• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

可定制的骨肿瘤植入物:一家机构满足当前机构审查委员会和美国食品药品监督管理局要求的经验。

Customizable orthopaedic oncology implants: one institution's experience with meeting current IRB and FDA requirements.

作者信息

Willis Alexander R, Ippolito Joseph A, Patterson Francis R, Benevenia Joseph, Beebe Kathleen S

机构信息

Monmouth Medical Center, Long Branch, NJ 07740 USA.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, 140 Bergen Street, ACC Building, Suite D-1610, Newark, NJ 07103 USA.

出版信息

Springerplus. 2016 Jul 4;5(1):967. doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-2696-1. eCollection 2016.

DOI:10.1186/s40064-016-2696-1
PMID:27429877
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4932010/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Customizable orthopaedic implants are often needed for patients with primary malignant bone tumors due to unique anatomy or complex mechanical problems. Currently, obtaining customizable orthopaedic implants for orthopaedic oncology patients can be an arduous task involving submitting approval requests to the Institutional Review Board (IRB) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). There is great potential for the delay of a patient's surgery and unnecessary paperwork if the submission pathways are misunderstood or a streamlined protocol is not in place.

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to review the existing FDA custom implant approval pathways and to determine whether this process was improved with an institutional protocol.

METHODS

An institutional protocol for obtaining IRB and FDA approval for customizable orthopaedic implants was established with the IRB at our institution in 2013. This protocol was approved by the IRB, such that new patients only require submission of a modification to the existing protocol with individualized patient information. During the two-year period of 2013-2014, eight patients were retrospectively identified as having required customizable implants for various orthopaedic oncology surgeries. The dates of request for IRB approval, request for FDA approval, and total time to surgery were recorded, along with the specific pathway utilized for FDA approval.

RESULTS

The average patient age was 12 years old (7-21 years old). The average time to IRB approval of a modification to the pre-approved protocol was 14 days (7-21 days). Average time to FDA approval after submission of the IRB approval to the manufacturer was 12.5 days (7-19 days). FDA approval was obtained for all implants as compassionate use requests in accordance with Section 561 of the Federal Food Drug and Cosmetic Act's expanded access provisions.

CONCLUSIONS

Establishment of an institutional protocol with pre-approval by the IRB can expedite the otherwise time-consuming and complicated process of obtaining customizable orthopaedic implants for orthopaedic oncology patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Retrospective case series, Level IV. See the Guidelines for authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

摘要

背景

由于独特的解剖结构或复杂的力学问题,原发性恶性骨肿瘤患者通常需要定制的骨科植入物。目前,为骨科肿瘤患者获取定制的骨科植入物可能是一项艰巨的任务,涉及向机构审查委员会(IRB)和食品药品监督管理局(FDA)提交审批申请。如果提交途径被误解或没有简化的方案,患者手术很可能会延迟,并且会产生不必要的文书工作。

目的

本研究的目的是回顾FDA现有的定制植入物审批途径,并确定通过机构方案是否能改进这一过程。

方法

2013年,我们机构与IRB制定了一项关于获得IRB和FDA对定制骨科植入物批准的机构方案。该方案经IRB批准,因此新患者只需提交对现有方案的修改并附上个体化患者信息。在2013 - 2014年的两年期间,回顾性确定8例患者在各种骨科肿瘤手术中需要定制植入物。记录IRB批准申请日期、FDA批准申请日期、手术总时间,以及FDA批准所采用的具体途径。

结果

患者平均年龄为12岁(7 - 21岁)。对预先批准方案的修改获得IRB批准的平均时间为14天(7 - 21天)。向制造商提交IRB批准后获得FDA批准的平均时间为12.5天(7 - 19天)。根据《联邦食品药品和化妆品法案》扩大使用条款第561节,所有植入物均作为同情用药申请获得FDA批准。

