• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过推特视角研究印度的政治两极分化。

Investigating political polarization in India through the lens of Twitter.

作者信息

Borah Anindita, Singh Sanasam Ranbir

机构信息

Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, Guwahati, Assam India.

出版信息

Soc Netw Anal Min. 2022;12(1):97. doi: 10.1007/s13278-022-00939-z. Epub 2022 Jul 31.

DOI:10.1007/s13278-022-00939-z
PMID:35937771
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9340722/
Abstract

Social media plays a pivotal role in shaping communication among political entities. Substantial research has been carried out for examining the impact of politicians' social media usage and interactions on political polarization. Analysing political polarization is particularly significant for fragmented political systems like India where collaboration between parties is essential for winning support in parliament. Different topics of discussion between political entities may induce different levels of polarization. This study aims to examine the presence of polarization on Twitter social media platform with respect to different topics of political discussions among Indian politicians. The investigation is based upon two conflicting notions about social media in influencing political polarization. The first notion regards social media as a medium for interaction between different ideological users. The second opinion on the other hand focuses on prevalence of selective exposure in social media leading to polarization. The study will investigate the use of Twitter for forming communication ties in and between parties and the extent of divergence of opinions during political discourse. The investigation performs social network analysis and content analysis of the tweets posted by Indian politicians during some major events in India from 2019 to 2021. For an unbiased topic-specific analysis of polarization, some important topics related to Indian government policies, national security and natural disaster events have been considered. The findings of the study suggest that Twitter not only opens up communication spaces to Indian political users but also makes online political discussions among them polarized. Moreover, the extent of polarization varies with respect to topics of political discussions. Polarization is more for controversial and debatable topics than non-controversial ones.

