Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, 3535 Market Street Suite 600 N, Philadelphia, PA 19104,USA.
University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY, USA.
Psychol Med. 2019 Sep;49(12):1980-1989. doi: 10.1017/S0033291718002714. Epub 2018 Sep 17.
Few studies have investigated the patterns of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptom change in prolonged exposure (PE) therapy. In this study, we aimed to understand the patterns of PTSD symptom change in both PE and present-centered therapy (PCT).
Participants were active duty military personnel (N = 326, 89.3% male, 61.2% white, 32.5 years old) randomized to spaced-PE (S-PE; 10 sessions over 8 weeks), PCT (10 sessions over 8 weeks), or massed-PE (M-PE; 10 sessions over 2 weeks). Using latent profile analysis, we determined the optimal number of PTSD symptom change classes over time and analyzed whether baseline and follow-up variables were associated with class membership.
Five classes, namely rapid responder (7-17%), steep linear responder (14-22%), gradual responder (30-34%), non-responder (27-33%), and symptom exacerbation (7-13%) classes, characterized each treatment. No baseline clinical characteristics predicted class membership for S-PE and M-PE; in PCT, more negative baseline trauma cognitions predicted membership in the non-responder v. gradual responder class. Class membership was robustly associated with PTSD, trauma cognitions, and depression up to 6 months after treatment for both S-PE and M-PE but not for PCT.
Distinct profiles of treatment response emerged that were similar across interventions. By and large, no baseline variables predicted responder class. Responder status was a strong predictor of future symptom severity for PE, whereas response to PCT was not as strongly associated with future symptoms.
鲜有研究调查过延长暴露疗法(PE)中创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)症状变化的模式。本研究旨在了解 PE 和以当下为中心疗法(PCT)中 PTSD 症状变化的模式。
参与者为现役军人(N=326,89.3%为男性,61.2%为白人,年龄 32.5 岁),随机分配至间隔式 PE(S-PE;8 周内进行 10 次治疗)、PCT(8 周内进行 10 次治疗)或集中式 PE(M-PE;2 周内进行 10 次治疗)。我们采用潜在剖面分析,确定 PTSD 症状随时间变化的最佳分类数量,并分析基线和随访变量是否与分类成员有关。
5 种分类,即快速反应者(7-17%)、陡峭线性反应者(14-22%)、渐进反应者(30-34%)、无反应者(27-33%)和症状恶化者(7-13%),可描述每种治疗方法。基线临床特征无法预测 S-PE 和 M-PE 的分类成员;在 PCT 中,更多的负面基线创伤认知预测了非反应者与渐进反应者的分类成员。分类成员与 PTSD、创伤认知和抑郁的关系在 S-PE 和 M-PE 的治疗后 6 个月内都很稳健,但在 PCT 中并非如此。
出现了不同的治疗反应模式,在不同的干预措施中都很相似。总体而言,基线变量无法预测反应者的分类。反应者状态是 PE 未来症状严重程度的有力预测指标,而 PCT 的反应与未来症状的相关性并不强。