• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2014年两极分化的乌克兰:基于推特数据参数化的有界置信度XY模型所展示的观点和领土分裂

Polarized Ukraine 2014: opinion and territorial split demonstrated with the bounded confidence XY model, parametrized by Twitter data.

作者信息

Romenskyy Maksym, Spaiser Viktoria, Ihle Thomas, Lobaskin Vladimir

机构信息

Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK.

Department of Mathematics, Uppsala University, Uppsala 75106, Sweden.

出版信息

R Soc Open Sci. 2018 Aug 1;5(8):171935. doi: 10.1098/rsos.171935. eCollection 2018 Aug.

DOI:10.1098/rsos.171935
PMID:30224983
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6124111/
Abstract

Multiple countries have recently experienced extreme political polarization, which, in some cases, led to escalation of hate crime, violence and political instability. Besides the much discussed presidential elections in the USA and France, Britain's Brexit vote and Turkish constitutional referendum showed signs of extreme polarization. Among the countries affected, Ukraine faced some of the gravest consequences. In an attempt to understand the mechanisms of these phenomena, we here combine social media analysis with agent-based modelling of opinion dynamics, targeting Ukraine's crisis of 2014. We use Twitter data to quantify changes in the opinion divide and parametrize an extended bounded confidence XY model, which provides a spatio-temporal description of the polarization dynamics. We demonstrate that the level of emotional intensity is a major driving force for polarization that can lead to a spontaneous onset of collective behaviour at a certain degree of homophily and conformity. We find that the critical level of emotional intensity corresponds to a polarization transition, marked by a sudden increase in the degree of involvement and in the opinion bimodality.

摘要

最近,多个国家都经历了极端的政治两极分化,在某些情况下,这导致了仇恨犯罪、暴力事件的升级以及政治动荡。除了美国和法国备受讨论的总统选举外,英国脱欧公投和土耳其宪法公投也显示出极端两极分化的迹象。在受影响的国家中,乌克兰面临着一些最严重的后果。为了试图理解这些现象的机制,我们在此将社交媒体分析与基于主体的意见动态建模相结合,以2014年乌克兰危机为研究对象。我们使用推特数据来量化意见分歧的变化,并对扩展的有界置信度XY模型进行参数化,该模型提供了两极分化动态的时空描述。我们证明,情绪强度水平是两极分化的主要驱动力,在一定程度的同质性和一致性下,它可能导致集体行为的自发出现。我们发现,情绪强度的临界水平对应于一次两极分化转变,其特征是参与度和意见双峰性突然增加。

相似文献

1
Polarized Ukraine 2014: opinion and territorial split demonstrated with the bounded confidence XY model, parametrized by Twitter data.2014年两极分化的乌克兰:基于推特数据参数化的有界置信度XY模型所展示的观点和领土分裂
R Soc Open Sci. 2018 Aug 1;5(8):171935. doi: 10.1098/rsos.171935. eCollection 2018 Aug.
2
Stance and influence of Twitter users regarding the Brexit referendum.推特用户对英国脱欧公投的立场及影响。
Comput Soc Netw. 2017;4(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s40649-017-0042-6. Epub 2017 Jul 24.
3
Reconstruction of the socio-semantic dynamics of political activist Twitter networks-Method and application to the 2017 French presidential election.重建政治活动家推特网络的社会语义动态——以 2017 年法国总统选举为例的方法与应用。
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 19;13(9):e0201879. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201879. eCollection 2018.
4
Who polarizes Twitter? Ideological polarization, partisan groups and strategic networked campaigning on Twitter during the 2017 and 2021 German Federal elections 'Bundestagswahlen'.谁在使推特两极分化?2017年和2021年德国联邦议院选举期间推特上的意识形态两极分化、党派团体与策略性网络竞选活动
Soc Netw Anal Min. 2022;12(1):151. doi: 10.1007/s13278-022-00958-w. Epub 2022 Oct 11.
5
Moral Expressions in 280 Characters or Less: An Analysis of Politician Tweets Following the 2016 Brexit Referendum Vote.280字及以内的道德表达:对2016年英国脱欧公投后政治家推文的分析
Front Big Data. 2021 Jul 1;4:699653. doi: 10.3389/fdata.2021.699653. eCollection 2021.
6
News sharing on Twitter reveals emergent fragmentation of media agenda and persistent polarization.推特上的新闻分享揭示了媒体议程的新出现的碎片化和持续的两极分化。
EPJ Data Sci. 2022;11(1):48. doi: 10.1140/epjds/s13688-022-00360-8. Epub 2022 Aug 19.
7
Investigating political polarization in India through the lens of Twitter.通过推特视角研究印度的政治两极分化。
Soc Netw Anal Min. 2022;12(1):97. doi: 10.1007/s13278-022-00939-z. Epub 2022 Jul 31.
8
Modeling Echo Chambers and Polarization Dynamics in Social Networks.社交网络中的回音室效应和极化动态建模。
Phys Rev Lett. 2020 Jan 31;124(4):048301. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.048301.
9
Public opinion monitoring through collective semantic analysis of tweets.通过推文的集体语义分析进行舆情监测。
Soc Netw Anal Min. 2022;12(1):91. doi: 10.1007/s13278-022-00922-8. Epub 2022 Jul 26.
10
Opinion limits study for the multi-selection bounded confidence model.意见限制了多选择有界置信模型的研究。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 23;14(1):e0210745. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210745. eCollection 2019.

