• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经口内镜下肌切开术中术中黏膜损伤的临床和内镜预测因素。

Clinical and endoscopic predictors for intraprocedural mucosal injury during per-oral endoscopic myotomy.

机构信息

Endoscopy Center and Endoscopy Research Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Apr;89(4):769-778. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.09.003. Epub 2018 Sep 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.gie.2018.09.003
PMID:30218646
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Mucosal injury (MI) is one of the most common perioperative adverse events of per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM). Severe undertreated MI may lead to contamination of the tunnel and even mediastinitis. This study explored the characteristics, predictors, and management approaches of intraoperative MI.

METHODS

A retrospective review of the prospectively collected database at a large tertiary referral endoscopy unit was conducted for all patients undergoing POEM between August 2010 and March 2016. MI was graded according to the difficulty of repair (I, easy to repair; II, difficult to repair). The primary outcomes were the incidence and predictors of intraoperative MI. Secondary outcomes were MI details and the corresponding treatment.

RESULTS

POEM was successfully performed in 1912 patients. A total of 338 patients experienced 387 MIs, for an overall frequency of 17.7% (338/1912). Type II MI was rare, with a frequency of 1.7% (39/1912). Major adverse events were more common in patients with MI than in those without MI (6.2% vs 2.5%, P < .001). On multivariable analysis, MI was independently associated with previous Heller myotomy (odds ratio [OR], 2.094; P = .026), previous POEM (OR, 2.441; P = .033), submucosal fibrosis (OR, 4.530; P < .001), mucosal edema (OR, 1.834; P = .001), and tunnel length ≥13 cm (OR, 2.699; P < .001). Previous POEM (OR, 5.005; P = .030) and submucosal fibrosis (OR, 12.074; P < .001) were significant predictors of type II MI. POEM experience >1 year was a protective factor for MI (OR, .614; P = .042) and type II MI (OR, .297; P = .042).

CONCLUSIONS

MI during POEM is common, but type II injury is rare. Previous POEM and submucosal fibrosis were significant predictors of type II mucosal injury. POEM experience after the learning curve reduces the risk of MI.

摘要

背景和目的

黏膜损伤(MI)是经口内镜肌切开术(POEM)围手术期最常见的不良事件之一。严重治疗不足的 MI 可能导致隧道污染,甚至纵隔炎。本研究探讨了术中 MI 的特征、预测因素和处理方法。

方法

对 2010 年 8 月至 2016 年 3 月在一家大型三级转诊内镜中心行 POEM 的所有患者的前瞻性数据库进行回顾性分析。根据修复难度对 MI 进行分级(I 级,容易修复;II 级,难以修复)。主要结局是术中 MI 的发生率和预测因素。次要结局是 MI 的详细情况和相应的治疗方法。

结果

POEM 成功完成于 1912 例患者。共有 338 例患者发生 387 例 MI,总体发生率为 17.7%(338/1912)。II 型 MI 罕见,发生率为 1.7%(39/1912)。MI 患者的主要不良事件发生率高于无 MI 患者(6.2% vs 2.5%,P<.001)。多变量分析显示,MI 与既往 Heller 肌切开术(比值比 [OR],2.094;P=.026)、既往 POEM(OR,2.441;P=.033)、黏膜下纤维化(OR,4.530;P<.001)、黏膜水肿(OR,1.834;P=.001)和隧道长度≥13 cm(OR,2.699;P<.001)有关。既往 POEM(OR,5.005;P=.030)和黏膜下纤维化(OR,12.074;P<.001)是 II 型 MI 的显著预测因素。POEM 经验>1 年是 MI(OR,.614;P=.042)和 II 型 MI(OR,.297;P=.042)的保护因素。

结论

POEM 术中 MI 很常见,但 II 型损伤很少见。既往 POEM 和黏膜下纤维化是 II 型黏膜损伤的显著预测因素。学习曲线后的 POEM 经验可降低 MI 的风险。

