• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

群体性与强化门诊式延长暴露疗法治疗战斗相关创伤后应激障碍:一项随机临床试验。

Massed vs Intensive Outpatient Prolonged Exposure for Combat-Related Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio.

Research and Development Service, South Texas Veterans Health Care System, San Antonio.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jan 3;6(1):e2249422. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.49422.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.49422
PMID:
36602803
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9856757/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Improved, efficient, and acceptable treatments are needed for combat-related posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD).

OBJECTIVE

To determine the efficacy of 2 compressed prolonged exposure (PE) therapy outpatient treatments for combat-related PTSD.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This randomized clinical trial was conducted among military personnel and veterans at 4 sites in Texas from 2017 to 2019. Assessors were blinded to conditions. Data were analyzed from November 2020 to October 2022.

INTERVENTIONS

The interventions were massed-PE, which included 15 therapy sessions of 90 minutes each over 3 weeks, vs intensive outpatient program PE (IOP-PE), which included 15 full-day therapy sessions over 3 weeks with 8 treatment augmentations. The IOP-PE intervention was hypothesized to be superior to massed-PE.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Coprimary outcomes included the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (Fifth Edition) (DSM-5) (CAPS-5) and the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) administered at baseline and posttreatment follow-ups. Measures ranged from 0 to 80, with higher scores indicating greater severity. Diagnostic remission and reliable change were secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

Among 319 military personnel and veterans screened, 234 were randomized (mean [SD] age, 39.20 [7.72] years; 182 [78%] male participants), with 117 participants randomized to IOP-PE and 117 participants randomized to massed-PE. A total of 61 participants (26%) were African American, 58 participants (25%) were Hispanic, and 102 participants (44%) were White; 151 participants (65%) were married. Linear mixed-effects models found that CAPS-5 scores decreased in both treatment groups at the 1-month follow-up (IOP-PE: mean difference, -13.85 [95% CI, -16.47 to -11.23]; P < .001; massed-PE: mean difference, -14.13 [95% CI, -16.63 to -11.62]; P < .001). CAPS-5 change scores differed from 1- to 6-month follow-ups (mean difference, 4.44 [95% CI, 0.89 to 8.01]; P = .02). PTSD symptoms increased in massed-PE participants during follow-up (mean difference, 3.21 [95% CI, 0.65 to 5.77]; P = .01), whereas IOP-PE participants maintained treatment gains (mean difference, 1.23 [95% CI, -3.72 to 1.27]; P = .33). PCL-5 scores decreased in both groups from baseline to 1-month follow-up (IOP-PE: mean difference, -21.81 [95% CI, -25.57 to -18.04]; P < .001; massed-PE: mean difference, -19.96 [95% CI, -23.56 to -16.35]; P < .001) and were maintained at 6 months (IOP-PE: mean change, -0.21 [95% CI, -3.47 to 3.06]; P = .90; massed-PE: mean change, 3.02 [95% CI, -0.36 to 6.40]; P = .08). Both groups had notable PTSD diagnostic remission at posttreatment (IOP-PE: 48% [95% CI, 36% to 61%] of participants; massed-PE: 62% [95% CI, 51% to 73%] of participants), which was maintained at 6 months (IOP-PE: 53% [95% CI, 40% to 66%] of participants; massed-PE: 52% [95% CI, 38% to 66%] of participants). Most participants demonstrated reliable change on the CAPS-5 (61% [95% CI, 52% to 69%] of participants) and the PCL-5 (74% [95% CI, 66% to 81%] of participants) at the 1-month follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

These findings suggest that PE can be adapted into compressed treatment formats that effectively reduce PTSD symptoms.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03529435.