引用本文的文献

1
Response to collective threat: Russian invasion unifies Ukrainians across ethnic, linguistic, religious and geographic lines.对集体威胁的反应:俄罗斯入侵使乌克兰人在种族、语言、宗教和地理界限上团结起来。
R Soc Open Sci. 2025 Jan 22;12(1):241005. doi: 10.1098/rsos.241005. eCollection 2025 Jan.
2
Research on risk assessment model and simulation of online group polarization in emergencies.突发事件中网络群体极化的风险评估模型与仿真研究
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 17;19(6):e0305552. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305552. eCollection 2024.
3
Knowledge through social networks: Accuracy, error, and polarisation.

本文引用的文献

1
From social data mining to forecasting socio-economic crises.从社会数据挖掘到社会经济危机预测。
Eur Phys J Spec Top. 2011;195(1):3. doi: 10.1140/epjst/e2011-01401-8. Epub 2011 May 30.
2
Political science. Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook.政治学。在 Facebook 上接触意识形态多样的新闻和观点。
Science. 2015 Jun 5;348(6239):1130-2. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa1160. Epub 2015 May 7.
3
Rumor diffusion and convergence during the 3.11 earthquake: a twitter case study.3·11地震期间谣言的传播与汇聚:一项推特案例研究
知识通过社交网络:准确性、错误和极化。
PLoS One. 2024 Jan 3;19(1):e0294815. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294815. eCollection 2024.
4
Information cocoons in online navigation.在线导航中的信息茧房。
iScience. 2022 Dec 28;26(1):105893. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.105893. eCollection 2023 Jan 20.
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 1;10(4):e0121443. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121443. eCollection 2015.
4
Tricritical points in a Vicsek model of self-propelled particles with bounded confidence.具有有限置信度的自驱动粒子Vicsek模型中的三临界点。
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2014 Dec;90(6):063315. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.90.063315. Epub 2014 Dec 24.
5
Biased assimilation, homophily, and the dynamics of polarization.偏见同化、同质性和极化的动态。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Apr 9;110(15):5791-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1217220110. Epub 2013 Mar 27.
6
Discrete model of opinion changes using knowledge and emotions as control variables.使用知识和情感作为控制变量的意见变化离散模型。
PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e44489. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044489. Epub 2012 Sep 11.
7
Competition among memes in a world with limited attention.在注意力有限的世界中,模因之间的竞争。
Sci Rep. 2012;2:335. doi: 10.1038/srep00335. Epub 2012 Mar 29.
8
Modeling users' activity on twitter networks: validation of Dunbar's number.在推特网络上模拟用户的活动:邓巴数的验证。
PLoS One. 2011;6(8):e22656. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0022656. Epub 2011 Aug 3.
9
Novel type of phase transition in a system of self-driven particles.自驱动粒子系统中的新型相变
Phys Rev Lett. 1995 Aug 7;75(6):1226-1229. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.1226.