相似文献

1
Clinical and endoscopic predictors for intraprocedural mucosal injury during per-oral endoscopic myotomy.经口内镜下肌切开术中术中黏膜损伤的临床和内镜预测因素。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Apr;89(4):769-778. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.09.003. Epub 2018 Sep 13.
2
Adverse events during and after per-oral endoscopic myotomy: prevention, diagnosis, and management.经口内镜下肌切开术期间和之后的不良事件:预防、诊断和处理。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Jan;87(1):4-17. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.09.029. Epub 2017 Oct 4.
3
Early adverse events of per-oral endoscopic myotomy.经口内镜下肌切开术的早期不良事件。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Apr;85(4):708-718.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.08.033. Epub 2016 Sep 5.
4
Submucosal fibrosis in achalasia patients is a rare cause of aborted peroral endoscopic myotomy procedures.贲门失弛缓症患者的黏膜下纤维化是经口内镜肌切开术失败的罕见原因。
Endoscopy. 2017 Aug;49(8):736-744. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-113440. Epub 2017 Jun 28.
5
Per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM): a new endoscopic treatment for achalasia.经口内镜下肌切开术(POEM):一种治疗贲门失弛缓症的新内镜治疗方法。
Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2017 Oct;109(10):719-726. doi: 10.17235/reed.2017.4732/2016.
6
Factors predicting the technical difficulty of peroral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia.预测贲门失弛缓症经口内镜下肌切开术技术难度的因素。
Surg Endosc. 2016 Sep;30(9):3774-82. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4673-0. Epub 2015 Dec 10.
7
Surgical management of esophageal achalasia: Evolution of an institutional approach to minimally invasive repair.食管贲门失弛缓症的外科治疗:一种微创修复的机构性方法的演变
J Pediatr Surg. 2016 Oct;51(10):1619-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.05.015. Epub 2016 May 31.
8
Peroral endoscopic myotomy for the treatment of esophageal achalasia: systematic review and pooled analysis.经口内镜下肌切开术治疗食管贲门失弛缓症:系统评价与汇总分析
Dis Esophagus. 2016 Oct;29(7):807-819. doi: 10.1111/dote.12387. Epub 2015 Jul 14.
9
Treatment of Achalasia with Per-Oral Endoscopic Myotomy: Analysis of 50 Consecutive Patients.经口内镜下肌切开术治疗贲门失弛缓症:50例连续患者的分析
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018 May;28(5):514-525. doi: 10.1089/lap.2017.0588. Epub 2018 Apr 2.
10
Analysis of a learning curve and predictors of intraoperative difficulty for peroral esophageal myotomy (POEM).经口内镜下食管肌切开术(POEM)的学习曲线分析及术中困难预测因素分析。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2014 Jan;18(1):92-8; discussion 98-9. doi: 10.1007/s11605-013-2332-0. Epub 2013 Sep 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Successful treatment of a full-thickness mucosal injury with a fully covered metal stent during peroral endoscopic myotomy.经口内镜下肌切开术期间使用完全覆盖的金属支架成功治疗全层黏膜损伤。
Endoscopy. 2025 Dec;57(S 01):E635-E636. doi: 10.1055/a-2615-6134. Epub 2025 Jun 26.
2
Evolving therapeutic approaches in achalasia: a comprehensive review of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) vs. Heller's myotomy.贲门失弛缓症不断发展的治疗方法:经口内镜下肌切开术(POEM)与海勒肌切开术的全面综述
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2025 Apr 10;87(5):2855-2867. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000003271. eCollection 2025 May.
3
Transverse versus longitudinal mucosal incision during POEM for esophageal motility disorders: a randomized trial.
经口内镜下肌切开术(POEM)治疗食管动力障碍时,横向与纵向黏膜切口:一项随机试验。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Sep;38(9):5053-5059. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11027-y. Epub 2024 Jul 15.
4
Peroral endoscopic myotomy is an effective treatment for achalasia combined with hiatal hernia.经口内镜下肌切开术是治疗贲门失弛缓症合并食管裂孔疝的有效方法。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Aug;38(8):4543-4549. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10948-y. Epub 2024 Jun 27.
5
Pull-back myotomy to prevent mucosal injury during peroral endoscopic myotomy for jackhammer esophagus.在经口内镜下对风钻样食管进行肌切开术时采用回拉式肌切开术以防止黏膜损伤。
Endoscopy. 2024 Dec;56(S 01):E362-E363. doi: 10.1055/a-2301-8035. Epub 2024 Apr 24.
6
Management of multiple esophageal leaks with an ultra-large fully covered metallic stent after aborted peroral endoscopic myotomy.经口内镜下肌切开术失败后使用超大全覆膜金属支架治疗多处食管漏
Endoscopy. 2023 Dec;55(S 01):E478-E479. doi: 10.1055/a-2018-4213. Epub 2023 Mar 1.
7
Publication trends of peroral endoscopic myotomy during 2010-2022: a bibliometric analysis.2010 - 2022年经口内镜下肌切开术的发表趋势:一项文献计量分析
Ann Transl Med. 2022 Dec;10(23):1272. doi: 10.21037/atm-22-2469.
8
A prediction model and nomogram for technical difficulty of peroral endoscopic myotomy.经口内镜下肌切开术技术难度的预测模型与列线图
Surg Endosc. 2023 Apr;37(4):2781-2788. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09798-3. Epub 2022 Dec 7.
9
Training in esophageal peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) on an ex vivo porcine model: learning curve study and training strategy.经体外猪模型进行食管经口内镜肌切开术(POEM)培训:学习曲线研究和培训策略。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Mar;37(3):2062-2069. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09736-3. Epub 2022 Oct 26.
10
Mucosal Injury During Per-oral Endoscopic Myotomy: A Single-Center Experience.经口内镜肌切开术中的黏膜损伤:单中心经验。
Turk J Gastroenterol. 2022 Nov;33(11):985-994. doi: 10.5152/tjg.2022.21949.