Haegens Saskia, Cousijn Helena, Wallis George, Harrison Paul J, Nobre Anna C
Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, USA; Cognitive Neuroscience and Schizophrenia Program, Nathan Kline Institute, Orangeburg, USA.
Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Oxford Centre for Human Brain Activity, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Neuroimage. 2014 May 15;92(100):46-55. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.01.049. Epub 2014 Feb 6.
Converging electrophysiological evidence suggests that the alpha rhythm plays an important and active role in cognitive processing. Here, we systematically studied variability in posterior alpha peak frequency both between and within subjects. We recorded brain activity using MEG in 51 healthy human subjects under three experimental conditions - rest, passive visual stimulation and an N-back working memory paradigm, using source reconstruction methods to separate alpha activity from parietal and occipital sources. We asked how alpha peak frequency differed within subjects across cognitive conditions and regions of interest, and looked at the distribution of alpha peak frequency between subjects. In both regions we observed an increase of alpha peak frequency from resting state and passive visual stimulation conditions to the N-back paradigm, with a significantly higher alpha peak frequency in the 2-back compared to the 0-back condition. There was a trend for a greater increase in alpha peak frequency during the N-back task in the occipital vs. parietal cortex. The average alpha peak frequency across all subjects, conditions, and regions of interest was 10.3 Hz with a within-subject SD of 0.9 Hz and a between-subject SD of 2.8 Hz. We also measured beta peak frequencies, and except in the parietal cortex during rest, found no indication of a strictly harmonic relationship with alpha peak frequencies. We conclude that alpha peak frequency in posterior regions increases with increasing cognitive demands, and that the alpha rhythm operates across a wider frequency range than the 8-12 Hz band many studies tend to include in their analysis. Thus, using a fixed and limited alpha frequency band might bias results against certain subjects and conditions.
越来越多的电生理证据表明,α节律在认知加工中发挥着重要且积极的作用。在此,我们系统地研究了受试者之间以及受试者内部后顶叶α峰值频率的变异性。我们使用脑磁图(MEG)记录了51名健康人类受试者在三种实验条件下的脑活动——静息、被动视觉刺激和N-back工作记忆范式,采用源重建方法将α活动与顶叶和枕叶源分离。我们探究了受试者在不同认知条件和感兴趣区域内α峰值频率的差异,并观察了受试者之间α峰值频率的分布情况。在这两个区域,我们均观察到从静息状态和被动视觉刺激条件到N-back范式,α峰值频率有所增加,与0-back条件相比,2-back条件下的α峰值频率显著更高。在枕叶与顶叶皮层的N-back任务中,α峰值频率有更大增加的趋势。所有受试者、条件和感兴趣区域的平均α峰值频率为10.3赫兹,受试者内部标准差为0.9赫兹,受试者之间标准差为2.8赫兹。我们还测量了β峰值频率,除了静息时的顶叶皮层外,未发现与α峰值频率存在严格谐波关系的迹象。我们得出结论,后顶叶区域的α峰值频率随认知需求增加而升高,并且α节律的运作频率范围比许多研究在分析中倾向纳入的8 - 12赫兹频段更宽。因此,使用固定且有限的α频段可能会使某些受试者和条件的结果产生偏差。