these, 31 patients underwent NSRH and 30 underwent conventional RH. We retrospectively examined their medical records and compared postoperative urinary function and treatment outcomes between these two groups.

RESULTS

The median time required for urinary residual volume to fall to ≤50 mL after removal of the urinary catheter was 6 days (range, 2-20 days) in the NSRH group and 13.5 days (range, 3-46 days) in the RH group. The results were significantly better in the NSRH group (p < 0.05). The mean follow-up period was 2456.3 days (range, 48-4,213 days). Analysis of curability revealed no significant difference between the two groups in local recurrence or long-term survival rates. The 5-year survival rate was 0.861 in the NSRH group and 0.782 in the RH group; the 10-year survival rate was 0.861 in the NSRH group and 0.679 in the RH group.

CONCLUSIONS

NSRH significantly improved postoperative urinary function without worsening local recurrence rates or long-term outcomes.

摘要

背景

根治性子宫切除术(RH)是宫颈癌的一种根治性手术。RH导致的排尿功能障碍会恶化宫颈癌患者的术后生活质量。保留神经的RH(NSRH)技术已被用作保留排尿功能的有效手段。然而,很少有报告研究NSRH后的长期结果。本研究描述了我们的保留神经技术的细节和长期结果。

方法

在引入保留神经技术的5年期间,61例患者接受了根治性子宫切除术;其中,31例患者接受了NSRH,30例接受了传统RH。我们回顾性检查了他们的病历,并比较了两组患者术后的排尿功能和治疗结果。

结果

NSRH组拔除导尿管后残余尿量降至≤50 mL所需的中位时间为6天(范围2 - 20天),RH组为13.5天(范围3 - 46天)。NSRH组的结果明显更好(p < 0.05)。平均随访期为2456.3天(范围48 - 4213天)。治愈率分析显示,两组在局部复发率或长期生存率方面无显著差异。NSRH组的5年生存率为0.861,RH组为0.782;NSRH组的10年生存率为0.861,RH组为0.679。

结论

NSRH显著改善了术后排尿功能,且未使局部复发率或长期结果恶化。

相似文献

1
Effectiveness and Long-term Outcomes of Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer.保留神经的宫颈癌根治术的有效性及长期预后
J Nippon Med Sch. 2021 Nov 17;88(5):386-397. doi: 10.1272/jnms.JNMS.2021_88-503. Epub 2020 Aug 1.
2
[Feasibility of unilateral or bilateral nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in patients with cervical cancer and evaluation of the post-surgery recovery of the bladder and rectal function].[宫颈癌患者行单侧或双侧保留神经根治性子宫切除术的可行性及术后膀胱和直肠功能恢复情况评估]
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2011 Jan;33(1):53-7.
3
Class III nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy versus standard class III radical hysterectomy: an observational study.III 类神经保留根治性子宫切除术与标准 III 类根治性子宫切除术的比较:一项观察性研究。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 Nov;18(12):3469-78. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-1767-3. Epub 2011 May 10.
4
Efficacy and oncologic safety of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a randomized controlled trial.保留神经的宫颈癌根治术的疗效及肿瘤学安全性:一项随机对照试验
J Gynecol Oncol. 2015 Apr;26(2):90-9. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2015.26.2.90.
5
Surgical, Urinary, and Survival Outcomes of Nerve-sparing Versus Traditional Radical Hysterectomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study in China.在中国开展的一项回顾性队列研究中,比较了保留神经与传统根治性子宫切除术的手术、尿控和生存结局。
Am J Clin Oncol. 2019 Oct;42(10):783-788. doi: 10.1097/COC.0000000000000593.
6
[Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy and radical hysterectomy: a retrospective study].保留神经的根治性子宫切除术与根治性子宫切除术:一项回顾性研究
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2009 Aug;44(8):605-9.
7
[A prospective study on nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in patients with cervical cancer].[宫颈癌患者保留神经的根治性子宫切除术的前瞻性研究]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2008 Aug;43(8):606-10.
8
Oncologic effectiveness of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer.保留神经的广泛性子宫切除术治疗宫颈癌的肿瘤学效果。
J Gynecol Oncol. 2018 May;29(3):e41. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2018.29.e41. Epub 2018 Feb 28.
9
Pelvic dysfunctions and quality of life after nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: a multicenter comparative study.保留神经的广泛子宫切除术对盆脏功能及生活质量的影响:多中心对照研究
Anticancer Res. 2012 Feb;32(2):581-8.
10
Clinical efficacy and safety of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.保留神经的宫颈癌根治术的临床疗效与安全性:一项系统评价和Meta分析
PLoS One. 2014 Apr 18;9(4):e94116. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094116. eCollection 2014.

引用本文的文献

1
A newly modified nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy technique with analysis of short-term oncologic, surgical, and functional outcomes.一种新改良的保留神经根治性子宫切除术技术及短期肿瘤学、手术和功能结局分析。
Front Oncol. 2025 Jun 4;15:1555483. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1555483. eCollection 2025.
2
Perineural Invasion in Cervical Cancer: A Hidden Trail for Metastasis.宫颈癌中的神经周围浸润:转移的隐匿途径
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Jul 14;14(14):1517. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14141517.
3
Challenges in the Diagnosis and Individualized Treatment of Cervical Cancer.
宫颈癌的诊断和个体化治疗挑战。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 May 11;59(5):925. doi: 10.3390/medicina59050925.
4
Impact of timing of urinary catheter removal on voiding dysfunction after radical hysterectomy for early cervical cancer.早期宫颈癌根治术后导尿管拔除时间对排尿功能障碍的影响。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2022 Aug 1;32(8):986-992. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2022-003654.