摘要

重要性

需要改进、有效的且可接受的治疗方法来治疗与战斗相关的创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)。

目的

确定 2 种压缩式延长暴露(PE)治疗门诊治疗与战斗相关 PTSD 的疗效。

设计、地点和参与者:这项随机临床试验于 2017 年至 2019 年在德克萨斯州的 4 个地点进行,参与者为军人和退伍军人。评估人员对条件一无所知。数据于 2020 年 11 月至 2022 年 10 月进行分析。

干预措施

干预措施为集中式 PE,包括 15 次每次 90 分钟的治疗,共 3 周;强化门诊计划 PE(IOP-PE),包括 15 次全天治疗,共 3 周,有 8 次治疗增强。假设 IOP-PE 干预优于集中式 PE。

主要结果和测量指标

主要结果包括基于《精神障碍诊断与统计手册(第五版)》(DSM-5)的临床医生管理 PTSD 量表(CAPS-5)和 PTSD 检查表(DSM-5)(PCL-5),在基线和治疗后随访时进行测量。测量范围从 0 到 80,得分越高表示症状越严重。诊断缓解和可靠变化是次要结果。

结果

在筛选的 319 名军人和退伍军人中,有 234 名被随机分组(平均[标准差]年龄,39.20[7.72]岁;182[78%]名男性参与者),其中 117 名被随机分配至 IOP-PE 组,117 名被随机分配至集中式 PE 组。共有 61 名参与者(26%)为非裔美国人,58 名参与者(25%)为西班牙裔,102 名参与者(44%)为白人;151 名参与者(65%)已婚。线性混合效应模型发现,两组在 1 个月随访时 CAPS-5 评分均降低(IOP-PE:平均差异,-13.85[95%CI,-16.47 至-11.23];P<0.001;集中式 PE:平均差异,-14.13[95%CI,-16.63 至-11.62];P<0.001)。从 1 个月到 6 个月的随访中,CAPS-5 变化评分不同(平均差异,4.44[95%CI,0.89 至 8.01];P=0.02)。集中式 PE 组的 PTSD 症状在随访期间增加(平均差异,3.21[95%CI,0.65 至 5.77];P=0.01),而 IOP-PE 组则保持治疗效果(平均差异,1.23[95%CI,-3.72 至 1.27];P=0.33)。两组在基线到 1 个月随访时 PCL-5 评分均降低(IOP-PE:平均差异,-21.81[95%CI,-25.57 至-18.04];P<0.001;集中式 PE:平均差异,-19.96[95%CI,-23.56 至-16.35];P<0.001),并在 6 个月时保持稳定(IOP-PE:平均变化,-0.21[95%CI,-3.47 至 3.06];P=0.90;集中式 PE:平均变化,3.02[95%CI,-0.36 至 6.40];P=0.08)。两组在治疗后均有显著的 PTSD 诊断缓解(IOP-PE:48%[95%CI,36% 至 61%]的参与者;集中式 PE:62%[95%CI,51% 至 73%]的参与者),并在 6 个月时保持稳定(IOP-PE:53%[95%CI,40% 至 66%]的参与者;集中式 PE:52%[95%CI,38% 至 66%]的参与者)。大多数参与者在 1 个月随访时在 CAPS-5(61%[95%CI,52% 至 69%]的参与者)和 PCL-5(74%[95%CI,66% 至 81%]的参与者)上表现出可靠的变化。

