• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

前瞻性评估2型糖尿病新型抗糖尿病疗法心血管风险的临床开发方法和统计方法

Clinical Development Approaches and Statistical Methodologies to Prospectively Assess the Cardiovascular Risk of New Antidiabetic Therapies for Type 2 Diabetes.

作者信息

Geiger Mary Jane, Mehta Cyrus, Turner J Rick, Arbet-Engels Christophe, Hantel Stefan, Hirshberg Boaz, Koglin Joerg, Mendzelevski Boaz, Sager Philip T, Shapiro Deborah, Stewart Murray, Todaro Thomas G, Gaydos Brenda

机构信息

1 Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc, Tarrytown, NY, USA.

2 Cytel Inc and Harvard School of Public Health, Cambridge, MA, USA.

出版信息

Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2015 Jan;49(1):50-64. doi: 10.1177/2168479014549860.

DOI:10.1177/2168479014549860
PMID:30222452
Abstract

In December 2008, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a guidance for industry requiring sponsors to demonstrate that a new antidiabetic therapy being developed to treat type 2 diabetes does not increase cardiovascular (CV) risk to an unacceptable extent. CV events reported during phase 2 and phase 3 trials should be prospectively and independently adjudicated. Before submission of a new drug application or biologics license application, sponsors should compare the incidence of major CV events occurring with the investigational agent versus the control group to show that the upper bound of the 2-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) for the estimated risk ratio is less than 1.8. If the CI includes 1.3, a postmarketing trial will be necessary to definitively show that the upper bound of the 95% CI for the estimated risk ratio is then less than 1.3. In 2012, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) issued an updated guideline on the clinical investigation of medicinal products in the treatment or prevention of diabetes mellitus that detailed its CV safety assessment requirements. Although similar to the FDA guidance, the EMA guideline does not prospectively define any pre- or postapproval risk margins. This expert perspective, prepared by members of the Cardiac Safety Research Consortium, discusses clinical development strategies, operational issues, and statistical methodological issues to satisfy the FDA's CV safety requirements, and, where appropriate, the EMA guideline. Actual case examples, where applicable, are presented.

摘要

2008年12月,美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)发布了一项行业指南,要求申办方证明正在研发的用于治疗2型糖尿病的新型抗糖尿病疗法不会将心血管(CV)风险增加到不可接受的程度。在2期和3期试验期间报告的CV事件应进行前瞻性和独立判定。在提交新药申请或生物制品许可申请之前,申办方应比较使用研究药物与对照组发生主要CV事件的发生率,以表明估计风险比的双侧95%置信区间(CI)的上限小于1.8。如果CI包含1.3,则需要进行上市后试验,以明确表明估计风险比的95%CI的上限小于1.3。2012年,欧洲药品管理局(EMA)发布了一份关于治疗或预防糖尿病的药品临床研究的更新指南,详细阐述了其CV安全性评估要求。尽管与FDA指南类似,但EMA指南并未前瞻性地定义任何批准前或批准后的风险边际。本专家观点由心脏安全研究联盟的成员撰写,讨论了满足FDA的CV安全要求以及在适当时满足EMA指南的临床开发策略、操作问题和统计方法问题。如有适用,还将给出实际案例。

