• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从内镜黏膜下剥离术转为挽救性分片刀辅助圈套切除术切除病变:一个源自术前的风险评分。

Switching from endoscopic submucosal dissection to salvage piecemeal knife-assisted snare resection to remove a lesion: A preoperative risk score from the beginning.

机构信息

Medicina Ap. Digestivo, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, España.

Unidad de Investigación Clínica. IMAS12-CIBERESP, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre.

出版信息

Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2018 Nov;110(11):699-705. doi: 10.17235/reed.2018.5608/2018.

DOI:10.17235/reed.2018.5608/2018
PMID:30221971
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in the Western setting remains a challenge. Therefore, other simplified techniques such as knife-assisted snare resection (KAR) have been reported to overcome this issue.

METHODS

patients who underwent an ESD for the treatment of gastrointestinal neoplasms were included in a retrospective cross-sectional observational study. Factors associated with the end of ESD as a salvage p-KAR were identified and a logistic regression model was developed.

RESULTS

a total of 136 lesions in 133 patients were analyzed. Operator experience of under 50 cases and the combination of lesion size > 30 mm and colorectal location were independent predictive factors for switching to a salvage p-KAR according to the multivariate logistic regression analysis. We developed a risk scoring system based on these four variables (experience, size, location and the combination of size and location) with a receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.81 (95% CI: 0.74-0.89). The diagnostic accuracy of the score for a cut-off point ≥ 5 had a sensitivity of 0.79 (95% CI: 0.66-0.93) and a specificity of 0.71 (95% CI: 0.61-0.80).

CONCLUSION

a simple predictive score system that includes four preoperative factors accurately predicts ESD to finish as a p-KAR. A careful selection of cases considering these variables could be useful to achieve better outcomes in the Western setting.

摘要

背景和目的

在西方环境中,内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)仍然具有挑战性。因此,已经报道了其他简化技术,例如刀辅助圈套切除术(KAR),以克服这个问题。

方法

本回顾性横断面观察性研究纳入了因胃肠道肿瘤而行 ESD 治疗的患者。确定了与 ESD 结束转为挽救性 p-KAR 相关的因素,并建立了逻辑回归模型。

结果

共分析了 133 例患者的 136 个病变。根据多变量逻辑回归分析,操作者经验少于 50 例以及病变大小>30mm 与结直肠位置的组合是转为挽救性 p-KAR 的独立预测因素。我们基于这四个变量(经验、大小、位置以及大小和位置的组合)制定了风险评分系统,其受试者工作特征曲线为 0.81(95%CI:0.74-0.89)。评分≥5 的截断点的诊断准确性为 0.79(95%CI:0.66-0.93)的敏感性和 0.71(95%CI:0.61-0.80)的特异性。

结论

一个包含四个术前因素的简单预测评分系统可以准确预测 ESD 转为挽救性 p-KAR。考虑这些变量对病例进行仔细选择可能有助于在西方环境中实现更好的结果。

相似文献

1
Switching from endoscopic submucosal dissection to salvage piecemeal knife-assisted snare resection to remove a lesion: A preoperative risk score from the beginning.从内镜黏膜下剥离术转为挽救性分片刀辅助圈套切除术切除病变:一个源自术前的风险评分。
Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2018 Nov;110(11):699-705. doi: 10.17235/reed.2018.5608/2018.
2
Prediction model and risk score for perforation in patients undergoing colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection.结直肠内镜黏膜下剥离术患者穿孔的预测模型及风险评分
Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Jul;84(1):98-108. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.12.011. Epub 2015 Dec 19.
3
Knife-assisted snare resection (KAR) of large and refractory colonic polyps at a Western centre: Feasibility, safety and efficacy study to guide future practice.西方中心行结肠镜下圈套器辅助切除术(KAR)治疗大且难治性结肠息肉:指导未来实践的可行性、安全性和疗效研究。
United European Gastroenterol J. 2016 Jun;4(3):466-73. doi: 10.1177/2050640615615301. Epub 2015 Nov 13.
4
Risk factors associated with difficult gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection: predicting difficult ESD.与困难的胃内镜黏膜下剥离术相关的危险因素:预测困难的内镜黏膜下剥离术
Surg Endosc. 2017 Apr;31(4):1617-1626. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5149-6. Epub 2016 Aug 5.
5
Splash M-knife versus Flush Knife BT in the technical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer: a propensity score matching analysis.早期胃癌内镜黏膜下剥离术技术结果中飞溅式M刀与Flush刀BT的比较:倾向评分匹配分析
BMC Gastroenterol. 2018 Feb 27;18(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12876-018-0763-5.
6
Prediction model for non-curative resection of endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients with early gastric cancer.早期胃癌患者内镜下黏膜下剥离术非根治性切除的预测模型
Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 May;85(5):976-983. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.10.018. Epub 2016 Oct 15.
7
Clinical outcomes of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection and risk factors associated with piecemeal resection.结直肠内镜黏膜下剥离术的临床结局及与分片切除相关的危险因素
Turk J Gastroenterol. 2018 Jul;29(4):473-480. doi: 10.5152/tjg.2018.17400.
8
Endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastric neoplasms using a snare tip.使用圈套器尖端进行胃肿瘤的内镜黏膜下剥离术。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2018 Feb;53(2):238-242. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2017.1410567. Epub 2017 Nov 28.
9
Factors Predictive of Complete Excision of Large Colorectal Neoplasia Using Hybrid Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A KASID Multicenter Study.使用混合内镜黏膜下剥离术切除大肠大肿瘤的预测因素:KASID 多中心研究。
Dig Dis Sci. 2018 Oct;63(10):2773-2779. doi: 10.1007/s10620-018-5140-2. Epub 2018 Jun 7.
10
[Efficacy comparison between surgical resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection of early gastric cancer in a domestic single center].[国内单中心早期胃癌手术切除与内镜黏膜下剥离术的疗效比较]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018 Feb 25;21(2):190-195.