结论和相关性

这些发现表明,PE 可以改编为压缩式治疗方案,有效减轻 PTSD 症状。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT03529435。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d003/9856757/d3c587b66e24/jamanetwopen-e2249422-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d003/9856757/d1753f86dda3/jamanetwopen-e2249422-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d003/9856757/acbe04969fe7/jamanetwopen-e2249422-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d003/9856757/d3c587b66e24/jamanetwopen-e2249422-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d003/9856757/d1753f86dda3/jamanetwopen-e2249422-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d003/9856757/acbe04969fe7/jamanetwopen-e2249422-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d003/9856757/d3c587b66e24/jamanetwopen-e2249422-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Massed vs Intensive Outpatient Prolonged Exposure for Combat-Related Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial.群体性与强化门诊式延长暴露疗法治疗战斗相关创伤后应激障碍:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jan 3;6(1):e2249422. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.49422.
2
Effect of Prolonged Exposure Therapy Delivered Over 2 Weeks vs 8 Weeks vs Present-Centered Therapy on PTSD Symptom Severity in Military Personnel: A Randomized Clinical Trial.为期2周、8周的延长暴露疗法与以当下为中心疗法对军事人员创伤后应激障碍症状严重程度的影响:一项随机临床试验
JAMA. 2018 Jan 23;319(4):354-364. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.21242.
3
Comparison of Prolonged Exposure vs Cognitive Processing Therapy for Treatment of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Among US Veterans: A Randomized Clinical Trial.比较延长暴露疗法与认知加工疗法治疗美国退伍军人创伤后应激障碍的效果:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jan 4;5(1):e2136921. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.36921.
4
Service Dogs for Veterans and Military Members With Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial.服务犬对创伤后应激障碍退伍军人和军人的作用:一项非随机对照试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jun 3;7(6):e2414686. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.14686.
5
Loving-Kindness Meditation vs Cognitive Processing Therapy for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Among Veterans: A Randomized Clinical Trial.慈心冥想与认知加工疗法治疗退伍军人创伤后应激障碍的随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Apr 1;4(4):e216604. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.6604.
6
Written Exposure Therapy vs Prolonged Exposure Therapy in the Treatment of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial.书面暴露疗法与延长暴露疗法治疗创伤后应激障碍的随机临床试验。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2023 Nov 1;80(11):1093-1100. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2023.2810.
7
Effect of Group vs Individual Cognitive Processing Therapy in Active-Duty Military Seeking Treatment for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial.团体与个体认知加工治疗对寻求创伤后应激障碍治疗的现役军人的效果:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2017 Jan 1;74(1):28-36. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.2729.
8
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Veterans With Comorbid Posttraumatic Headache and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Symptoms: A Randomized Clinical Trial.创伤后头痛和创伤后应激障碍症状并存的退伍军人认知行为治疗:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Neurol. 2022 Aug 1;79(8):746-757. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2022.1567.
9
Effect of Written Exposure Therapy vs Cognitive Processing Therapy on Increasing Treatment Efficiency Among Military Service Members With Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: A Randomized Noninferiority Trial.书面暴露疗法与认知加工疗法对提高创伤后应激障碍军人治疗效率的影响:一项随机非劣效性试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jan 4;5(1):e2140911. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.40911.
10
Yoga vs Cognitive Processing Therapy for Military Sexual Trauma-Related Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial.瑜伽与认知加工疗法治疗军事相关创伤后应激障碍:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Dec 1;6(12):e2344862. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.44862.

引用本文的文献

1
Accelerated Prolonged Exposure Therapy for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in a Veterans Health Administration System.退伍军人健康管理系统中创伤后应激障碍的加速延长暴露疗法
Fed Pract. 2025 Apr;42(Suppl 1):S6-S11. doi: 10.12788/fp.0568. Epub 2025 Apr 2.
2
RESET post-traumatic stress disorder: clinical protocol integrating reconsolidation, exposure, short-term emotional transformation.重置创伤后应激障碍:整合重新巩固、暴露和短期情绪转变的临床方案
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2025 Dec;16(1):2540141. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2025.2540141. Epub 2025 Aug 15.
3
Differential Effects of Hazardous Drinking on Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Outcomes Across Two Prolonged Exposure Treatment Formats.

