• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Process Innovation Improves Trial Operation Efficiency.

作者信息

Choi Yun Jung, Kim Kyu-Pyo, Park Sumi, Park MiYeon, Kim Sulhwa, Kim Younkyoung, Bae Kyun-Seop, Beck Sung-Ho, Choi Ki-Eun, Chung Jong Woo, Lim Young-Suk, Kim Tae Won

机构信息

1 Asan Medical Center, Clinical Trial Center, Seoul, Korea.

6 Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2016 Jul;50(4):510-514. doi: 10.1177/2168479016634148.

DOI:10.1177/2168479016634148
PMID:30227017
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite the fact that unaddressed delays in clinical trial operation could severely compromise the overall effort invested, there seems to be a lack of concerted effort in reforming such delays. This study evaluated the composite effect of initiatives in reforming trial operation efficiency.

METHODS

A high-volume academic medical center in Korea has implemented various initiatives to improve the trial operation efficiency by expediting times from institutional review board (IRB) submission to approval, from IRB submission to trial open for subject enrollment, and from trial open to first patient-in. The initiatives include implementation of the protocol preliminary review, parallel processing of the clinical trial agreement review in line with the protocol submission to the IRB, and involvement of project manager for operational risk management. Times from IRB submission to approval, from IRB submission to trial open, and from trial open to first patient-in before and after implementation of initiatives were compared.

RESULTS

The median time required in IRB approval was meaningfully shorter in the postinitiative group (19 vs 14 days; P < .001). The median times from IRB submission to trial open for subject enrollment and from trial open to first patient-in were reduced significantly in the postinitiative group (trial open: 25 vs 18 days, P < .001; first patient-in: 111.5 vs 100 days, P = .014).

CONCLUSIONS

The initiatives were effective in reforming trial operational efficiency. Additional studies to address the cause of operational delay and modifiable factors influencing subject enrollment are needed to further improve operational efficiency.

摘要

相似文献

1
Process Innovation Improves Trial Operation Efficiency.
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2016 Jul;50(4):510-514. doi: 10.1177/2168479016634148.
2
Time to institutional review board approval with local versus central review in a multicenter pragmatic trial.在一项多中心实用试验中,采用本地审查与中央审查获得机构审查委员会批准的时间。
Clin Trials. 2018 Feb;15(1):107-111. doi: 10.1177/1740774517735536. Epub 2017 Oct 6.
3
A Trial Activation Initiative to Accelerate Trial Opening in an Academic Medical Center.一项在学术医疗中心加速试验启动的试验激活计划。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2015 Mar;49(2):234-238. doi: 10.1177/2168479014554399.
4
How do 66 European institutional review boards approve one protocol for an international prospective observational study on traumatic brain injury? Experiences from the CENTER-TBI study.66个欧洲机构审查委员会如何批准一项关于创伤性脑损伤的国际前瞻性观察性研究方案?CENTER-TBI研究的经验。
BMC Med Ethics. 2020 May 12;21(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s12910-020-00480-8.
5
Protocol-in-a-Day Workshop: Expediting IRB Approval for Junior and Senior Faculty.一日协议研讨会:加快初级和高级教员的机构审查委员会批准流程
J Cancer Educ. 2025 Feb;40(1):11-15. doi: 10.1007/s13187-024-02460-7. Epub 2024 Jun 24.
6
Review of multicenter studies by multiple institutional review boards: characteristics and outcomes for perinatal studies implemented by a multicenter network.多中心研究的综述:由多中心网络实施的围产期研究的特点和结果。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jan;212(1):110.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.07.058. Epub 2014 Aug 1.
7
American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.美国临床肿瘤学会政策声明:临床研究监督
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jun 15;21(12):2377-86. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.04.026. Epub 2003 Apr 29.
8
Customizable orthopaedic oncology implants: one institution's experience with meeting current IRB and FDA requirements.可定制的骨肿瘤植入物:一家机构满足当前机构审查委员会和美国食品药品监督管理局要求的经验。
Springerplus. 2016 Jul 4;5(1):967. doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-2696-1. eCollection 2016.
9
Expedited Safety Reporting to Sponsors Through the Implementation of an Alert System for Clinical Trial Management at an Academic Medical Center: Retrospective Design Study.通过在学术医疗中心实施临床试验管理警报系统向申办者进行快速安全报告:回顾性设计研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2020 Feb 23;8(2):e14379. doi: 10.2196/14379.
10
A multisite study of performance drivers among institutional review boards.一项关于机构审查委员会绩效驱动因素的多地点研究。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2017 Jun;1(3):192-197. doi: 10.1017/cts.2017.8. Epub 2017 Jul 24.