Department of Cardiology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, China, No.1 Dahua Road, Dong Dan, Beijing 100730, PR China.
Department of Pathology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, China, No.1 Dahua Road, Dong Dan, Beijing 100730, PR China.
Int J Cardiol. 2018 Oct 15;269:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.06.069. Epub 2018 Jun 20.
Left Anterior Fascicular Block (LAFB) occurs frequently among the elderly, and have a correlation with coronary artery disease (CAD), yet controversies regarding its clinical significance still remain.
We carried on a retrospective study involving 92 LAFB and 478 non-LAFB patients, in which anatomic, clinical and electrocardiographic characteristics were compared.
LAFB subjects had more pathological CAD (66.3% vs 54.6%, P = 0.039), myocardial infarction (MI) (53.3% vs 37.9%, P = 0.007) and myocarditis (5.4% vs 1.7%, P = 0.043). Among the LAFB group, 58.1% of patients with CAD and 30.2% of patients with MI were clinically misdiagnosed, while 42.9% of patients with MI were clinically missed. Logistic regression showed CAD had no independent relevance with LAFB. LAFB subjects displayed heavier hearts [(451.1 ± 101.3)g vs (407.1 ± 102.3)g, P < 0.001], thicker left ventricular walls [(1.6 ± 0.4)cm vs (1.4 ± 0.3)cm, P = 0.001]. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis indicated significant differences in long-term survival time (χ = 12.223, P < 0.001) and cardiac mortality (χ = 20.982, P < 0.001) between LAFB and non-LAFB group. Cox multivariate analysis demonstrated LAFB was an independent risk factor of all-cause death (HR = 1.552, 95% CI = 1.208-1.994, P = 0.001) and cardiac death (HR = 2.287, 95% CI = 1.545-3.386, P < 0.001). The major death cause of LAFB was cardiac death (46.7%), including more MI (28.3% vs 13.4%, P = 0.008), myocarditis (4.3% vs 1.0%, P = 0.042) and cardiac rupture (6.7% vs 1.9%, P = 0.022).
LAFB subjects had more pathological CAD and MI, but LAFB was not an independent relevant factor of CAD. LAFB lowered the accuracy to clinically diagnose CAD. LAFB patients gained heavier hearts, thicker left ventricular walls, and suffered increased risk of death and cardiac death.
左前分支阻滞(LAFB)在老年人中较为常见,与冠状动脉疾病(CAD)有关,但关于其临床意义仍存在争议。
我们进行了一项回顾性研究,涉及 92 例 LAFB 患者和 478 例非 LAFB 患者,比较了解剖学、临床和心电图特征。
LAFB 患者有更多的病理性 CAD(66.3%比 54.6%,P=0.039)、心肌梗死(MI)(53.3%比 37.9%,P=0.007)和心肌炎(5.4%比 1.7%,P=0.043)。在 LAFB 组中,58.1%的 CAD 患者和 30.2%的 MI 患者临床误诊,而 42.9%的 MI 患者临床漏诊。Logistic 回归显示 CAD 与 LAFB 无独立相关性。LAFB 患者的心脏重量更大[(451.1±101.3)g 比 (407.1±102.3)g,P<0.001],左心室壁更厚[(1.6±0.4)cm 比 (1.4±0.3)cm,P=0.001]。Kaplan-Meier 生存分析表明 LAFB 组与非 LAFB 组在长期生存时间(χ²=12.223,P<0.001)和心脏死亡率(χ²=20.982,P<0.001)方面存在显著差异。Cox 多因素分析表明 LAFB 是全因死亡(HR=1.552,95%CI=1.208-1.994,P=0.001)和心脏死亡(HR=2.287,95%CI=1.545-3.386,P<0.001)的独立危险因素。LAFB 的主要死亡原因是心脏性死亡(46.7%),包括更多的 MI(28.3%比 13.4%,P=0.008)、心肌炎(4.3%比 1.0%,P=0.042)和心脏破裂(6.7%比 1.9%,P=0.022)。
LAFB 患者有更多的病理性 CAD 和 MI,但 LAFB 不是 CAD 的独立相关因素。LAFB 降低了临床诊断 CAD 的准确性。LAFB 患者的心脏更重,左心室壁更厚,死亡和心脏死亡风险增加。