本文引用的文献

1
Catastrophic Health Consequences of the War in Ukraine.乌克兰战争带来的灾难性健康后果。
JAMA. 2022 Apr 26;327(16):1549-1550. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.6046.
2
General Perspective on the U.S. Military Conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan After 20 Years.20 年后对美国在伊拉克和阿富汗军事冲突的总体看法。
Mil Med. 2022 Aug 25;187(9-10):248-251. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usab496.
3
STRONG STAR and the Consortium to Alleviate PTSD: Shaping the future of combat PTSD and related conditions in military and veteran populations.STRONG 星计划和创伤后应激障碍缓解联合会:塑造军事和退伍军人人群中战斗创伤后应激障碍和相关病症的未来。
两种延长暴露治疗形式下有害饮酒对创伤后应激障碍结局的不同影响。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Jul 15;15(7):954. doi: 10.3390/bs15070954.
4
Personality traits as predictors of PTSD and depression symptoms following exposure-based treatment in an intensive outpatient program.在强化门诊项目中,基于暴露疗法治疗后,人格特质作为创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)和抑郁症状的预测指标
J Mood Anxiety Disord. 2025 Apr 19;11:100123. doi: 10.1016/j.xjmad.2025.100123. eCollection 2025 Sep.
5
PTSD Symptoms change in response to a brief intensive trauma-focused treatment programme in non-veterans and veterans with war-related PTSD.创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)症状会因针对非退伍军人以及患有与战争相关创伤后应激障碍的退伍军人开展的简短强化创伤聚焦治疗方案而发生变化。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2025 Dec;16(1):2511571. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2025.2511571. Epub 2025 Jun 19.
6
Cost-effectiveness of massed versus spaced trauma-focused treatment as first-line treatment for post-traumatic stress disorder in adults with multiple trauma exposure: protocol for a single-blind non-inferiority randomised controlled trial.集中式与分散式创伤聚焦治疗作为多次创伤暴露的成人创伤后应激障碍一线治疗的成本效益:一项单盲非劣效随机对照试验方案
BMJ Open. 2025 May 23;15(5):e102530. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-102530.
7
Loss of PTSD Diagnosis in Response to Evidence-Based Treatments: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.基于循证治疗的创伤后应激障碍诊断消失:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
JAMA Psychiatry. 2025 May 21. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2025.0695.
8
Massed treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder, traumatic brain injury, and co-occurring conditions: the Home Base intensive outpatient program for military veterans and service members.创伤后应激障碍、创伤性脑损伤及共病的集中治疗:面向退伍军人和现役军人的“大本营”强化门诊项目
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Oct 30;15:1387186. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1387186. eCollection 2024.
9
"It made me feel more alive": A qualitative analysis of quality of life improvements following completion of trauma-focused therapy for posttraumatic stress disorder.“它让我感觉更有活力”:对创伤后应激障碍患者完成创伤聚焦治疗后生活质量改善情况的定性分析
J Trauma Stress. 2025 Feb;38(1):158-164. doi: 10.1002/jts.23091. Epub 2024 Aug 2.
10
[Evidence-based psychotherapy of posttraumatic stress syndrome-An update].[创伤后应激障碍的循证心理治疗——最新进展]
Nervenarzt. 2024 Jul;95(7):616-621. doi: 10.1007/s00115-024-01694-6. Epub 2024 Jun 21.
Contemp Clin Trials. 2021 Nov;110:106583. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2021.106583. Epub 2021 Sep 29.
4
Treatment response trajectories in a three-week CPT-Based intensive treatment for veterans with PTSD.基于 CPT 的 PTSD 退伍军人三周强化治疗中的治疗反应轨迹。
J Psychiatr Res. 2021 Sep;141:226-232. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2021.07.004. Epub 2021 Jul 5.
5
Intensive outpatient treatment for PTSD: a pilot feasibility study combining prolonged exposure therapy, EMDR, physical activity, and psychoeducation.创伤后应激障碍强化门诊治疗:一项结合延长暴露疗法、眼动脱敏再处理、体育活动和心理教育的初步可行性研究。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2021 May 14;12(1):1917878. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2021.1917878.
6
Disability Status Attenuates Treatment Effects in an Intensive Outpatient Program for PTSD.残疾状况会减弱 PTSD 强化门诊治疗方案的效果。
Mil Med. 2021 Jan 25;186(Suppl 1):190-197. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usaa394.
7
An intensive outpatient program with prolonged exposure for veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder: Retention, predictors, and patterns of change.创伤后应激障碍退伍军人的强化门诊治疗计划:保留率、预测因素和变化模式。
Psychol Serv. 2021 Nov;18(4):606-618. doi: 10.1037/ser0000422. Epub 2020 Jul 13.
8
An epidemiological evaluation of trauma types in a cohort of deployed service members.部署的现役军人创伤类型的流行病学评估。
Psychol Trauma. 2019 Nov;11(8):877-885. doi: 10.1037/tra0000465. Epub 2019 May 9.
9
PTSD symptom clusters and suicide attempts among high-risk military service members: A three-month prospective investigation.创伤后应激障碍症状群与高危军人群体中的自杀企图:一项为期三个月的前瞻性调查。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2019 Jan;87(1):67-78. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000350. Epub 2018 Nov 15.
10
Psychometric properties of a brief measure of posttraumatic stress disorder-related impairment: The Brief Inventory of Psychosocial Functioning.创伤后应激障碍相关损伤简易测量工具的心理计量学特性:心理社会功能简短清单。
Psychol Serv. 2020 May;17(2):187-194. doi: 10.1037/ser0000306. Epub 2018 Oct 8.