摘要

社交媒体在塑造政治实体间的交流方面发挥着关键作用。已开展了大量研究来考察政治家使用社交媒体及互动对政治两极分化的影响。对于像印度这样的碎片化政治体系而言,分析政治两极分化尤为重要,因为政党间的合作对于在议会赢得支持至关重要。政治实体之间不同的讨论话题可能会引发不同程度的两极分化。本研究旨在考察在推特社交媒体平台上,印度政治家之间围绕不同政治讨论话题存在的两极分化情况。该调查基于关于社交媒体影响政治两极分化的两种相互冲突的观点。第一种观点将社交媒体视为不同意识形态用户之间的互动媒介。另一方面,第二种观点则关注社交媒体中选择性曝光的盛行导致两极分化的情况。该研究将调查推特在政党内部及政党之间形成交流纽带方面的使用情况,以及政治话语期间意见分歧的程度。该调查对2019年至2021年印度一些重大事件期间印度政治家发布的推文进行了社会网络分析和内容分析。为了对两极分化进行无偏差的特定主题分析,考虑了一些与印度政府政策、国家安全和自然灾害事件相关的重要话题。研究结果表明,推特不仅为印度政治用户开辟了交流空间,还使他们之间的在线政治讨论两极分化。此外,两极分化的程度因政治讨论话题而异。对于有争议和可辩论的话题,两极分化程度高于无争议话题。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23cf/9340722/91b4a7ba4713/13278_2022_939_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23cf/9340722/874f25dd4be0/13278_2022_939_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23cf/9340722/acc32bdbfa1c/13278_2022_939_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23cf/9340722/0959c4472642/13278_2022_939_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23cf/9340722/039534fce17d/13278_2022_939_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23cf/9340722/89f3b9db0a68/13278_2022_939_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23cf/9340722/2a306fad856c/13278_2022_939_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23cf/9340722/f91d84f865c0/13278_2022_939_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23cf/9340722/94e9551c2d3e/13278_2022_939_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23cf/9340722/23ff5d7a6b12/13278_2022_939_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23cf/9340722/91b4a7ba4713/13278_2022_939_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23cf/9340722/874f25dd4be0/13278_2022_939_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23cf/9340722/acc32bdbfa1c/13278_2022_939_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23cf/9340722/0959c4472642/13278_2022_939_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23cf/9340722/039534fce17d/13278_2022_939_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23cf/9340722/89f3b9db0a68/13278_2022_939_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23cf/9340722/2a306fad856c/13278_2022_939_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23cf/9340722/f91d84f865c0/13278_2022_939_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23cf/9340722/94e9551c2d3e/13278_2022_939_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23cf/9340722/23ff5d7a6b12/13278_2022_939_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23cf/9340722/91b4a7ba4713/13278_2022_939_Fig10_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Investigating political polarization in India through the lens of Twitter.通过推特视角研究印度的政治两极分化。
Soc Netw Anal Min. 2022;12(1):97. doi: 10.1007/s13278-022-00939-z. Epub 2022 Jul 31.
2
Who polarizes Twitter? Ideological polarization, partisan groups and strategic networked campaigning on Twitter during the 2017 and 2021 German Federal elections 'Bundestagswahlen'.谁在使推特两极分化?2017年和2021年德国联邦议院选举期间推特上的意识形态两极分化、党派团体与策略性网络竞选活动
Soc Netw Anal Min. 2022;12(1):151. doi: 10.1007/s13278-022-00958-w. Epub 2022 Oct 11.
3
Political polarization on Twitter during the COVID-19 pandemic: a case study in Brazil.新冠疫情期间推特上的政治两极分化:巴西的一个案例研究
Soc Netw Anal Min. 2022;12(1):140. doi: 10.1007/s13278-022-00949-x. Epub 2022 Sep 23.
4
Positioning analysis of Spanish politicians through their Twitter posts versus Spanish public opinion.通过西班牙政治家的推特帖子与西班牙公众舆论进行的定位分析。
Humanit Soc Sci Commun. 2023;10(1):307. doi: 10.1057/s41599-023-01805-9. Epub 2023 Jun 8.
5
Political Partisanship and Antiscience Attitudes in Online Discussions About COVID-19: Twitter Content Analysis.政治党派偏见与新冠疫情线上讨论中的反科学态度:推特内容分析
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jun 14;23(6):e26692. doi: 10.2196/26692.
6
Tweeting From Left to Right: Is Online Political Communication More Than an Echo Chamber?从左到右发推文:网络政治交流是否不止是一个回音室?
Psychol Sci. 2015 Oct;26(10):1531-42. doi: 10.1177/0956797615594620. Epub 2015 Aug 21.
7
Political polarization drives online conversations about COVID-19 in the United States.政治两极分化推动了美国关于新冠疫情的线上讨论。
Hum Behav Emerg Technol. 2020 Jul;2(3):200-211. doi: 10.1002/hbe2.202. Epub 2020 Jul 1.
8
Ideological Consumerism in Colombian Elections, 2015: Links Between Political Ideology, Twitter Activity, and Electoral Results.2015年哥伦比亚选举中的意识形态消费主义:政治意识形态、推特活动与选举结果之间的联系
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2017 Jan;20(1):37-43. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2016.0402.
9
#: How Do Political Figures Use Humor on ?#:政治人物如何运用幽默? (你提供的原文似乎不完整,结尾“on?”表述不太清晰,这是按照现有内容尽量准确翻译的结果 )
Front Sociol. 2022 Apr 1;7:788742. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2022.788742. eCollection 2022.
10
Twitter Mediated Sociopolitical Communication During the COVID-19 Pandemic Crisis in India.印度新冠疫情危机期间推特介导的社会政治传播
Front Psychol. 2021 Dec 24;12:784907. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.784907. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Detecting COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in India: a multimodal transformer based approach.检测印度对新冠疫苗的犹豫态度:一种基于多模态变压器的方法。
J Intell Inf Syst. 2023;60(1):157-173. doi: 10.1007/s10844-022-00745-1. Epub 2022 Sep 7.

本文引用的文献

1
The Twitter parliamentarian database: Analyzing Twitter politics across 26 countries.推特政治家数据库:分析 26 个国家的推特政治
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 16;15(9):e0237073. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237073. eCollection 2020.
2
Retweet networks of the European Parliament: evaluation of the community structure.欧洲议会的转发网络:社区结构评估
Appl Netw Sci. 2016;1(1):2. doi: 10.1007/s41109-016-0001-4. Epub 2016 Jun 1.
3
Measuring political polarization: Twitter shows the two sides of Venezuela.衡量政治两极分化:推特展现了委内瑞拉的两面。
Chaos. 2015 Mar;25(3):033114. doi: 10.1063/1.4913758.