Interventional Radiology Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Interventional Radiology Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Clin Radiol. 2018 Dec;73(12):1057.e1-1057.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2018.08.005. Epub 2018 Sep 13.
To evaluate arterial cone-beam computed tomography (A-CBCT) automated analysis software for identification of vessels supplying tumours during transarterial hepatic embolisation (TAE).
This study was approved by the institutional review board, with waiver of consent. Consecutive TAE procedures using arterial mapping software (AMS), and performed between February 2014 and August 2014, were reviewed. Hepatic arteries were imaged using digital subtraction angiography (DSA) as well as A-CBCT processed with AMS. Interventional radiologists reported potential embolisation target vessels computed using AMS versus DSA alone, modification of the embolisation plan based on AMS, and operator confidence related to technical success. Imaging set-up, processing time, radiation dose, and contrast media volume were recorded.
Thirty of 34 consecutive procedures were evaluated retrospectively. At least one additional embolisation target vessel was identified using AMS in 13 procedures (43%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 26-61%) and embolisation plan modified in 11 (37%, 95% CI: 19-54%). Radiologists reported AMS increased operator confidence and reduced the number of DSA acquisitions in 25 (83%, 95% CI: 70-97%) and 15 cases (50%, 95% CI: 32-68%), respectively. The average A-CBCT acquisition and processing time was 4 minutes 53 seconds and 3 minutes 45 seconds, respectively. A-CBCT contributed to 11% of the radiation dose and 18% of the contrast media volume.
Physicians report increased tumour supplying vessel detection and intraprocedural confidence using AMS during TAE without substantial impact on radiation dose, contrast media volume, and procedure time.
评估动脉锥形束 CT(A-CBCT)自动分析软件在经动脉肝栓塞术(TAE)中识别肿瘤供血血管的能力。
本研究经机构审查委员会批准,豁免知情同意。回顾性分析 2014 年 2 月至 2014 年 8 月期间连续进行的使用动脉图谱软件(AMS)的 TAE 手术。使用数字减影血管造影(DSA)和 AMS 处理的 A-CBCT 对肝动脉进行成像。介入放射科医生报告了使用 AMS 计算的与 DSA 相比潜在的栓塞目标血管、基于 AMS 对栓塞计划的修改,以及与技术成功相关的操作人员信心。记录了成像设置、处理时间、辐射剂量和对比剂体积。
回顾性评估了 34 例连续手术中的 30 例。在 13 例(43%,95%置信区间 [CI]:26-61%)中使用 AMS 确定了至少一个额外的栓塞目标血管,并在 11 例(37%,95% CI:19-54%)中修改了栓塞计划。放射科医生报告 AMS 增加了操作人员的信心,并分别减少了 25 例(83%,95% CI:70-97%)和 15 例(50%,95% CI:32-68%)中的 DSA 采集次数。A-CBCT 的平均采集和处理时间分别为 4 分 53 秒和 3 分 45 秒。A-CBCT 导致 11%的辐射剂量和 18%的对比剂体积增加。
在 TAE 中,医生报告使用 AMS 可以增加肿瘤供血血管的检测,并提高术中信心,而不会对辐射剂量、对比剂体积和手术时间产生实质性影响。