Brain Dynamics and Cognition Team, Lyon Neuroscience Research Center; CRNL, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale Unité 1028, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique Unité Mixte de Recherche 5292, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France 69500.
eNeuro. 2018 Sep 17;5(4). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0141-18.2018. eCollection 2018 Jul-Aug.
Anticipatory attention results in enhanced response to task-relevant stimulus, and reduced processing of unattended input, suggesting the deployment of distinct facilitatory and suppressive mechanisms. α Oscillations are a suitable candidate for supporting these mechanisms. We aimed to examine the role of α oscillations, with a special focus on peak frequencies, in facilitatory and suppressive mechanisms during auditory anticipation, within the auditory and visual regions. Magnetoencephalographic (MEG) data were collected from fourteen healthy young human adults (eight female) performing an auditory task in which spatial attention to sounds was manipulated by visual cues, either informative or not of the target side. By incorporating uninformative cues, we could delineate facilitating and suppressive mechanisms. During anticipation of a visually-cued auditory target, we observed a decrease in α power around 9 Hz in the auditory cortices; and an increase around 13 Hz in the visual regions. Only this power increase in high α significantly correlated with behavior. Importantly, within the right auditory cortex, we showed a larger increase in high α power when attending an ipsilateral sound; and a stronger decrease in low α power when attending a contralateral sound. In summary, we found facilitatory and suppressive attentional mechanisms with distinct timing in task-relevant and task-irrelevant brain areas, differentially correlated to behavior and supported by distinct α sub-bands. We provide new insight into the role of the α peak-frequency by showing that anticipatory attention is supported by distinct facilitatory and suppressive mechanisms, mediated in different low and high sub-bands of the α rhythm, respectively.
前瞻性注意导致对任务相关刺激的反应增强,对未注意输入的处理减少,这表明存在不同的促进和抑制机制。α 振荡是支持这些机制的合适候选者。我们旨在研究 α 振荡(特别关注峰值频率)在听觉预期过程中的促进和抑制机制中的作用,包括听觉和视觉区域。使用十四名健康年轻的人类成年人(八名女性)的脑磁图(MEG)数据,这些成年人在执行听觉任务时,通过视觉线索来操纵对声音的空间注意力,视觉线索要么提供目标侧的信息,要么不提供目标侧的信息。通过纳入无信息线索,我们可以描绘出促进和抑制机制。在视觉提示的听觉目标的预期期间,我们在听觉皮层中观察到 9 Hz 左右的 α 功率下降;而在视觉区域中观察到 13 Hz 左右的α功率增加。只有高 α 频段的这种功率增加与行为显著相关。重要的是,在右听觉皮层中,当注意同侧声音时,高 α 频段的功率增加更大;当注意对侧声音时,低 α 频段的功率下降更强。总之,我们在任务相关和任务无关的大脑区域中发现了具有不同时间特征的促进和抑制注意机制,它们与行为有不同的相关性,并得到不同的α亚频段的支持。我们通过显示前瞻性注意由不同的促进和抑制机制支持,分别由 α 节律的不同低和高亚带介导,提供了对α峰频率作用的新见解。