Geiger Mary Jane, Mehta Cyrus, Turner J Rick, Arbet-Engels Christophe, Hantel Stefan, Hirshberg Boaz, Koglin Joerg, Mendzelevski Boaz, Sager Philip T, Shapiro Deborah, Stewart Murray, Todaro Thomas G, Gaydos Brenda
1 Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc, Tarrytown, NY, USA.
2 Cytel Inc and Harvard School of Public Health, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2015 Jan;49(1):50-64. doi: 10.1177/2168479014549860.
In December 2008, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a guidance for industry requiring sponsors to demonstrate that a new antidiabetic therapy being developed to treat type 2 diabetes does not increase cardiovascular (CV) risk to an unacceptable extent. CV events reported during phase 2 and phase 3 trials should be prospectively and independently adjudicated. Before submission of a new drug application or biologics license application, sponsors should compare the incidence of major CV events occurring with the investigational agent versus the control group to show that the upper bound of the 2-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) for the estimated risk ratio is less than 1.8. If the CI includes 1.3, a postmarketing trial will be necessary to definitively show that the upper bound of the 95% CI for the estimated risk ratio is then less than 1.3. In 2012, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) issued an updated guideline on the clinical investigation of medicinal products in the treatment or prevention of diabetes mellitus that detailed its CV safety assessment requirements. Although similar to the FDA guidance, the EMA guideline does not prospectively define any pre- or postapproval risk margins. This expert perspective, prepared by members of the Cardiac Safety Research Consortium, discusses clinical development strategies, operational issues, and statistical methodological issues to satisfy the FDA's CV safety requirements, and, where appropriate, the EMA guideline. Actual case examples, where applicable, are presented.
2008年12月,美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)发布了一项行业指南,要求申办方证明正在研发的用于治疗2型糖尿病的新型抗糖尿病疗法不会将心血管(CV)风险增加到不可接受的程度。在2期和3期试验期间报告的CV事件应进行前瞻性和独立判定。在提交新药申请或生物制品许可申请之前,申办方应比较使用研究药物与对照组发生主要CV事件的发生率,以表明估计风险比的双侧95%置信区间(CI)的上限小于1.8。如果CI包含1.3,则需要进行上市后试验,以明确表明估计风险比的95%CI的上限小于1.3。2012年,欧洲药品管理局(EMA)发布了一份关于治疗或预防糖尿病的药品临床研究的更新指南,详细阐述了其CV安全性评估要求。尽管与FDA指南类似,但EMA指南并未前瞻性地定义任何批准前或批准后的风险边际。本专家观点由心脏安全研究联盟的成员撰写,讨论了满足FDA的CV安全要求以及在适当时满足EMA指南的临床开发策略、操作问题和统计方法问题。如有适用,还将给出实际案例。