相似文献

1
Clinical Development Approaches and Statistical Methodologies to Prospectively Assess the Cardiovascular Risk of New Antidiabetic Therapies for Type 2 Diabetes.前瞻性评估2型糖尿病新型抗糖尿病疗法心血管风险的临床开发方法和统计方法
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2015 Jan;49(1):50-64. doi: 10.1177/2168479014549860.
2
Cardiovascular Mortality of Oral Antidiabetic Drugs Approved Before and After the 2008 US FDA Guidance for Industry: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis.口服降糖药心血管死亡率:2008 年美国 FDA 行业指南前后批准的药物:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Drug Investig. 2018 Jun;38(6):491-501. doi: 10.1007/s40261-018-0639-z.
3
Cardiovascular safety for once-weekly dulaglutide in type 2 diabetes: a pre-specified meta-analysis of prospectively adjudicated cardiovascular events.度拉糖肽每周一次治疗2型糖尿病的心血管安全性:一项关于前瞻性判定心血管事件的预设荟萃分析。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2016 Feb 24;15:38. doi: 10.1186/s12933-016-0355-z.
4
Lessons learned from independent central review.独立中央审查的经验教训。
Eur J Cancer. 2009 Jan;45(2):268-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.031.
5
Mitigating Cardiovascular Risk in Type 2 Diabetes With Antidiabetes Drugs: A Review of Principal Cardiovascular Outcome Results of EMPA-REG OUTCOME, LEADER, and SUSTAIN-6 Trials.在 2 型糖尿病中使用抗糖尿病药物降低心血管风险:EMPA-REG OUTCOME、LEADER 和 SUSTAIN-6 试验主要心血管结局结果的综述。
Diabetes Care. 2017 Jul;40(7):821-831. doi: 10.2337/dc17-0291.
6
EXamination of cArdiovascular outcoMes with alogliptIN versus standard of carE in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and acute coronary syndrome (EXAMINE): a cardiovascular safety study of the dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor alogliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes with acute coronary syndrome.检查心血管结果用阿格列汀与标准的护理在患者与 2 型糖尿病和急性冠脉综合征 (检查):心血管安全性研究的二肽基肽酶 4 抑制剂阿格列汀在患者 2 型糖尿病与急性冠脉综合征。
Am Heart J. 2011 Oct;162(4):620-626.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2011.08.004. Epub 2011 Sep 14.
7
Causality Assessment in Premarketing Drug Clinical Trials: Regulatory Evolution in the USA and Ongoing Concerns.上市前药物临床试验中的因果关系评估:美国的监管演变及持续关注的问题
Drug Saf. 2016 Oct;39(10):895-901. doi: 10.1007/s40264-016-0442-9.
8
Comparisons of Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency risk management implementation for recent pharmaceutical approvals: report of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and outcomes research risk benefit management working group.近期药物批准的美国食品药品监督管理局和欧洲药品管理局风险管理实施比较:国际药物经济学和结果研究学会风险获益管理工作组的报告。
Value Health. 2012 Dec;15(8):1108-18. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2012.06.019. Epub 2012 Nov 3.
9
Cardiovascular safety of the dipetidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor alogliptin in type 2 diabetes mellitus.二肽基肽酶-4 抑制剂阿格列汀在 2 型糖尿病中的心血管安全性。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2013 Jul;15(7):668-73. doi: 10.1111/dom.12093. Epub 2013 Apr 4.
10
Effect of US Food and Drug Administration's Cardiovascular Safety Guidance on Diabetes Drug Development.美国食品药品监督管理局心血管安全指南对糖尿病药物研发的影响。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2017 Aug;102(2):290-296. doi: 10.1002/cpt.705. Epub 2017 May 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Rationale, study design and methodology of the LANDMARC trial: a 3-year, pan-India, prospective, longitudinal study to assess management and real-world outcomes of diabetes mellitus.LANDMARC 试验的原理、研究设计和方法学:一项为期 3 年、全印度范围、前瞻性、纵向研究,旨在评估糖尿病的管理和真实世界结局。
Diabet Med. 2020 May;37(5):885-892. doi: 10.1111/dme.14171. Epub 2019 Dec 15.
2
Long-Term Evaluation of the Effects of Aclidinium Bromide on Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events and COPD Exacerbations in Patients with Moderate to Very Severe COPD: Rationale and Design of the ASCENT COPD Study.阿地溴铵对中重度至极重度慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者主要不良心血管事件和COPD急性加重影响的长期评估:ASCENT COPD研究的原理与设计
Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis. 2018 Jan 24;5(1):5-15. doi: 10.15326/jcopdf.5.1.2017.0149.
3
Advances in the management of cardiovascular risk for patients with type 2 diabetes: perspectives from the Academy for Cardiovascular Risk, Outcomes and Safety Studies in Type 2 Diabetes.2型糖尿病患者心血管疾病风险管理的进展:来自2型糖尿病心血管风险、结局与安全性研究学会的观点
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2017 Jan 13;13:69-79. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S121804. eCollection 2017.