Cilla Savino, Deodato Francesco, Ianiro Anna, Macchia Gabriella, Picardi Vincenzo, Buwenge Milly, Cammelli Silvia, Zamagni Alice, Valentini Vincenzo, Morganti Alessio G
Medical Physics Unit, Fondazione di Ricerca e Cura Giovanni Paolo II - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy.
Radiation Oncology Unit, Fondazione di Ricerca e Cura Giovanni Paolo II - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy.
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2018 Nov;19(6):35-43. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12427. Epub 2018 Sep 15.
This study aimed to assess the feasibility to plan and deliver highly heterogeneous doses to symptomatic large tumors using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) during a short course palliative accelerated radiotherapy.
A patient with a large symptomatic chordoma infiltrating the right gluteal region was selected. A modified SIB treatment was implemented to irradiate the central volume of the tumor (boost target volume, BTV) up to 10 Gy/fraction in a dose escalation trial while maintaining the remaining tumor volume (planning target volume, PTV) and the surrounding healthy tissues within 5 Gy/fraction in twice daily fractions for two consecutive days. Four SIB plans were generated in the dual-arc modality; a basal dose of 20 Gy was prescribed to the PTV, while the BTV was boosted up to 40 Gy. For comparison purposes, plans obtained with a sequential boost (SEQ plans) were also generated. All plans were optimized to deliver at least 95% of the prescription dose to the targets. Dose contrast index (DCI), conformity index (CI), integral dose (ID), and the irradiated body volumes at 5, 10, and 20 Gy were evaluated.
At equal targets coverage, SIB plans provided major improvement in DCI, CI, and ID with respect to SEQ plans. When BTV dose escalated up to 200% of PTV prescription, DCI resulted in 66% for SIB plans and 37% for SEQ plans; the ID increase was only 11% for SIB plans (vs 27% for SEQ plans) and the increase in healthy tissues receiving more than 5, 10, and 20 Gy was less than 2%. Pretreatment dose verification reported a γ-value passing rate greater than 95% with 3%(global)-2 mm.
A modified SIB technique is dosimetrically feasible for large tumors, where doses higher than the tolerance dose of healthy tissues are necessary to increase the therapeutic gain.
本研究旨在评估在短程姑息性加速放疗期间,使用容积调强弧形放疗(VMAT)和同步整合加量(SIB)对有症状的大肿瘤进行高度异质性剂量规划和 delivery 的可行性。
选择一名有症状的巨大脊索瘤浸润右臀区域的患者。在剂量递增试验中,实施改良的 SIB 治疗,将肿瘤中心体积(加量靶区,BTV)照射至 10 Gy/分次,同时将其余肿瘤体积(计划靶区,PTV)和周围健康组织在连续两天每天两次的分次照射中维持在 5 Gy/分次以内。以双弧模式生成了四个 SIB 计划;PTV 的基础剂量规定为 20 Gy,而 BTV 加量至 40 Gy。为作比较,还生成了序贯加量(SEQ 计划)获得的计划。所有计划均进行优化,以将至少 95%的处方剂量输送至靶区。评估了剂量对比指数(DCI)、适形指数(CI)、积分剂量(ID)以及 5、10 和 20 Gy 时的受照身体体积。
在同等靶区覆盖情况下,SIB 计划在 DCI、CI 和 ID 方面相对于 SEQ 计划有显著改善。当 BTV 剂量递增至 PTV 处方剂量的 200%时,SIB 计划的 DCI 为 66%,SEQ 计划为 37%;SIB 计划的 ID 增加仅为 11%(SEQ 计划为 27%),接受超过 5、10 和 20 Gy 的健康组织增加量小于 2%。治疗前剂量验证报告γ值通过率大于 95%,3%(全局)-2 mm。
改良的 SIB 技术在剂量学上对于大肿瘤是可行的,在这种情况下,需要高于健康组织耐受剂量的剂量来提高治疗增益。