结论

建立经IRB预先批准的机构方案可以加快为骨科肿瘤患者获取定制骨科植入物这一原本耗时且复杂的过程。

证据水平

回顾性病例系列,IV级。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参见作者指南。

相似文献

1
Customizable orthopaedic oncology implants: one institution's experience with meeting current IRB and FDA requirements.可定制的骨肿瘤植入物:一家机构满足当前机构审查委员会和美国食品药品监督管理局要求的经验。
Springerplus. 2016 Jul 4;5(1):967. doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-2696-1. eCollection 2016.
2
Time to institutional review board approval with local versus central review in a multicenter pragmatic trial.在一项多中心实用试验中,采用本地审查与中央审查获得机构审查委员会批准的时间。
Clin Trials. 2018 Feb;15(1):107-111. doi: 10.1177/1740774517735536. Epub 2017 Oct 6.
3
Single-Patient Expanded Access Requests: IRB Professionals' Experiences and Perspectives.单病例扩大使用申请:机构审查委员会专业人员的经验与观点
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2019 Apr-Jun;10(2):88-99. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2019.1577192. Epub 2019 Apr 9.
4
How do Orthopaedic Devices Change After Their Initial FDA Premarket Approval?骨科器械在首次获得美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)上市前批准后会发生怎样的变化?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Apr;474(4):1053-68. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4634-x. Epub 2015 Nov 19.
5
American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.美国临床肿瘤学会政策声明:临床研究监督
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jun 15;21(12):2377-86. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.04.026. Epub 2003 Apr 29.
6
Regulatory Support Improves Subsequent IRB Approval Rates in Studies Initially Deemed Not Ready for Review: A CTSA Institution's Experience.监管支持提高了最初被认为未准备好进行审查的研究的后续机构审查委员会批准率:一个临床与转化科学奖机构的经验。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2018 Apr;13(2):139-144. doi: 10.1177/1556264617752725. Epub 2018 Jan 18.
7
Availability of Investigational Medicines Through the US Food and Drug Administration's Expanded Access and Compassionate Use Programs.通过美国食品和药物管理局扩大准入和同情用药计划获得研究药物。
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Jun 1;1(2):e180283. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.0283.
8
Review of multicenter studies by multiple institutional review boards: characteristics and outcomes for perinatal studies implemented by a multicenter network.多中心研究的综述:由多中心网络实施的围产期研究的特点和结果。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jan;212(1):110.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.07.058. Epub 2014 Aug 1.
9
Understanding institutional review boards: practical guidance to the IRB review process.了解机构审查委员会:IRB审查过程实用指南
Nutr Clin Pract. 2007 Dec;22(6):618-28. doi: 10.1177/0115426507022006618.
10
Working with the institutional review board.与机构审查委员会合作。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2009 Jan 15;66(2):176-84. doi: 10.2146/ajhp070066.

引用本文的文献

1
Complications of patients with bone tumors treated with carbon-fiber plates: an international multicenter study.碳纤维板治疗骨肿瘤患者的并发症:一项国际多中心研究。
Sci Rep. 2022 Nov 8;12(1):18969. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-23519-9.

本文引用的文献

1
How Do I Get What I Need? Navigating the FDA's Custom, Compassionate Use, and HDE Pathways for Medical Devices and Implants.
J Arthroplasty. 2015 Jun;30(6):919-22. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.01.025. Epub 2015 Jan 23.
2
Postmarketing trials and pediatric device approvals.上市后试验与儿科医疗器械批准
Pediatrics. 2014 May;133(5):e1197-202. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-3348. Epub 2014 Apr 14.
3
FDA approval of cardiac implantable electronic devices via original and supplement premarket approval pathways, 1979-2012.1979 年至 2012 年,通过原始和补充上市前批准途径获得心脏植入式电子设备的 FDA 批准。
JAMA. 2014;311(4):385-91. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.284986.
4
New orthopedic devices and the FDA.新型骨科器械与美国食品药品监督管理局
J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2009;19(3):173-84. doi: 10.1615/jlongtermeffmedimplants.v19.i3.20.
5
Seven-year experience of using Repiphysis expandable prosthesis in children with bone tumors.使用 Repiphysis 可膨胀假体治疗儿童骨肿瘤的 7 年经验。
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2010 Sep;55(3):457-63. doi: 10.1002/pbc.22598.
6
Mechanical failure of the Repiphysis expandable prosthesis: a case report.骨骺可扩张假体的机械故障:一例报告。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 May;92(5):1250-3. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.I.00591.
7
The epidemiology of osteosarcoma.骨肉瘤的流行病学
Cancer Treat Res. 2009;152:3-13. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-0284-9_1.
8
Association of leg-length inequality with knee osteoarthritis: a cohort study.腿长差异与膝骨关节炎的关联:一项队列研究。
Ann Intern Med. 2010 Mar 2;152(5):287-95. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-152-5-201003020-00006.
9
Functional outcomes after limb-salvage surgery and endoprosthetic reconstruction with an expandable prosthesis: a report of 4 cases.采用可扩张假体进行保肢手术及内置假体重建后的功能结果:4例报告
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009 Jun;90(6):1039-47. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2008.12.025.
10
Osteosarcoma incidence and survival rates from 1973 to 2004: data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program.1973年至2004年骨肉瘤的发病率和生存率:来自监测、流行病学和最终结果计划的数据。
Cancer. 2009 Apr 1;115(7):1531-43. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24121.